Well if you were an Amiga user back in the day,you may just get why some of us DO NOT WANT x86!
Yes, because 20 years ago they were silly kids that laughed behind Intel x86 processors just because they were "the enemy" to fight. They thought Motorola 68Ks were absolutely superior, while in reality they had just some price/performance ratio advantages in SOME aspects. Processing grunt on the Intel side, however, was superior and you just had to look how a crappy 486sx/25 and a 68030 decoded a jpeg image to see what was the real winner.
Then, those silly kids had grown in oversized losers that, instead of realizing they were simply wrong at the time, continued to fight their religion war. It doesn't matter if their beloved 68k processors went out of production and their line was terminated. It doesn't matter if the next "alternative" choice (PPC) brought them nowhere. It doesn't even matter if NOTHING of the x86 processors of the times still lives in modern ones (just the IA, which has been virtualized on a pseudo-RISC hidden architecture for a decade now), or if they went 64 bits, or if they are cheaper and more powerful: what really matters for those people is just "fightin' da enemy" as usual.
I sincerely hope that all the "count me out if Amiga goes x86" people will really do that, we'll finally get rid of that bunch of fanactics. Thanks to people like them, Amiga turned from "computer for the masses" to "computer for the classes" and now survives in a tiny, forgotten market artificially kept alive by a little community and two heroic companies.