Would you rather have the AmigaOne X1000 or a Natami?
The X1000 is merely a low volume PC with some dead-end PPC cpu, offering 2007 level PC performance at 2011 high end workstation prices. I fail to see the exciting thing in this.
The NatAmi is really something different, it's a true continuation of Amiga HW. It won't have as much raw cpu power and it won't be as usable for real life stuff, but it will be based on true Amiga HW technologies, which it will also extend and improve.
The X1000 I won't buy because it's *pointless*; it's unproven, underpowered, ridiculously overpriced and OS4 isn't even close to MorphOS when it comes to features, performance, Amiga compatibility. The whole package is redundant, no "raison d'etre"!
The NatAmi I won't buy unless its price comes down to about half of what they have talked about. It's a truly interesting piece of HW, and I would really want one, but it's simply too much money for me to spend on a "geek gadget" of this sort.
So I'll stick with MorphOS on my 1.5GHz/64MB VRAM Mac Mini, while hoping that the MorphOS team is about to announce upcoming ARM support as their post-ppc path to the future!
