Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM  (Read 13534 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #44 on: November 23, 2008, 12:21:36 PM »
@Gebrochen
Quote
I know one can do it on other platforms, but, is it a simple case of right clicking, renaming the volume.(read next sentence first)

Yes. Even easier. For example with Mac OS X you just doubleclick the label and type the new name.



Quote
then when you restart the computer, does that OS remember what you had named that usb Stick volume??

There is nothing for the OS to remember. The filesystem has been relabeled, of course the new name will appear. This works with every OS that has USB, massstorage and FAT support.
 

Offline kolla

Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #45 on: November 23, 2008, 02:51:13 PM »
Quote

paolone wrote:

3. Since I use both AROS and AmigaOS 4.1 I can see their pros and they cons. There are things better done in AmigaOS 4.1, but also things that were better made on AROS. For istance, try to place a PC cdrom on both operating systems, and while in AmigaOS you'll be forced to choose "all files" view in the Window menu, AROS will choose this view automatically, due to a precise design decision took while developing it (AROS uses view > all files on any volume that has no amiga disk.icon file in its root - this will be helpful when Michal has completed his mass storage bounty too).


Well, gee... you need a bounty to change envarc:sys/def_disk.info? :roll:
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline kolla

Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #46 on: November 23, 2008, 02:57:49 PM »
Quote

Piru wrote:
Yes. Even easier. For example with Mac OS X you just doubleclick the label and type the new name.



There is nothing for the OS to remember. The filesystem has been relabeled, of course the new name will appear. This works with every OS that has USB, massstorage and FAT support.


I dont find double-clicking the labelname particularly intuitive, and looking from the accidently renamed files/volumes I find on other people's macs, it's not really usefull.

Anyhow... what I really like with amiga systems, is that you can remove a device with programs still open on it, the OS wont panick, nor will it kill the programs or anything other nasty stuff. It will just ask the user to insert the disk/whatever when needed, recognise it and move on. Try that with windows, OSX, linux etc.
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #47 on: November 23, 2008, 03:03:12 PM »
Quote

kolla wrote:
Quote

Piru wrote:
Yes. Even easier. For example with Mac OS X you just doubleclick the label and type the new name.



There is nothing for the OS to remember. The filesystem has been relabeled, of course the new name will appear. This works with every OS that has USB, massstorage and FAT support.


I dont find double-clicking the labelname particularly intuitive, and looking from the accidently renamed files/volumes I find on other people's macs, it's not really usefull.

Anyhow... what I really like with amiga systems, is that you can remove a device with programs still open on it, the OS wont panick, nor will it kill the programs or anything other nasty stuff. It will just ask the user to insert the disk/whatever when needed, recognise it and move on. Try that with windows, OSX, linux etc.


Only the AmigaOS designers felt the need for offline filesystems... AROS supports this feature too...

While I miss the feature, which I'm used to from the Amiga days... I'm not sure it's actually a useful feature anymore... and is actually somewhat inconsistent design...

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #48 on: November 23, 2008, 03:06:02 PM »
by drHirudo on 2008/11/20 10:30:52

Quote
Dammy, let me tell you something. These boards are Amigas.


In that case, my ASUS mobos are Amigas.  They run AF quiet nicely and it's an official Licensed product of Amiga Inc.   :roll:

Dammy
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline kolla

Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #49 on: November 23, 2008, 03:13:56 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:

Only the AmigaOS designers felt the need for offline filesystems... AROS supports this feature too...

While I miss the feature, which I'm used to from the Amiga days... I'm not sure it's actually a useful feature anymore... and is actually somewhat inconsistent design...


Obviously you dont own gadgets that people around you feel they need to have a look at. I can tell you, owning a linux phone or pda with mounted memory card is a  f*in PITA.

I also very often want to just rip out usb devices without having to dismount.. oh no busy, close program, still busy, change cwd of a shell... finally not busy, dismount, rip out. Really, i find this issue a total mess on all so called modern systems.
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline pixie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 481
    • Show only replies by pixie
    • http://savoc.tripod.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #50 on: November 23, 2008, 08:26:06 PM »
@bloodline:
Quote
While I miss the feature, which I'm used to from the Amiga days... I'm not sure it's actually a useful feature anymore... and is actually somewhat inconsistent design...


If program is on memory why do the os should care if it is on it's physical location? And while we're here why the hell I'm forbiden to open the same pic on several apps? Evolution?


pixie- writing from a paradise called Portugal
 

Offline orb85750

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1237
    • Show only replies by orb85750
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #51 on: November 23, 2008, 10:18:34 PM »
Yes, I'm one of those former Amiga users, and my renewed interest has continued to build over the last year or so.  There's so much good work going on in Amiga world (but not by the trademark holder, apparently) that a revival seems to be in place.  It is very exciting.  The more work that is done, the more interest will be generated -- and soon noticed by computer publications too?  Could be huge.  Hope so.


Quote

Atheist wrote:
Quote
Amithony wrote:

It looks like the Amiga will be around for a long time to come yet.

Hi Amithony,

Errr, yeah?

I was going to start a thread about that actually, you may want to.

I can't believe the amount of people that are posting with "join" dates of year 2007 and 2008, here and on AmigaWorld.Net.

Add to that, the amount of people in the last short while who are posting with join dates of 3 and more years ago, and they have under 100 posts, and many with even less than 20!!!!


Anyone else notice?
 

Offline AeroMan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 342
    • Show only replies by AeroMan
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #52 on: November 24, 2008, 12:15:31 AM »

Quote

Atheist wrote:


Errr, yeah?

I was going to start a thread about that actually, you may want to.

I can't believe the amount of people that are posting with "join" dates of year 2007 and 2008, here and on AmigaWorld.Net.

Add to that, the amount of people in the last short while who are posting with join dates of 3 and more years ago, and they have under 100 posts, and many with even less than 20!!!!


Anyone else notice?



I´ve joined Amiga.org in 2007, but I´ve been driving an Amiga since 92, and I´ve been a fan since the days I was programming my Sinclair and bought my first Your Sinclair magazine that had an Amiga ad.

It means, I just discovered Aorg last year. I was lost, it saved me!!
 :-D
 

Offline paolone

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 382
    • Show only replies by paolone
    • http://www.icarosdesktop.org
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #53 on: November 24, 2008, 09:15:17 AM »
Quote
If program is on memory why do the os should care if it is on it's physical location? And while we're here why the hell I'm forbiden to open the same pic on several apps? Evolution?


No, it's the simple need to avoid that program A could modify the file X using an older version, since program B has already modified it before (and program A is not aware of this change by program B). Programs making changes to important files should always lock them while they're open. This might be not true for all kind of files. For istance, when I modify a HTML page with FrontPage, I can open it both with IE and Firefox. But there is a little difference between an editor and a viewer: the latter is not supposed to modify the file.
p.bes

 

Offline AmithonyTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 308
    • Show only replies by Amithony
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #54 on: November 24, 2008, 10:58:07 AM »
Quote


Hi Amithony,

Errr, yeah?

I was going to start a thread about that actually, you may want to.

I can't believe the amount of people that are posting with "join" dates of year 2007 and 2008, here and on AmigaWorld.Net.

Add to that, the amount of people in the last short while who are posting with join dates of 3 and more years ago, and they have under 100 posts, and many with even less than 20!!!!


Anyone else notice?


The tide is starting to change. I cant wait to get my SAM. As long as it has OS4.1 it is good enough to be an Amiga to me. Walk, talk and quack like a duck. But runs like a roadrunner. Bring it on! :)
 

Offline drHirudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 539
    • Show only replies by drHirudo
    • http://hirudov.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #55 on: November 24, 2008, 11:26:49 AM »
Vesalia changed the ETA for SAM boards to December 2008. First it was November 21st, next it changed to November 26, and now December. The people who bought them back in September are lucky to have the boards now. The rest have to wait :( I wonder how many SAM boards are manufactured now? I hope more than thousand.

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #56 on: November 24, 2008, 08:32:21 PM »
Perhaps they made as many as 50 in the first batch? And now another 50?
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #57 on: November 24, 2008, 08:51:29 PM »
Quote

pixie wrote:
@bloodline:
Quote
While I miss the feature, which I'm used to from the Amiga days... I'm not sure it's actually a useful feature anymore... and is actually somewhat inconsistent design...


If program is on memory why do the os should care if it is on it's physical location? And while we're here why the hell I'm forbiden to open the same pic on several apps? Evolution?



Different and unrelated issue. You are speaking of "File Locks", I am speaking about off line file systems.

Offline jahc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 521
    • Show only replies by jahc
    • http://wookiechat.amigarevolution.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #58 on: November 24, 2008, 11:15:51 PM »
Quote
In that case, my ASUS mobos are Amigas. They run AF quiet nicely and it's an official Licensed product of Amiga Inc.

Well the difference is that WinUAE is emulation.. but still, if I had an Amithlon box, I'd probably refer to it as "my Amiga" too.

And btw.. if anyone wants to use IRC from AROS, WookieChat is available :)
(Just set the stack correctly, for some reason AROS doesnt take the stack value from the icon :(
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12114
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #59 from previous page: November 24, 2008, 11:47:59 PM »
Quote

jahc wrote:
Quote
In that case, my ASUS mobos are Amigas. They run AF quiet nicely and it's an official Licensed product of Amiga Inc.

Well the difference is that WinUAE is emulation.. but still, if I had an Amithlon box, I'd probably refer to it as "my Amiga" too.


With all due respect here... but really what makes the difference between emulation and native now...?

I say this as someone who loves to fire up his A500 and marvel at what those Crazy Amiga guys managed back exactly 20 years ago today...

But for serious usage... well you know what I mean :-)