Simply because the website did not make a note of this.The only thing they said was "here is the deposition"
It really does not matter to me, the deposition was incomplete, pages missing many pages unsigned and finally any and/or all of those posted pages could have been altered in any way and we would be none the wiser.
Furthermore, I would find it very odd if Amiga Inc had decided not to include those pages they would have numbered the deposition like they did.
First of all there are lots more documents then just the recent filing in the Genesi case that includes large portions of Bill McEwens deposition. Are all the pages of the depostion made available, no only the pages concerning the lawsuit were . However the implication that the pages were altered is laughable for 3 reasons.
1) If you believe that those who got the documents from the courthouse modified them it is easy to get your own copies, feel free to do so. 2) If the lawyers for Thendic filed a falsified deposition with the courthouse, he'd be disbarred and he also would likely be criminally charged, in addition Amiga Inc could seek civil damages, so that didnt happen either and 3) Amiga Inc would have been posting about the issues with the deposition if there were any in fact there lawyer would have been legally obligated to do so.
It seems to me when you present something, you only number the presentation in sequence.
It did state in that deposition that they refused to answer some things as it was sensitive information in some way, and that by allowing that information to go public would unduly harm Amiga Inc.
First of all look at what we know is on the skipped pages, who Amiga Inc is trying to get money from, who they are trying to work deals with, for what, etc (we can get that from the front and ends of the pages we have). None of that is really pertinent to the case between Thendic and Amiga and so isnt included. If its pertinent to the case, I am sure Amiga Inc (if they file anything, and if they show up next Friday) will be presenting those pages as part of there information to the Judge.
on another posting, AMiga Inc may be crooks, they may have scammed everyone with thier coupon scheme, however there are two sides to every story, the court cases are not finalized, and OS4 is not yet released for them to make good on thier promises.
Until these things happen I believe judgement should be reserved ( I believe the catchcry is innocent until proven guilty). Should we trust them? Definately not!
The Thendic court case isnt decided, though we are going to hear something next week, but Bolten, Matt, Airborne, the Landlord, all those cases have all been decided and all not in favor of Amiga Inc. There isnt two sides on those cases, they went to court, Amiga didnt show up, they won their cases, Amiga still hasnt paid them. Plus frankly with Amiga Inc racking up debt of over 100K in virtual salaries a month, plus thousands on interest on actual judgements, theres not alot more to say. 50 days ago, Bill McEwen said that new funding was days away, (much like he has said in letters to lawyers and judges for over a year now) guess what, it hasnt happened, and I'm guessing its not terribly likely to happen at all.
-Tig
