@seer
> Like I said, neither party suplied any proof that what they said was
> true, that means that neither the original poster nor Elbox gave any proof.
Well, Qwe released a tool to decode the driver and see for yourself.
>> Now, excuse me, that's stupid. You really think that if this account was faked, the "real" Chris Hodges wouldn't immediately cry out and tell Wayne that there's a fake account of him?
>
>It's not that. AFAIK, I never spoken with you before, so I don't know you. If you had more posts (and if I read them offcourse) I could make a judgement on wheter I would just take your word for it or not.
Normally, I don't take much part in these news forums -- most of it is a lot of time wasted.
> People like Coder, Redrumloa Kronos have a somewhat high post count and everybody here knows them and in a way how they think about certain thinks.
Sure. I do post to amiga-news.de or ann.lu a bit more often than on amiga.org.
>> I really cannot help you then. I'll give it up. Believe whatever is easier for you to believe.
>
> It wasn't meant as an offensive.
Neither from me. I didn't feel offended, rather just... well, like talking
to a wall that's always in doubt. I feel a bit exhausted, you see. Like all
this discussion leading nowhere (because we both have our opions and won't
let us persuade or deceive ourselfs -- which is actually a GoodThing(TM) ).
> But to conclude. If you say the RDB is thrashed after the Elbox code is triggered then I'll take your word for it. Enough typed about this I think.
I hope so. Going on much too long now

> On a different but not OT note; are you giving Elbox the rights back to
> distribute your software now they claim the offensive code is taken out ?
usb.device version with the offending code removed will remain working, but
no, distibution rights will not be regained by denying having done
something wrong and illegal and not apologizing, or offending me and
calling me a cracker or pirate. You see, I do not trust Elbox anymore and
co-operation has to be based on trust first.