If you are ACTUALLY curious about the FACTS, join IRC. You spend so much time here arguing "truths", instead of going directly to the source. Its almost like you dont WANT to know the truth.
Apollo Team is very approachable when they are active on IRC, and it seems like they are around more or less every day.
I did this, and got a little wiser. It started out with everyone joking about me not understanding "the obvious", then turned around to nobody except Gunnar understanding "the obvious", which suddenly wasn't so "obvious" for the rest after all, which prompted Gunnar to go into eye-rolling tea-spoon mode and actually provide answers that "normal people" can grasp. During this, I endured being called an idiot and various other less flattering things, something I long ago learned to take as signs of being on the right course in this crazy community. :lol:
I wanted to know about the 080 FPU and how users are supposed to relate to it. Given the choice of a piece of software coming in 020+882, 040 or 060 variants, which is more ideal for AC-68080? Answer: 040 or 060 - it doesn't matter much which. Given a piece of software does not support FPU or comes in 020+881/882, your mileage may vary, there will be "software that takes care of it", and how well that works depends on the functions at hand. "The software" will apparently be in ROM, though it is unclear for me what that means - I think not in kickstart, but rather something "closer" to the FPGA. (At this point we also learned that the 68882 is not really an FPU, but rather just a chip that runs a whole lot of microcode - software in ROM, providing an FPU interface, what we know as 68882, but whatever). Then there was a "but" and a small rant about awesomeness of the new stuff that will be in the FPU, but as someone who is more concerned with how well ancient utility software will work rather than playing media files (I have more than half a dozen devices that will do that so vastly much better than any Amiga will ever do anyways) I just zoned out. Oh, and the "regular" 68040.library will be redundant.
Next for me would be to ask about MMU, as new fast m68k hardware for Linux and BSD is very much sought after, believe it or not. People may think sticking with AmigaOS on m68k is crazy, but how about those of us who stick with m68k for Linux and BSD, despite all the other hardware we can run that on? We are f*ckin lunatics in comparison. Right? :laughing: