How about the first post in this thread. You don't say "I hate x86" or "I am a 68K fanboy". What you do is chime in over and over with passive aggressive comments about how x86 makes no sense. How a company that has announced Amiga compatible computers branded as Amiga have no connection to Amiga because they are on x86 processors.
You fail reading comprehension. If you want to dredge up the CUSA crap again, my question at that point was what a PC in a C64 case has to do with amiga.
The answer at the time was that at some unspecified future point, they'll sell a computer titled an amiga, which will run some sort of OS that is going to be amiga-like. As I said /repeatedly/ in that thread, once they sell an amiga product, I think they should have a section on amiga.org, just like AROS, Morph OS etc.
It has fuck all to do with the processor type.
Playing innocent because you use passive aggressive language doesn't mean you are not saying it. If I were to continually post "I don't understand why runequester thinks his opinion matters in any way", I would still be making a statement about you. That is how being passive aggressive works.
So you have nothing, other than whining?
Given that you seem to follow me around now, it seems you think quite a lot of my opinion. I suppose that's flattering.
Heck, even in the above post, you play passive aggressive. You pretend to be a victim by claiming to be depicted unfairly as a villain in a thread that was passive aggressively complaining about x86, and peoples comments that Amiga wasn't perfect.
My post had exactly nothing negative about x86 in it, and you know it.
Lets examine what I posted.
The only thing that is remotely negative is that yes, in the 80's PCs were wicked expensive, they generally ran windows 3.1, and PC speaker sucked.
Care to refute these points? Or have you dug yourself so far into fantasy land that you can't distinguish between facts and imaginary attacks ?
Since you claim you know exactly what I mean, you know damn well what I intended. As I have posted /in this very thread/ this isn't about amiga being superior. It's about being able to have a conversation without the same "commodore failed because of XXX" "amiga sucked because of XXX" crap that comes up every single time.
Yes, we all know that AGA was slow, and that commodore had bad marketing and that the 1200 wasnt powerfull enough and that windows 95 sold monstrously well.
It all doesn't matter anymore. It's 2011. Everyone else moved on.
Why keep dredging up the same crap over and over and over and over again?
