Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?  (Read 17994 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rockstarTopic starter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2005
  • Posts: 8
    • Show only replies by rockstar
DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« on: November 24, 2005, 12:26:08 PM »
I'm considering buying one of those for my A1200 since the Blizzard 1230's are so expensive.

The primary reason I want a 030 is that I want to run OS 3.9.

Should I go for the Blizzard 1230 or the Cobra? What is a reasonable price for the Cobra?
 

Offline Argus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 942
    • Show only replies by Argus
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2005, 12:34:27 PM »
There's a reason for the price difference, other than MHz.  The DKB boards needed a firmware update to run OS3.1.  So with the Cobra, unless you are lucky to find one with the update, will have you stuck in OS3.0.  Then you'd need to figure out some clever way of soft-kicking into 3.1 so you could install 3.9.  I've never done it, maybe someone here has found a way?  My advice, bite the bullet and get a Blizzard MarkIV (or better yet a Blizz1260).  btw, since BlizzardPPCs with 68060s seem to be fetching only around $350-400US right now on eBay, you might want to bite a little harder, pay roughly double what you'd pay for a 68030 and have a real monster A1200 (provided your not limiting yourself to just an A1200 desktop original).
posted on A2500+ C=2620 14MHz/8MbFast/1MbChip
dialed in @34K
Just livin\\\' the dream...
 

Offline prowler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2002
  • Posts: 182
    • Show only replies by prowler
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2005, 03:33:13 PM »
I was probably unlucky but I bought a DKB Cobra years ago for my A1200 (around the mod 90's). I found it to be extremely flaky and particular with it's seating in the trap door slot. I would get a lot yellow screens on power on/reboot as well as random lock ups. Take the card out, all worked well (except I was stuck with a 020/2Meg 1200).

It eventually stopped working about 1-2 years ago so I recently bought a Blizzard 1230 off EBay and have had no problems at all, which was a realief since I always had a nigling worry that there was something wrong with the 1200 causing the problems. I am now planning on getting hold of some 3.1 ROMs to get 3.9 onto the machine now.
 

Offline spihunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1501
    • Show only replies by spihunter
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2005, 04:55:28 PM »
I had one of these in my A1200 for years. I never had a problem with it. It was the scsi ad-on board that was really flaky.
 

Offline kevh100

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 52
    • Show only replies by kevh100
    • http://www.kphonline.co.uk
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2005, 05:40:40 PM »
My 030@33Mhz with 68882 FPU and 64mb SIMM are still going strong today, god knows how many years after buying it. I'd buy one again :)

Kev
...
 

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2005, 06:15:39 PM »
I'm a real Phase5 fan, first turbo was a Blizzard1230MK3. But between that and my BlizzardPPC040 (later sold and now currently own a Blizzard1260 and a Blizzard1230MK4) I owned a rubbish Apollo1230/50 that would never work well (often lockup and guru for no apparent reason no matter hom much I tinkered with it) and a Cobra1230/33.

I belive the Cobra is a very nice card as long as you get a 3.1 compatible card and stick to the 33Mhz version (none EC CPU / Overclocked). Mine ran fine and was only replaced cause I involved myself in a maximum uppgrade mission for the A1200 and for that needed a PPC and GFX card solution. :-D

If you find a 33Mhz version that is 3.1 compatible and negotiate right you'll probably be able to get it for about 25$... but stay away from the overclocked 28Mhz version and the only EC 40Mhz version.

Offline motrucker

Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2005, 07:51:57 PM »
Odd mix of answers here. I have always had very good luck with all DKB stuff. I still use an '030 (40MHz I believe) with a 32 Mb simm that runs OS 3.5 with no trouble at all in my A1200. (I may upgrade to 3.9 some day) I even use the DKB SCSI with good luck (it is a pain to connected correctly, but once it is, it works well).
Good luck filtering through all this......

A2000 GVP 40MHz \'030, 21Mb RAM SD/FF, 2 floppies, internal CD-ROM drive, micromys v3 w/laser mouse
A1000 Microbotics Starboard II w/2Mb 1080, & external floppy (AIRdrive)
C-128 w/1571, 1750, & Final Cartridge III+
 

Offline soyeb

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2026
  • Posts: 1
  • Country: gb
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by soyeb
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2026, 12:02:29 AM »
20 years late, but you may still be interested.  The DKB Cobra 030 was my first accelerator.  I'm not sure if it was a 28MHz or 33MHz, but whichever it was, it worked well for me.  I later went through many other accelerators, but the DKB was the most reliable along with an Apollo 1240.
 

Offline AmigaSource

  • AmigaSource.com
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 107
  • Country: us
  • Thanked: 4 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by AmigaSource
    • amigasource.com
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2026, 12:58:50 AM »
  Yup..  20 yrs late too.   My first accelerator too although I first started with their DKB 1202 board.  (https://amiga.resource.cx/exp/dkb1202).  Simple memory, FPU and RTC upgrade.  Ahh those were the days.  8MB and you though you were a KING!

 FWIW I had nothing but good times with mine!  I had the accompanying Ferret SCSI board (https://amiga.resource.cx/exp/ferret) and it always worked GREAT! I used it with my external SCSI CD-ROM, Connor DAT drive (used AMI-Back, Diavolo and Quarterback) and a random SCSI flatbed or two.

  I seem to remember at some point having some technical issues, mailing it back to DKB, and corresponded with Dean Brown during the repair process.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2026, 01:00:00 AM by AmigaSource »
Please visit AmigaSource.com!!! Since 2001... Your NEW source for Amiga information. *** Always Under Construction *** (Over 5000+ Amiga links for your viewing pleasure! -- Please help spread the word!)
 

Offline PlatformerZ

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2021
  • Posts: 68
  • Country: au
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Hebdomadal
    • Show only replies by PlatformerZ
Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2026, 08:26:57 AM »
started with a 1202 around 2016 then a DKB Cobra 40Mhz card. Bought locally it was a good solid card with FPU. Luckily it was the updated rom version.

Around 2020 I was interested in the icomp ACA cards for their SYSInfo CPU and RAM performance. Mainly because that was the trend in forums at the time.

IDEFix scsi patch rapidly enhanced IDE = HDD CF transfer times and also the Cobra rom has a serious bottleneck in that department, giving around 800kbs IDE speed while ACA cards were 2.2Mbs up to 4.4Mbs with IDEFix. The IDEFix hardware shows even greater figures up to 6-8Mbs.

It's hype though and I was caught up in the culture of it.

   
 

Offline Boing-ball

Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2026, 01:00:08 PM »
Holy Thread resurrection Batman!  ;D

The one and only 030 classic accelerator was and still is the Phase 5 1230. 50mhz 030 upto 128MB RAM. Then buy and add a SCSI 2 add on with DMA and another 128MB RAM. Maprom functionality etc..



 

Offline kolla

Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2026, 02:36:03 AM »
Phase 5 Blizzard 1230 IV that is, the earlier models are not so great.
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline screwtop

Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #12 on: August 05, 2026, 12:43:03 AM »
Since we're discussing them: I've been using my Cobra again since getting a second A1200 (my first 1200 got a Blizzard 1260 upgrade in the late '90s and the Cobra then went into storage). It's a 28 MHz model with a 33 MHz 68882 and 8 MB Fast RAM also installed (I have previously used 16 MB and 64 MB SIMMs with it), no SCSI.

It's been solid and stable overall. I've experimented with overclocking the CPU, which requires desoldering the oscillator, and if you use bare socket pins to hold the replacement you must be careful to insulate the metal shell of the oscillator lest it short the 5 V supply! It mostly runs fine at 33 MHz but hangs after a Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga keyboard reset (while troubleshooting I noticed dual pulses on the _KB_RESET line but this is apparently normal). Reinstating a 28 MHz oscillator seems to have fixed that; the stock crystal is 28.63636 MHz (NTSC) but I had a spare PAL 28.37516 MHz one and the machine is PAL otherwise. I guess it's picky about timings. Notably, the firmware can be updated (see http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/cobra) with variants for 28 MHz, 40 MHz, and 50 MHz CPU clock speeds and 70 or 80 ns RAM timing, so I think the timing in the glue logic is fairly critical. The 68030 is actually a 20 MHz part but presumably is run at 28 MHz to keep things synchronous with the Amiga chipset.

You can run the FPU at a different clock speed from the CPU without issues (there's a socket for a second oscillator and a jumper for this). The MapROM function (hardware jumper plus software) is effective.

Mine did develop a fault where the real-time clock was failing to keep time and the battery was draining rapidly. This turned out to be due to a bent pin on one of the ICs that was shorting against the battery holder! It might have got bent during installation one time.

I see IDE-CF speeds of around 1.6 MB/s in SysInfo but haven't tried any IDE speed patches on this machine.
 

Offline Boing-ball

Re: DKB Cobra 030@28 - any good?
« Reply #13 on: August 05, 2026, 03:58:26 PM »
Since we're discussing them: I've been using my Cobra again since getting a second A1200 (my first 1200 got a Blizzard 1260 upgrade in the late '90s and the Cobra then went into storage). It's a 28 MHz model with a 33 MHz 68882 and 8 MB Fast RAM also installed (I have previously used 16 MB and 64 MB SIMMs with it), no SCSI.

It's been solid and stable overall. I've experimented with overclocking the CPU, which requires desoldering the oscillator, and if you use bare socket pins to hold the replacement you must be careful to insulate the metal shell of the oscillator lest it short the 5 V supply! It mostly runs fine at 33 MHz but hangs after a Ctrl-Amiga-Amiga keyboard reset (while troubleshooting I noticed dual pulses on the _KB_RESET line but this is apparently normal). Reinstating a 28 MHz oscillator seems to have fixed that; the stock crystal is 28.63636 MHz (NTSC) but I had a spare PAL 28.37516 MHz one and the machine is PAL otherwise. I guess it's picky about timings. Notably, the firmware can be updated (see http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/cobra) with variants for 28 MHz, 40 MHz, and 50 MHz CPU clock speeds and 70 or 80 ns RAM timing, so I think the timing in the glue logic is fairly critical. The 68030 is actually a 20 MHz part but presumably is run at 28 MHz to keep things synchronous with the Amiga chipset.

You can run the FPU at a different clock speed from the CPU without issues (there's a socket for a second oscillator and a jumper for this). The MapROM function (hardware jumper plus software) is effective.

Mine did develop a fault where the real-time clock was failing to keep time and the battery was draining rapidly. This turned out to be due to a bent pin on one of the ICs that was shorting against the battery holder! It might have got bent during installation one time.

I see IDE-CF speeds of around 1.6 MB/s in SysInfo but haven't tried any IDE speed patches on this