But a lot of plans are on hold UNTIL things are sorted out regarding the trademark.
And those things won't be sorted until they have negotiated and agreed to a deal.
Of course there are no PUBLIC documents available that show that Commodore USA can use the Commodore trademark legally.
That would be because they, by the websites own admission, have no such licence.
As such, any sale of C= branded machines by this company is illegal until there is a valid licence held.
I am sufficiently convinced that their usage of the trademark is legal pending negotiations for a long term license.
Then you are an even bigger tool than I took you for. If you require a licence, then until you have one, you are operating illegally. This isn't rocket science.
This agreement is an internal business matter, as it should be, and not for public consumption.
I've played this game before. Until there is a public statement to the effect agreed by both parties, CommodoreUSA's business should be considered infringing.
Yes, in some countries consumer protection laws will save your butt should it turn out that Barry has been BS'ing us all, but that does not apply to all countries.
The phrase Caveat Emptor could not be made in a better situation.
Commodore Gaming is just a licensee and not the OWNER of the Commodore trademarks, even though they seem to have represented themselves in that way to many people, which has led to a lot of misinformed speculation regarding trademark legality by the gadget press.
Citation needed. Now.
Because what you just said amounts to an accusation of criminal fraud.
Choose your next words very carefully sir.
