Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Eyetech CEO Clarifies AmigaOne/OS4.0 Announcement  (Read 13467 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Chathurawind

  • Guest
Re: Eyetech CEO Clarifies AmigaOne/OS4.0 Announcement
« Reply #74 from previous page: April 18, 2002, 04:01:31 PM »
hell seehund,

If you are so against AmigaINC and thier stratagies then why do you bother?

Anyone who wants the AmigaONE for using Amiga programs seems to have no problem with the idea of getting the OS with the MB. The only people who seem to have a problem with this idea is the peple who want to use it for other OS's ie Linux (although why when x86 solutions are far cheaper)

You say you that MS is only protecting it's own product, but so is AI, surely you can see that. By making sure that you can only use OS4 on approved HW you can make sure that piracy is at a minimum. Not to mention the fact that approved HW and SW solutions normally mean that the machine is far more stable as all the programs have to conform to the correct standards and be OS legal.

I for one have no problem getting the OS and MB together as I suspect a majority of Amiga users don't mind either. We are simply happy that the Amiga is comming back on some resonably decent hardware.
 

Offline Seehund

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1230
    • Show only replies by Seehund
    • http://AmigaPOP.8bit.co.uk/
Re: Eyetech CEO Clarifies AmigaOne/OS4.0 Announcement
« Reply #75 on: April 18, 2002, 05:56:20 PM »
Jesus Christ on a Bicycle!

Anonymous wrote:
Quote
If you are so against AmigaINC and thier stratagies then why do you bother?

I'm not against Amiga Inc. (only moron trolls find factions where there shouldn't be any and take sides for or against companies and individuals merely based on their names), but I'm against their strategies and methods in this case. I bother because I'd like to buy Amiga OS and since I liked previous versions of the Amiga OS I have hopes that OS4 will be good. I was hoping we'd no longer be tied to only specific hardware from (a) specific compan(y|ies), since Amiga Inc. has fsck all to do with hardware.


Quote
Anyone who wants the AmigaONE for using Amiga programs seems to have no problem with the idea of getting the OS with the MB.

Of course they don't! The A1G3-SE is just one piece of hardware only available from one specific distributor. Why on earth would somebody planning to run OS4 have a problem with the OS coming bundled in that one specific case?

Maybe this could be the last time I'll have to repeat this in this thread: There is no "Amiga". Nobody makes Amigas. Nobody will be making Amigas. The A1G3-SE is irrelevant to the points I'm trying to make. It should be just yet another piece of hardware from just yet another distributor.

Quote
The only people who seem to have a problem with this idea is the peple who want to use it for other OS's ie Linux (although why when x86 solutions are far cheaper)

Did you really read the executive update? Did you read Alan Redhouse's and Ben Herman's "clarifications"? Did you read the posts in this very thread of the user you're replying to?
Why the fsck would non-AmigaOS users have a problem with this? They can buy whatever hardware compatible with their OS they bloody well want. They can even buy "Amiga licensed" hardware bundled with Amiga OS and run another OS on if they were insane and would like to pay more for their hardware. We who want AmigaOS can't choose our own hardware and whom we will buy it from. That's the problem.

Quote
You say you that MS is only protecting it's own product, but so is AI, surely you can see that.

Of course I can see that. AI just chose a completely brain-dead solution to the piracy problem, which will hurt us who want to buy Amiga OS, us who will have to buy only licensed hardware and the PPC market and development rate, and ultimately Amiga Inc. The pirates will circumvent a silly ROM protection anyway, if they'll bother with a doomed tiny market at all.


Quote
Not to mention the fact that approved HW and SW solutions normally mean that the machine is far more stable as all the programs have to conform to the correct standards and be OS legal.

If you had read my posts you'd have seen that I agree that this would be fine and dandy. Compulsory licensing and compulsory OS/hardware bundling is NOT.

If there are two identical motherboards available from
1. A licensed distributor, bundled with the OS
and
2. Everybody else
then I would go for the "everybody else" category and buy my OS separately if that meant it would be cheaper and if I hadn't had that option taken away from me by AI.
If I wanted guaranteed support and whatever other advantages I might get from the licensed dealer and if cost was no concern for me I'd buy it from him.
The thing is that now I have only the licensed dealer to "choose" from, and if there's no licensed dealer offering this motherboard I can't get the hardware I want at all.

Quote
I for one have no problem getting the OS and MB together as I suspect a majority of Amiga users don't mind either. We are simply happy that the Amiga is comming back on some resonably decent hardware.

"The Amiga" isn't coming back, thank God! The Amiga OS is updated and ported to run on PPC hardware.
I and a majority of Amiga OS users would have no problem buying the OS together with the hardware. I just don't want to be restricted to the hardware and distributors AI dictates.
*sigh*

Sorry for any harsh tone above, but it's annoying to repeatedly reply to someone who clearly hasn't tried to comprehend what was written previously in the thread, and having to repeat yourself. Well, that someone being anonymous doesn't help either...
[color=0000FF]Maybe it\\\'s still possible to [/color]save AmigaOS [color=0000FF][/size][/color]  :rtfm:......
 

Offline jumpship

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 781
    • Show only replies by jumpship
    • http://onlyamiga.kicks-ass.net
Re: Eyetech CEO Clarifies AmigaOne/OS4.0 Announcement
« Reply #76 on: April 18, 2002, 07:37:27 PM »
Seehund,

I for one see your point. Although it does sound as if AI will only be selling the OS with the HW, at first that shouldn't be a problem, after all we only really have the AOne or PEG and we all need the OS when we get the motherboard. But what if I decide to, say in a year or so time, upgrade my motherboard with the latest G4/G5 or whatever...

Am I going to have to get another copy of the OS with my new motherboard? :-o Does seem silly if I already have a legal copy of it when I get my A1!!

Maybe I should wait to see if I can walk b4 I start to run, but I do think that we need to clarify if a new updated AOne (ATwo?! LOL) comes out if we will be forced into getting the latest OS with it, or if we can simply re-use our current legal copy of OS4.0  :-?
 

Offline Kronos

  • Resident blue troll
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4017
    • Show only replies by Kronos
    • http://www.SteamDraw.de
Re: Eyetech CEO Clarifies AmigaOne/OS4.0 Announcement
« Reply #77 on: April 18, 2002, 09:07:08 PM »
Quote
after all we only really have the AOne or PEG and we all need the OS when we get the motherboard.


Well some people (like me) may want to try that other os first
and may decide later to put AOS4 on it as dual-boot.

BtW: I don't believe any of this legal-FUD and you should
remember that Ben H. is cleary advocatings AIncs pointofview.
Lawyers for the other side may have a different one.
(thats why courts and judges are needed in a legal system).

I really hope (but don't believe) this "war" would be fought over
features, reliablity and apps.
 
1. Make an announcment.
2. Wait a while.
3. Check if it can actually be done.
4. Wait for someone else to do it.
5. Start working on it while giving out hillarious progress-reports.
6. Deny that you have ever announced it
7. Blame someone else