DonnyEMU wrote:
The pictures you are showing me are frauds. I still own an original A1000 with a 1985 manufacturing date..This isn't millitary spec chips, these pictures you are showing me aren't even what the real chips look like, they are advertising fakery. I have a stack of old Amiga Worlds with that same ad. As a dealer/repair center from 85-92 I saw a lot of these machines.
For further proof: anyone care to count the number of pins on Agnes,Denise, and Paula then count the number of pins on those chips in the AD and get back to me. It sure makes a cool looking ad though.. The plate over the chips in this ad is a simple 79 cent glue on from MOS.. I have seen the innards of plenty A1000s to know what I am looking at.
http://amiga.org/gallery/images/896/1_1183.jpgHm, someone must've gone through some trouble, then. 48-pin DIPs in both shots. Unless I can't count. And you can see here that they got the 8361 (that also doesn't exist?) into a regular epoxy package.
The 'heatspreaders' are obviously just cheap caps of some sort - I've found some other pictures where they weren't on straight. But IIRC, with this sort of package, the chip die was otherwise exposed (I dunno why; because they encased the pins in the ceramic before they dropped the chip in and connected the cat-whiskers? -- Were chip packages coming from separate plants than chips themselves? -- Or because the same package would have a use for UV EEPROM, those would need a window there anyway, and it would be cheaper to use caps than design an all-ceramic top with a hollow for the chip? Or because engineers would enjoy the ability to pop the cap and microscope failure modes on returned units without sanding/etching off the epoxy as they do now?)... So the cap keeps you from, say, jabbing the die with your finger, or getting WD-40 all over it when you decide to clean your board. (Or was there epoxy under there, anyway?) Ever dissect one of those old calculators, where the LEDs were exposed dies under a plastic magnifying lens?
One assumes the miracle of 100% plastic/epoxy packaging caught on quickly when it was discovered how much easier it was to just pour goo over everything. (Of course, bad epoxy still strikes. All the Fujitsu drive failures of months back were eventually traced to a bad packaging used by Cirrus Logic, to whom they'd outsourced some chips.)
Now why does everyone need to bullshit over something so simple?