So, did C-USA fail to pay their $250,000 to Asiarim/Commodore Corp/whatever they're called this week and thus deprive them of funds? Is this the same C-USA that wants us to pay them in advance for new hardware? Are they still entitled to even use the Commodore name or will that need to be renegociated?
It is all very confusing.
I've consulted with numerous people regarding Commodore history since the war began between Yeahronimo and Tulip.
Yes, it's confusing, because the news reports and the truth are at odds. The whole thing started out dirty and it's ending up dirty.
Names become confusing, not just because they change them, but also because there is often a "company" name responsbible for so-called daily business and a different "licensing" name operating simultaneously for just that purpose.
Example:Asiarim-daily business (lol) and Commodore Licensing B.V. (recently declared bankrupt) responsible only for the licensing end.
Fact is if all documentation is correct, the same man was in charge of Yeahronimo, CIC, Reunite, Asiarim etc.
I am extremely suspicious of Commodorecorp and their resuscitated website as well as the information posted ON it just days ago.
I reserve the right to change my opinion, but I see a fight going on to hold onto the IP and licensing rights...and it ain't pretty.
Until I see a press release regarding outcome in the court, I'm very wary of what I read anywhere else on people's "corporate" websites.
Regarding any agreement CUSA might have had with Asiarim at the time, it is my understanding that IF there is a change in ownership of the Commodore IP, there would be a grace period to address such issues. This seems logical since ownership changes are a common occurence.
#6
