Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]   Go Down

Author Topic: dnetc benchmarks  (Read 38223 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show only replies by Tripitaka
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #179 from previous page: February 08, 2012, 02:30:24 PM »
Quote from: takemehomegrandma;679806
An easy and good (the best) way of keeping afloat, while searching for new land to settle...


That depends on your business model and future plans, I don't pretend to know what deals Hyperion are planning for the future. They seem pretty "afloat" right now so no worries from me. Either way, you've got MOS and if your happy with that, well, more power to you I guess. Enjoy it, and if OS4 dies you still have MOS. Either way the Amiga scene has plenty of NG choice right now, X1000, SAM, MOS or AROS, the choice is yours. Just don't go deluding yourself that any of them will be competition for Microsoft, it ain't going to happen.
Logged
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #180 on: February 08, 2012, 02:36:41 PM »
Quote from: kas1e;679807
There can be some "move on to", if only macs ports, then x86 migration, but for that need a lot of developers and time


I'm sure a clean-slate port (which I think would be most realistic for a "*Next* Next Generation") could be done rather quickly. Most essential programs are already native and still supported, with MorphOS 3.0 many of them will even be included in the OS. More time of course to work on 64-bit, true SMP, true MP, and the other stuff that requires a clean-slate break from the legacy, but that's more of development work, not port.
Logged
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline PiruTopic starter

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #181 on: February 08, 2012, 02:36:44 PM »
Quote from: TheDaddy;679802
So it's not to underline how crap OS4 is? Because if it's not the hardware then it must be the software...
Regarding the less than stellar X1000 performance: There is a problem somewhere. I have no idea if it's hardware or software (*). Hopefully it's a) something that can be fixed b) will be fixed soon. 2nd core support will likely take quite some time though.

*) Someone doing some linux benchmarking would easily be able to tell if the issue is a software one.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2012, 02:40:19 PM by Piru »
Logged
 

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show only replies by Tripitaka
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #182 on: February 08, 2012, 02:42:26 PM »
Quote from: Piru;679812
Regarding the less than stellar X1000 performance: There is a problem somewhere. I have no idea if it's hardware or software (*). Hopefully it's a) something that can be fixed b) will be fixed soon. 2nd core support will likely take quite some time though.

*) Someone doing some linux benchmarking would easily be able to tell if the issue is a software one.


I get the feeling Piru would really like to see the X1000 performing well. Nice to see from a MOS developer.
Logged
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #183 on: February 08, 2012, 02:46:17 PM »
Quote from: Tripitaka;679810
That depends on your business model and future plans, I don't pretend to know what deals Hyperion are planning for the future.


"Business model"? :lol:

Quote
Just don't go deluding yourself that any of them will be competition for Microsoft, it ain't going to happen.


My god, where did I ever give you that kind of impression? Just as a side note, it's hardly the MorphOS crowd that suffer from these kind of delusions, part of going MorphOS and "getting over" the trade mark, is to wake up, smell the coffee, and look at things as the *hobby* it really is...
Logged
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline Tripitaka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 1307
    • Show only replies by Tripitaka
    • http://acidapple.com
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #184 on: February 08, 2012, 03:00:17 PM »
Quote from: takemehomegrandma;679816
it's hardly the MorphOS crowd that suffer from these kind of delusions, part of going MorphOS and "getting over" the trade mark, is to wake up, smell the coffee, and look at things as the *hobby* it really is...


LMAO, I have no delusions I assure you. I intend to hunt for a Peg board in a few weeks time (waiting on the cash right now) so I can run MOS and OS4. I prefer to hedge my bets and eat popcorn.
Logged
Falling into a dark and red rage.
 

Offline TheDaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 1154
    • Show only replies by TheDaddy
    • http://www.loriano.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #185 on: February 08, 2012, 03:20:31 PM »
Quote from: Piru;679812
Regarding the less than stellar X1000 performance: There is a problem somewhere. I have no idea if it's hardware or software (*). Hopefully it's a) something that can be fixed b) will be fixed soon. 2nd core support will likely take quite some time though.

*) Someone doing some linux benchmarking would easily be able to tell if the issue is a software one.



That sounds like a better idea.
It's such a shame that so many skilled and talented programmers have to work on different operating systems...oh well...
Logged
 

Offline yakumo9275

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 301
    • Show only replies by yakumo9275
    • http://mega-tokyo.com/blog
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #186 on: February 08, 2012, 05:01:10 PM »
Quote from: Piru;679812
*) Someone doing some linux benchmarking would easily be able to tell if the issue is a software one.


not if the issue is GCC related.
Logged
--/\\-[ Stu ]-/\\--
Commodore 128DCR, JiffyDOS, Ultimate 1541 II, uIEC/SD, CBM 1902A  Monitor
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: dnetc benchmarks
« Reply #187 on: February 08, 2012, 07:23:13 PM »
In all fairness, I should say that I have meditated some over minator's posts (made both here and on moobunny), and I think he might have a point.

Maybe this will be a dipstick of the OS4 coders capabilities?

(Like the Pegasos 2 was? ;) Sorry, couldn't resist... :lol:)
Logged
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]   Go Up
« previous next »