Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?  (Read 36880 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #89 on: December 13, 2012, 08:05:05 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718922
N
Furthermore, it's not a Blizzard 1240 but a Blizzard 1260 with a socketed 40MHz 68040


Sounds really weird.

Does he have an explanation for how that happened?
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA
 

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #90 on: December 13, 2012, 08:13:23 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718915
Has anyone ever heard of a Blizzard 1260 with a socketed 040 CPU?


I haven't.  But I guess anyone could downgrade an A1260 like that.  I just don't know why anyone would do that.


Quote

Considering the intended use (software development for the most part, ScummVM/Quake/Quake II/Feeble Files

The only way to run Quake in a reasonable manner is to have a fast 060 + a gfx card.



Quote

 when I'm bored or need inspiration or simply want to programm a game in the SCI Engine or on top of id Tech) and me being somewhat of a RAM whore (I have 16GB in my Windows rig and even that isn't entirely enough yet), Blizzard is probably the better choice.

How did u use u 16GB in windoze?

I just bought a 10GB windoze7 rig, thinking 10GB would be enuff.
I am typing this on my old 1GB XP box.
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA
 

Offline Blinx123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 383
    • Show only replies by Blinx123
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #91 on: December 13, 2012, 08:38:47 PM »
Quote from: ChaosLord;718924
You are talking about buying an A1240 and upgrading it to 060.


I'm actually talking about buying a Blizzard 1260 with a 040 CPU and upgrading it to a 060 now.


Quote

I have no data on such a card.  I never did any timing tests on a card like that.


Me neither. But I know that the Apollo is supposed to have quite a bit faster chip access rates.

Quote

So it could have rocking hot performance at chipram access or really horrible performance.  I have no clue.


Afaik, it's a bit worse than Apollo but still good. Just wondering how much of an impact that will make though.

Where the Blizzard is supposed to shine is with HD access speeds and SCSI.

Quote

You could ask Cosmos to run Bustest on one of his cards like that.  Make sure he tells u the exact screenmode that the screen was in when running the test.  It makes all the difference.


Will do.

Is he still a member of this community?

Quote

I prefer tests done in 640x512x8bitplanes.  As I still have all my timing test results for that mode from various cards stashed on my HD somewhere.
(My games run in that mode so that is the mode we normally test.)


That's pretty much the same resolution I'm shooting for. Albeit interlaced and on my TV I bought just for this kind of hardware.

Quote
In any case, no matter what, u will get fantastic CPU calculation performance.  
Anything that happens inside the 060 (remember it has 2 8K L1 Caches) will be zoooming fast.


It has two L1 caches? Wow. I wasn't even aware of this.
I think I'm more excited for this than any CPU before (including Bulldozer and Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge)

Quote

So any 060 card will be an upgrade, its just a question of how much of an upgrade. :)


Hear, hear.
Sam: \\"You crack me up little buddy\\"
Max: \\"I love you Sam\\"
 

Offline Blinx123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 383
    • Show only replies by Blinx123
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #92 on: December 13, 2012, 08:43:41 PM »
Quote from: ChaosLord;718928
I haven't.  But I guess anyone could downgrade an A1260 like that.  I just don't know why anyone would do that.

This stuff gets more and more confusing by the hour. I just found out that some of those cards actually have jumpers  to go from 040 to 060 and back? What gives?


Quote
The only way to run Quake in a reasonable manner is to have a fast 060 + a gfx card.

Novacoder's Quake video on a plain AGA 060 says otherwise :wink ;)

Quote
How did u use u 16GB in windoze?

I just bought a 10GB windoze7 rig, thinking 10GB would be enuff.
I am typing this on my old 1GB XP box.

That's an easy one.
Just create a RAM-Disk of 12-14GB. Fills up rather quickly. Especially if you run games like Skyrim off your Ramdisk.
Sam: \\"You crack me up little buddy\\"
Max: \\"I love you Sam\\"
 

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #93 on: December 13, 2012, 08:49:44 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718937
This stuff gets more and more confusing by the hour. I just found out that some of those cards actually have jumpers  to go from 040 to 060 and back? What gives?

Maybe Apollo made them like that to save money?



Quote

That's an easy one.
Just create a RAM-Disk of 12-14GB. Fills up rather quickly. Especially if you run games like Skyrim off your Ramdisk.

Woah!  When did windoze invent a ram disk?
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA
 

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #94 on: December 13, 2012, 09:01:28 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718935

Where the Blizzard is supposed to shine is with HD access speeds and SCSI.

Ok, but that is only if you buy the SCSI addon card.

A proper SCSI DMA controller, such as the one in the 1990 A3000 uses 20x less cpu power and is 2x to 4x the transfer speed.  So its 80x better than the lame A1200/A4000 IDE PIO controller.


Quote

Is he still a member of this community?

Didn't u see him pop up in a thread recently?  Where I said u could get an 80Mhz 060 and he popped in to say 80Mhz was way to slow and he runs at 105Mhz.  Donno how u missed it.




Quote

It has two L1 caches? Wow. I wasn't even aware of this.
I think I'm more excited for this than any CPU before (including Bulldozer and Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge)


060 competed against Pentium.  IIRC Pentium only had 1 lame unified L1 cache.

060 had a much more efficient system where code gets its own cache and data gets its own cache.

Motorola used dual L1 caches since 1987 with the 68030.   Eventually, years later, Intel caught up with Motorola in this regard.
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA
 

Offline Damion

Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #95 on: December 13, 2012, 10:52:21 PM »
The Apollo had quite a bit faster access to the custom chipset (even better than many '030 cards), which was ideal for demanding AGA demos, and made the system feel a bit snappier in general. HD access as far as internal IDE was faster with the Apollo, but ofc the Blizzard had a much much better SCSI option.

The fast chipset access apparently caused compatibility problems with some motherboards (not unlike the ACA), which could be remedied by the usual timing fixes. Outside of that, I had mine running at 80MHz for days on end without crashing, and it worked fine with all my clockport cards (unlike the Blizz). The only thing I preferred WRT my Blizzard 1260 was the ability to take more RAM, but with the CPU facing down (it's up on the Apollo), keeping the trapdoor on wasn't really an option.
 
BTW - If you do a search over at eab in the hardware section, you'll find a thread from a few years back with a bunch of bustest results.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2012, 10:57:09 PM by Damion »
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #96 on: December 14, 2012, 04:55:58 AM »
Quote from: ChaosLord;718920

I hope this stuff isn't from ripoffEbay.


Hey! I'm an Ebay seller and so was Redrumloa (who you'll notice doesn't bother posting anymore).

Here's the trick with Ebay.
Check out the seller.
Has he had a fair number of transactions?
Is his feedback rating good?
Mine's 100% positive with over 400 feedback comments.
Next, and this is important, read the description.
If there are any qualifiers (like, hey no guarantees this is functional), don't buy it.
If the seller says its good, even if he's not offering to take returns you're covered.
Because you're going to pay with Paypal (created by the great Elon Musk - yeah the guy that runs Tesla Motors).
If you buy it and it doesn't match the description, contact the seller and file a complaint with Ebay.
If the seller doesn't offer you a fair resolution, Ebay will get you your money back (including the shipping).
After all, they own Paypal and can backcharge the Ahole.

Its that simple.

I've never had a bad transaction following these steps, because if I get screwed I get it all back (and I can keep the piece of crap and even leave negative feedback for the seller which he won't be able to retaliate about).

Like I said, simple.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline donpalmera

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 44
    • Show only replies by donpalmera
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #97 on: December 14, 2012, 08:18:32 AM »
Quote from: Iggy;718846
One company quoted $19.95.
Most slightly higher (although not as silly as US pricing).


Long time lerker .. first time poster..

I have a few questions; You are raving about these 68060FE133 chips being the best thing since sliced bread but have you actually tried any? It's very easy to say that someone should make a board based on those chips.. but it begs the question; If it is so easy why aren't *you* doing it instead of bad mouthing Jens for not doing it?
What's left of the "amiga community" seem to come up thing "I want a turbo card with n gigs of DDR, PCI blah blah" on a daily basis but there seems to actually only be three or four people actually still making serious efforts on producing new hardware (Jens, MikeJ etc).

Back to technical details.. Ok, so you can get these 68060FE133 parts from Chinese parts brokers. They don't exist according to Freescale but some of the documentation on some of the late 68k parts is a bit patchy.. i.e. what are all of the different 68SEC000 part numbers about? I suspect it's ROHS compliance or something but none of the datasheets or Product Change Notifications seem to go into any detail about what the different versions of the 68SEC000 are. The details on the 3.3v static 68040V parts is equally thin on the ground. So lets give these 68060FE133 parts the benefit of the doubt. It's possible that Motorola/Freescale produced them for one customer or something and there just happens to be a bunch of them around.

I'm not sure if you have any experience with Chinese parts brokers.. but there is a reason why Digikey etc have $200+ for certain 68k parts and a parts broker will quote you ~$20 for the same part. The reason is the Chinese broker has no idea if the parts are real or work and they don't care either. I did an experiment with 68SEC000 parts; I bought ~$200 worth of sample parts from about 5 or 6 brokers. The prices ranged from about $6 each to as low as $2 for 68SEC000FU10 (Motorola marked, 10Mhz). I have 5 - 10 parts from each broker.. To a certain extent you can use the mask revision,date code and assembly stamp on the underside of the chip to verify the parts. There are 3 masks of the 68SEC000 that I know about and via the PCNs on Freescale site I can work out if the date code is weird for that mask and from some other PCNs I can guess where a chip of that date code should have been packaged (Hong Kong or Malaysia). Out of all of the parts I think only one order *seems* like real parts. A lot of them are obviously suspect by the weird texture of the top of the chip (i.e. it feels like it has been sanded to remove the real markings) or the markings on the chip are just wrong. I have a theory that Chinese brokers will re-label chips to order (i.e. they have a pile of chips that are equivalent or at least the same form factor and they re-label them to suite whatever the customer has ordered). To test this I ordered some Freescale 68SEC000AE16 parts.. These should be Freescale marked (the part number is a freescale one, not a Motorola one) and should be a .5mm QFP not a .8mm QFP like the ones I had order up to that point.. I intentionally didn't put what package that the part should be in the Request For Quote. Out of all of the 20 or so quotes I got I had only one that stated the parts they had were LQFP as they should have. I ordered some from 2 or 3 of the brokers... guess what turned up a few weeks later? .8mm pitch QFPs with AE part numbers (If you haven't followed what I'm saying so far.. they shouldn't exist).

This is for hobby stuff so I don't really mind as long as the chips work. So I made up a small test jig with a BeagleBone that resets the chip and clocks it a few times to check if the stobes etc start doing the right things. I tested one chip from each batch (I have to solder them to a carrier, so I can't test them all) and they all seem to pass this basic "looks like a 68000 starting up" test. So .. what do you reckon is inside of these things? Without decapping them I will never know. I don't have the stuff to do it or I would have done it already.

Back to the 68060FE133 and Jens or whoever making a turbo card with them. The only place you can get them is Chinese brokers which are shady to say the least (See above). If you have followed MikeJ's FPGAArcade posts you will realise how difficult it is to get existing-according-to-Freescale 68060's that haven't been relabelled to a newer mask revision.
So any of these you buy should be treated as suspect from the get go. If you are shipping a product to end users you can't go shipping those parts without doing a lot of testing. They could be working chips with the part number changed to make them look faster.. they could be reject parts that have been saved and labelled, they could be empty plastic lumps with legs sticking out of the side. Who knows? If you could trust Chinese brokers I would have a pile of the 68040V's on my desk (They quoted $20 for those when the Digikey price is ~$200) and I would be designing a machine to use them in.. a 3.3v 68040 + FPGA sounds good to me. Hell, I can get some of those BGA 68060 parts from China for ~$20 .. maybe I should get some of those too? Maybe I would get really lucky and have real parts that worked 100% but it's more likely that they will be utter crap and the broker will disappear when I contact them about it.

The only person that seems to have actually tried those chips seems to be the Netami guy.. but I can't find anything that says if they actually worked or not, what the revision register said etc. Does anyone have a link? At least with the 68060 there is some data you can verify the revision against burnt into the chip..

The only cheap way I would recommend sourcing 68k parts is via surplus sellers in the US or similar. I have sourced some 68SEC000 parts for better than Digikey prices and recently some bog standard 68040FE parts for a tenth of the Digikey price this way. You can't be 100% sure they aren't fakes but it's a lot less likely... But for people shipping a product this is really still too risky IMHO and the quantities you can get hold of are in the tens of units (Maybe enough considering the market?). So you either have spend ages sourcing and testing the hell out of cheap parts or pay the crazy price that decent distributors want. Sounds like an awful lot of hassle for a product that might ship 50 units and for customers that harp on about how they could do better all the time..
 

Offline spirantho

Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #98 on: December 14, 2012, 09:02:03 AM »
What he said, basically.

The 68060 is a dodgy deal at the best of times. Jens has worked very hard to build up a reputation of quality hardware, it just doesn't make sense that he'd risk a lot of time and money in developing a board when the only supply of processors he has is from Chinese resellers who are apparently selling chips which the manufacturer denies all knowledge of. I know I wouldn't do that in a million years.

And what is the gain of making a 68060 accelerator anyway? It's not necessary for 95% of Amiga stuff, and for the other 5% die-hard Amigans can still get 68060 accelerators on eBay or whatever - sure they're more expensive, but a lot less expensive than developing a new accelerator. Like it or not, most Amigans use 68030 because it's probably the best compromise of compatibility and speed, and often use WinUAE for stuff that depends high power. There's not really a great many people out there who would cough up the extra for a 68060, as most people just don't have the need.

I keep seeing people posting about how "x should do y" all the time. Building an accelerator isn't just a matter of soldering a processor onto a board, shoving on a few RAM chips, and packaging it in a nice glossy box. It takes a LOT of time and effort to design new hardware like accelerators, jamming a processor into a machine that was never designed for it. The more different the CPU, the more work (and therefore cost) it is - and the 68060 is very different to the 68020/30.

@donpalmera
Welcome to Amiga.org - nice to see such a useful and pragmatic poster!

@Iggy
Quite right. eBay isn't the seller, it's the person who's doing the selling who's the seller. If people only bought from reputable sellers like you or I, they wouldn't have the same problems.... but I keep seeing eBay getting the blame because they bought something cheap off a shady bloke with no feedback.
Caveat Emptor, and you'll be just fine on eBay.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2012, 09:04:31 AM by spirantho »
--
Ian Gledhill
ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!)
Check out my shop! http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - for 8-bit (and soon 16-bit) goodness!
 

Offline Lord Aga

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 396
    • Show only replies by Lord Aga
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #99 on: December 14, 2012, 09:38:01 AM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718922

Furthermore, it's not a Blizzard 1240 but a Blizzard 1260 with a socketed 40MHz 68040 (didn't even know those existed.


Quote from: ChaosLord;718927
Sounds really weird.
Does he have an explanation for how that happened?


I think he may have been walking around with a CPU-less card, like many of us often do, then tripped, and fell right onto a 040 CPU. I can't see it happening any other way :)
Glory to the loud-mouthed Scotsman !
 

Offline donpalmera

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 44
    • Show only replies by donpalmera
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #100 on: December 14, 2012, 11:01:58 AM »
Quote from: spirantho;718998
What he said, basically.
I keep seeing people posting about how "x should do y" all the time. Building an accelerator isn't just a matter of soldering a processor onto a board, shoving on a few RAM chips, and packaging it in a nice glossy box. It takes a LOT of time and effort to design new hardware like accelerators, jamming a processor into a machine that was never designed for it. The more different the CPU, the more work (and therefore cost) it is - and the 68060 is very different to the 68020/30.


This is what prompted me to post to be honest. I'm sure there are a few really skilled software devs and hardware guys still around.. but they are definitely in the minority... you could probably count them on your hands alone. Aside from them there seems to be two types of people. Type 1: "I want 68060/Soft core in FPGA/PPC etc!! I must have it. NOW!" Type 2: "68060/Soft core in FPGA/PPC is so easy, I'm not sure why no one has done it yet. I wrote an enhanced 68060 core while I was on the toilet one morning.". The Type 2 people get the Type 1 people all excited by spouting drivel. I don't have the time or desire to mull over "the good old days" or "what if..." hence I have never posted before. I read amiga.org to keep up to date with interesting stuff like the FPGAArcade. Some of the people here seem to be on crack or have no grasp on reality. It's a shame people like Piru seem to have left. They might have been a bit sour but they added some much needed reality.

I doubt there are many people left "in the scene" that could put together a 68000 or 68020 system from scratch and those are the easy ones. The 68040 and 68060 are monsters in comparison. Yes.. it's nice to have a bit of a day dream when you see some cheap 68060s on Alibaba or whatever but unless you have the skills of Jens or MikeJ you'd be better off keeping it to yourself.
 

Offline Blinx123

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 383
    • Show only replies by Blinx123
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #101 on: December 14, 2012, 03:10:54 PM »
Got word from Cosmos.

Unfortunately, he is unable to assist me (or anyone else, for that matter) in the procedure.
A bunch of Frenchmen reported him for what they assumed would be moonlighting, so he quit.

I seriously hate Europe.
Sam: \\"You crack me up little buddy\\"
Max: \\"I love you Sam\\"
 

Offline psxphill

Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #102 on: December 14, 2012, 03:16:27 PM »
Quote from: Blinx123;718915
Has anyone ever heard of a Blizzard 1260 with a socketed 040 CPU? Seen mention of this in at least one thread on here and someone is offering me his Blizzard 1260 with a 40MHz 68040.
 
So is this some sort of hybrid or did someone downgrade it to a 1240? Seller said all I'd have to do is add a 68060 socket.

If it's got an 040 on it then it's a 1240. The only difference between the 1240 and the 1260 is the processor and power regulator.
 
http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/blizzard1260
 
According to this site http://g-mb.de/P5Rework.html#B12x0 some of the cards came with socketed processors. So it sounds like it could just be a 1240 to me.
 
It's possible that it started as a 1260 and it got downgraded because it got repaired with whatever parts they had, or someone wanted an 040 over an 060. But if it's only got the 040 socket, then only pay 1240 prices for it because that is essentially what it is.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2012, 03:21:54 PM by psxphill »
 

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #103 on: December 14, 2012, 03:21:01 PM »
Quote from: spirantho;718998

And what is the gain of making a 68060 accelerator anyway? It's not necessary for 95% of Amiga stuff, ...

68060 accellerators are useful on 100% of all Amiga productivity software.
68060 accellerators are useful on 100% of all Amiga cli commands.

That is thousands of programs that benefit.

68060 accellerators are useful on 100% of all properly coded games.


Trying to do web browsing, DAW or DTP on 68030 is nonsense. :)
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA
 

Offline ChaosLord

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 2608
    • Show only replies by ChaosLord
    • http://totalchaoseng.dbv.pl/news.php
Re: Will there be an ACA1240 or ACA1260?
« Reply #104 from previous page: December 14, 2012, 03:27:30 PM »
@ the 68060FE133 haters

Various ppl have bought them.  They used them.  Nobody has ever reported them as being fake or defective.  So why the hate?
Wanna try a wonderfull strategy game with lots of handdrawn anims,
Magic Spells and Monsters, Incredible playability and lastability,
English speech, etc. Total Chaos AGA