@jorkany
From your link I saw that MikeyC is at it again, feeding lies to his flock:
"Hyperion Entertainment are the legal owners to the AmigaOS. (Hopefully one day the Amiga name too - not saying they aren't already, but its all in the US courts again)
Therefore as the legitamate owners of AmigaOS - Hyperion can port it to what ever they want. Its their OS."Oh my. Well here we go again:
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/2:2007cv00631/143245/148/1.htmlDefinitions:
n. "Software" means Amiga OS 3.1, which is the Operating System (including
without limitation its Software Architecture as described in the Documentation)
originally developed, owned and marketed by Commodore Business Machines
(CBM) for their Amiga line of computers in 1994.
d. "AmigaOS 4" means the Operating System developed by Hyperion and based in
part on the Software, including without limitation the Software Architecture of the
Software as described in the Documentation, in any version (irrespective of
version numbering, e.g. AmigaOS 5).
1. Grant.
(a) Hyperion acknowledges that the Amiga Parties [read: Amiga Inc] are the owners of the Software,
without prejudice to any third parties with rights in said Software. The Amiga
Parties acknowledge that Hyperion is the sole owner of AmigaOS 4 (with the
exception[!!!] of the Software), without prejudice to any third parties with rights in
said software.
So this means in practice that Hyperion has built a house, but they did so partly by using building materials that Amiga Inc *still owns* (as they even acknowledged themselves). So Hyperion "owns" their new OS4 house, but they are not owners of the materials that the house consists of, not all the stuff that actually makes it a house. The walls, floor, ceiling and doors are still owned by Amiga Inc!
So MikeyC, this is a BIG difference from what you tried to picture over at amigans.net! Hyperion may have the right to *distribute* Amiga OS 3.1 (which they do in the "derived work" called OS4 that is said to be based on OS3.1), but they
*are not* "the legitamate owners of AmigaOS" (and given the dirty ways they used to get whatever they might have, I would say they don't even have *moral* rights to it), they even acknowledge this themselves in the very agreement that grants them their rights to use the Amiga IP. Quoted above, a copy&paste directly from the agreement, black on white!
I'm puzzled why this is so hard to understand...