@gazgod
If open source were going to save the Amiga, AROS would be far better developed than AOS4.1. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm very much in favour of AROS. I just don't think that AmigaOS should follow suit.
AROS would have been far better developed if many people just opened their eyes in 1995-2005. Most amigans, however, preferred to whine about how unluck their platform was, to wait for any
deus-ex-machina god-like savior for the Amiga, to dream about "the comeback", and just ignored or even laughed behind the AROS project which was, consequently and obviously, unable to perform so many tasks: you can't write a whole OS in a month.
In the meanwhile, the whole Amiga platform suffered the progressing loss of brains and harms, which would have been really useful instead. How many good developers have we lost, for the new AmigaOS/AmigaOnes being so late? How many good developers would have we kept or attracted, if only most people helped, endorsed or at least respected the one and only community-driven effort to keep the Amiga philosophy alive and kickin'?
Today we would have a strong AROS and even stronger AmigaOS and MorphOS, since there's no motivation why the last two should have not used our code and/or solutions. People now respect AROS because Icaros has proven what it can do, because it has come to a good degree of reliability, and because it includes some of the most advanced technologies on any Amiga flavour, like Poseidon and Gallium3D: but just try to imagine what it could be, if only people did that all the time!