Amiga Inc auctioning off office and computers?

[Desmon]

@Wayne

Sitting here thinking about this, and going back through the posts regarding the subject when they vehemently denied losing their offices, stating only that they have "relocated", I wonder if anyone will actually apologize to me for all the times I've been called a liar for bringing this stuff to the community's attention?

Sorry. No apologies from here. But then I have nothing to apologise to you for.

 Cache Ya,
 Craig.

[Damion]

@Bodie

If you're worried, just wait until OS4 is
out before you get it.

[Bodie]

@Desom

I think you got confused by the avatars :-D . (Ie bootdisk and hmetal)...  Don't worry I thought the same thing :-D .

[alx]

I cannot see hmetal saying:

I figured this new Amiga venture was doomed from the get-go anyway. Pity the Amy couldn't have found a death with dignity.

In fact, he's only replied on the ANN thread - A inc have been fairly silent.  But it looks like Amigaworld.net are going to ask fleecy.

[SlimJim]

@Paul Gadd
 

Do you think that Q&A is rigged? (i do)

 
Rigged huh? From the (upcoming) Q&A:
 

 
4) Tigger: Where you unaware of what Bill McEwen was going to say in the Bolten Peck case about not being the CEO, or were you intentionally misleading the Amiga Community with your post that Bill McEwen was still the CEO??

You guys simply have no idea what you are talking about -
or do want to claim Tigger is asking an easy-peachy "I love
fleecy" question here?
.
SlimJim

[greenboy]

"A inc have been fairly silent"

You just noticed? Like, on public forums until "ask fleevy" came along Amiga Inc - with the singular exception of Ray - hasn't said jack for ages and a day. The stock answer is probably that they are too busy ... I'm guessing this is because without the floor waxer they have to get down on hands and knees and do it the old-fashoned way.

[Desmon]

@Bodie

I think you got confused by the avatars  . (Ie bootdisk and hmetal)... Don't worry I thought the same thing.

Thanks for pointing that out.

I still don't owe Wayne an apology.  :-D

 Cache Ya,
 Craig.

[Paul_Gadd]

@SlimJim

Moss gets easy questions, anyone can type hard questions but they NEVER get passed on and as for Tiggers question will that get answered? i doubt it.

10 weeks of easy questions, either rigged or that is some coincidence, the wool can not be pulled over everyones eyes.

[DaveP]

@SlimJim

That still does not mean that Paul is incorrect, it could
fall into category #2 of my three possible rigging scenarios ( Fleecy sayes he can answer it - and the pressure to answer an adverse question is there ).

You can answer that without resorting to "you guys don't know what you are talking about" or "fleecy loving" ( which no one suggested ).

Regards

Dave.

[Warface]

IRC Hyperion clarified in public that if AInc went tits-up.com then they had the full rights to continue to develop AOS beyond AOS4.

Just as Haage und Partner holds right to OS3.9. That's why Hyperion couldn't use the 3.9 sources for OS4. So it's not that "good thing from all sides".

[alx]

I'd expect Fleecy would definitely be asked about it.  I doubt that it'll be in the wording that Tigger used as that only gave three fairly similar options.

[SlimJim]

@Paul Gadd
 
Well the question IS put forward to fleecy this week.
Perhaps your criteria for a "hard" question is more
constrained than mine, but I would consider this to be a
"hard question". If fleecy chooses not to answer it, it will
say "No comment" below. How does that make the
question in itself "rigged"?
 
@DaveP
 
Mr. Gadd proposed that only questions in the vein of
"Fleecy your amazing can i have your autograph?" are the
ones that would be asked whereas harder ones
vanish. I summarized this attitude as only "fleecy loving"
questions was assumed, and presented an example I felt
contradicted that claim. I stand by my feel that many in
here haven't got the slightest idea what they are talking
about but bash the Q&A just for the sake of it. If you felt
included in that group, it will have to stand for you, but it
was not my intention.
.
SlimJim

[DaveP]

@SlimJim

Fair enough. But unless there was completely random selection of the questions then the system is open from everything to mild bias right through to "rigging".

I understand now where the Fleecy Loving came from.

[KennyR]

Oh well. Hopefully this will be the last Amiga company with no products and only the name. I've watched them come and go since '94. Time to carve another notch.

[KennyR]

I would think the Q&A is rigged. If it wasn't, it would consist almost entirely of trolly questions from Darth_X. ;-)

[Warface]

Oh well. Hopefully this will be the last Amiga company with no products and only the name. I've watched them come and go since '94. Time to carve another notch.

They haven't gone bankrupt yet. We'll see. (What more damage can they make?)

Damn, as for the PPC OS split is one thing, but splitting the amiga.org community... That was a real ugly move.