Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Is more MHZ better Or?  (Read 5434 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Is more MHZ better Or?
« on: October 19, 2012, 04:24:56 AM »
Hi i have a Apollo 1230 with 35 mhz. If i find another Apollo or someone like it, still with a 030 CPU but 50 mhz will it make my Amiga run faster and will more 3D games play better? Or does it not change so much in speed.
And what are that Overclocking someone talks about, how do they Overclock an CPU
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by save2600
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2012, 04:31:40 AM »
In the simplistic example, yes - 15mhz will make a noticeable difference in OS functions and most other day to day use. Many or most things will seem improved and snappier.

If you're hoping 3D games will play leagues (or many multiples of frames) better, I'd say you'd be disappointed.

Which 3D games are we talking about? Anything that is close to the definition of modern, you're going to want an 060 processor. Skip the 040 as it runs too hot and takes more electricity = heat, unless you land one on the cheap.

Over-clocking a board and CPU like this typically results in greater heat and less stability. Be prepared to learn about cooling - if it's even an option - which is typically NOT for the average user. See if your particular CPU stamp is even capable first... then swap an oscillator (crystal) or two if it has a discrete math co-processor. Thing is, I've found the "art" of over-clocking to be a huge mixed bag. Hardly worth the risk IMO, unless you really know what you're doing and implement all the safeguards.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2012, 04:42:44 AM by save2600 »
 

Offline bbond007

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1517
    • Show only replies by bbond007
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2012, 04:43:54 AM »
Quote from: lassie;711958
Hi i have a Apollo 1230 with 35 mhz. If i find another Apollo or someone like it, still with a 030 CPU but 50 mhz will it make my Amiga run faster and will more 3D games play better? Or does it not change so much in speed.
And what are that Overclocking someone talks about, how do they Overclock an CPU

To give you an idea... a 25mhz 040 is twice as fast as a 030-50 (the flagship 030)...

an 060 runs twice the clock speed of an 040 just for starters and has other advantages, as  save2600 already mentioned, but is not to be understated for a desktop 1200... Some 040 accelerators  are only designed for a towered 1200...

if you wanted 50mhz 030 its probably better to sell the Apollo and buy a Blizzard. I don't think MOT ever made a 35mhz 030, so its probably already overclocked :/
« Last Edit: October 19, 2012, 04:49:03 AM by bbond007 »
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2012, 04:47:45 AM »
Quote from: save2600;711959
In the simplistic example, yes - 15mhz will make a noticeable difference in OS functions and most other day to day use. Many or most things will seem improved and snappier.

If you're hoping 3D games will play leagues (or many multiples of frames) better, I'd say you'd be disappointed.

Which 3D games are we talking about? Anything that is close to the definition of modern, you're going to want an 060 processor. Skip the 040 as it runs too hot and takes more electricity = heat, unless you land one on the cheap.

Over-clocking a board and CPU like this typically results in greater heat and less stability. Be prepared to learn about cooling - if it's even an option - which is typically NOT for the average user. See if your particular CPU stamp is even capable first... then swap an oscillator (crystal) or two if it has a discrete math co-processor. Thing is, I've found the "art" of over-clocking to be a huge mixed bag. Hardly worth the risk IMO, unless you really know what you're doing and implement all the safeguards.

Hi it was game like Doom and Genetic species and Alien Breed 3D 2 i was thinking about, it could be cool if i could play them in full screen with fast speed :) but mayby it will be better with a 040 CPU.
I have tried Quake on my Apollo 1230 and it could not even run that in small screen, it was so so slow. I think i need a 060 for that game :)
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2012, 04:53:53 AM »
Quote from: bbond007;711961
To give you an idea... a 25mhz 040 is twice as fast as a 030-50 (the flagship 030)...

an 060 runs twice the clock speed of an 040 just for starters and has other advantages, as  save2600 already mentioned, but is not to be understated for a desktop 1200... Some 040 accelerators  are only designed for a towered 1200...

if you wanted 50mhz 030 its probably better to sell the Apollo and buy a Blizzard. I don't think MOT ever made a 35mhz 030, so its probably already overclocked :/


Thanks for your answer :) Yes maybe it is overclocked now, they have used glue on the RAM the one who had it before me, to put the RAM in place i think. I find it strange that someone will use glue on it :) But it runs quite fine now. Workbench loads up in seconds, and the first Doom game runs quite good, but Doom 2 is very slow with this Apollo
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2012, 04:55:34 AM »
Quote from: bbond007;711961
To give you an idea... a 25mhz 040 is twice as fast as a 030-50 (the flagship 030)...

an 060 runs twice the clock speed of an 040 just for starters and has other advantages, as  save2600 already mentioned, but is not to be understated for a desktop 1200... Some 040 accelerators  are only designed for a towered 1200...

if you wanted 50mhz 030 its probably better to sell the Apollo and buy a Blizzard. I don't think MOT ever made a 35mhz 030, so its probably already overclocked :/


HI
Are there even made 060 for Desktop Amiga 1200?
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2012, 05:13:39 AM »
All other things being equal, more megahertz is faster. Problem is, how much faster isn't exactly a linear function of clock speed. The system can burn through instructions on a 50MHz 030 42% faster than it can on a 35MHz 030, yes, but the instructions and their associated data have to get to the CPU first. Unfortunately, most Amiga accelerators were built at a time when main memory just couldn't keep up with even 35MHz, let alone 50MHz (at least not cost-effectively,) so the CPU can be kept waiting for memory to respond, and since the memory speed is relatively constant for that era, the number of cycles it wastes spinning its wheels actually increases as the clock speed goes up.

There are mitigating factors, thankfully - the 68k architecture has always tended towards longer cycle-counts for instructions anyway, so even a fast CPU isn't always going to be running up against the memory bottleneck for every instruction (especially not math-heavy stuff.) And the 030 does include a little bit of high-speed cache memory (holds frequently-accessed instructions & data, and serves as a buffer between a fast CPU and slow memory.) Still, the 030's cache is small, and very few Amiga accelerators include any additional cache, so it only helps somewhat. (This is part of why an 040 can make such a big difference, it has much more cache memory.)
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2012, 05:27:44 AM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;711965
All other things being equal, more megahertz is faster. Problem is, how much faster isn't exactly a linear function of clock speed. The system can burn through instructions on a 50MHz 030 42% faster than it can on a 35MHz 030, yes, but the instructions and their associated data have to get to the CPU first. Unfortunately, most Amiga accelerators were built at a time when main memory just couldn't keep up with even 35MHz, let alone 50MHz (at least not cost-effectively,) so the CPU can be kept waiting for memory to respond, and since the memory speed is relatively constant for that era, the number of cycles it wastes spinning its wheels actually increases as the clock speed goes up.

There are mitigating factors, thankfully - the 68k architecture has always tended towards longer cycle-counts for instructions anyway, so even a fast CPU isn't always going to be running up against the memory bottleneck for every instruction (especially not math-heavy stuff.) And the 030 does include a little bit of high-speed cache memory (holds frequently-accessed instructions & data, and serves as a buffer between a fast CPU and slow memory.) Still, the 030's cache is small, and very few Amiga accelerators include any additional cache, so it only helps somewhat. (This is part of why an 040 can make such a big difference, it has much more cache memory.)


Hi then i know why the 040 is so much faster than the 030.
I can see you have a 030 with 50 mhz :) Have you tried the first Doom on yours? and if so how fast was it
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2012, 06:05:20 AM »
Quote from: lassie;711967
I can see you have a 030 with 50 mhz :) Have you tried the first Doom on yours? and if so how fast was it
I haven't, at least not yet.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2012, 06:47:01 AM »
I had DOOM on my Blizzard IV 68030 @ 50 MHz. It is like playing Wing Commander on Amiga 500. It is playable but not very smooth and sometimes it just crawls.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2012, 06:49:16 AM »
Quote from: itix;711973
I had DOOM on my Blizzard IV 68030 @ 50 MHz. It is like playing Wing Commander on Amiga 500. It is playable but not very smooth and sometimes it just crawls.


Hi if it could get so smooth as on the PC do you think that it will take a 060 to do that?
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline runequester

  • It\'s Amiga time!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 3695
    • Show only replies by runequester
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2012, 06:52:37 AM »
On my 030/56, Alien Breed 3D, Gloom Deluxe and Genetic Species are all very playable.

Doom works but it's a bit pokey.
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2012, 06:57:02 AM »
Quote from: commodorejohn;711965

There are mitigating factors, thankfully - the 68k architecture has always tended towards longer cycle-counts for instructions anyway, so even a fast CPU isn't always going to be running up against the memory bottleneck for every instruction (especially not math-heavy stuff.) And the 030 does include a little bit of high-speed cache memory (holds frequently-accessed instructions & data, and serves as a buffer between a fast CPU and slow memory.) Still, the 030's cache is small, and very few Amiga accelerators include any additional cache, so it only helps somewhat. (This is part of why an 040 can make such a big difference, it has much more cache memory.)


Chip ram is not cached and accessing slow custom chip registers wastes most of 040's potential. Depending on application more MHz is not helping at all. For CPU intensive applications 040 is better but sometimes 030 is more performant on Amiga.

When I upgraded my Blizzard IV 030 to BlizzardPPC with 040 disk performance downgraded (using internal IDE on A1200) but viewing JPEGs was much much faster.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline lassieTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 637
    • Show only replies by lassie
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2012, 06:57:08 AM »
Quote from: runequester;711975
On my 030/56, Alien Breed 3D, Gloom Deluxe and Genetic Species are all very playable.

Doom works but it's a bit pokey.


Okay cool :) i think Genetic Species is a very good looking game.
I know that Amiga is not a 3D monster but it could be nice to show my friends that it can play some old 3D games smootly :) But i will have to save up for a bigger CPU. But those damn Amigas takes all my money as it is now :shocked:
Amiga 4000 030 18 MB ram. 16 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 030 34 MB ram. 8 Gb HD.
Amiga 1200 Tower Apollo 1240
Amiga 2000 030. 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 5 MB ram. 500 MB HD.
Amiga 2000 68000 9 MB ram. 1 Gb HD.
Amiga 600 4 MB ram. 4 GB HD.
Amiga 600 1 MB ram. 60 MB HD.
Amiga 500 1 MB ram.
Amiga 500 Plus
Amiga CD32
Amiga CD32
Commodore 64
Commodore 64C
Commodore 128
Commodore 128D
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Is more MHZ better Or?
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2012, 07:02:32 AM »
Quote from: lassie;711974
Hi if it could get so smooth as on the PC do you think that it will take a 060 to do that?


Perhaps 040 @ 40 MHz would do it but if at all possible go for 68060.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook