Honestly, I thought our lawyers were the biggest vermin on the planet until I heard of this "call to order" issue.
Similar instruments exist in the US in the form of "Cease and Desist" letters.
It is not exactly the same as the German instrument, and I cannot answer you whether the first letter is "for free" in the US, i.e. you just receive the letter and must then stop the activity under question "or else". In Germany, and this is really a problematic issue, the first such letter is *not* fo free. You - receiving such a letter - must pay the lawyer sending this letter, no matter whether you stop or do not stop your activity.
I personally consider this a very questionable instrument as it requires the receiver of such a letter to take a legal action against another lawyer, which again might (or will) cost money. Unless in some obvious cases...
So yes, better be safe than sorry.
And as to not understanding manufacturing, I'll freely admit I don't understand the German restrictions on it.
It is not a question of "manufacturing" primarely, though this also plays into the problem. It is a question of competition regulations. That alone is not solely a German problem either. The "Call to order" regulation is one.
But it seems obvious that those same restrictions could be a driving force influencing multi-nationals to not consider Gemany as a location for manufacturing.
Not exactly the same, but similar laws exist in other countries, one way or another, so that is not exactly a German-only problem with manufacturing.
We cannot be that unsuccessful, though. Our export surplus is larger than that of China (i.e. exports in relation to imports) in 2016 - actually, it is the largest in the world. No, I'm not making this up. In 2015, we were "only" at position 2 behind China:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_current_account_balance(Probably to the surprise of many.)
Changed in 2016 (i.e. China behind Germany), but wikipedia does not yet list it.
The problem is that workforce is quite expensive over here (unlike China, but getting better? worse? there, too.). Not really the regulations. Every country has some. Countries that have less have other problems. I've been in China in October (Chengdu, a "small" town in the chinese province of ~14 million people) and haven't seen the sun for ten days due to smog.
No, I don't want that.
I thought we had intense environmental regulation over here.
But I'd have no problem coping with US regulations covering this endeavor.
I do not know whether you had been in contact with such regulations? I'm not an expert either, but there are a couple of other certificates you need (for Germany, or for the European Union, the CE certificate comes to my mind).
Finally, throughout this thread we keep hearing how German regulations protect the consumer, but it seems like the costs of this protection AND the opportunistic activities of German lawyers are fairly injurious themselves.
German lawyers are a class of themselves. Problem is probably similar to the US: If you look at the profession of politicians, then you find lawyers at position 1. So, why would they make laws that work against their profession? (Probably not so different in the US).
Second problem: More or less by definition, a lawyer is a man whose oppinion can be bought by money. (After all, you need one to defend your position in court). Now, which story does this actually tell about politics?
So yes, democracy is probably the worst political system, except all other possible political systems I can think of. (-: