Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CV64/3D vs CV64  (Read 2689 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zipper

Re: CV64/3D vs CV64
« Reply #14 from previous page: March 24, 2005, 05:10:52 PM »
Quote

jlariv8957 wrote:
Hi,

 but don't expect play games that use native modes !


In my tests years ago I got about 40% success rate for games and fakenative P96 modes. Did not work for F1GP, which I was interested in :-(
 

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: CV64/3D vs CV64
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2005, 05:50:13 PM »
As the CV3D doesn't have monitor switcher I would get a CV64. You don't really need a flicker fixer because your A3k already has one, the CV64 has the fastest zorro3 bus access and these cards should be quite cheap :-)
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)
 

Offline fx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 347
  • Country: se
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by fx
    • UHC Tools
Re: CV64/3D vs CV64
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2005, 08:04:38 PM »
One thing I thought I'd mention, the CV64 has way better picture quality than the CV643D, I switched my CV643D to a CV64 mostly because of the picture quality and also because it's faster. The 3D part of the CV643D really sucks and you can use the CV643D scandoubler with the CV64 card (if you own an A4000 as I do that is pretty nice).

Only reason I see for getting a CV643D instead of a CV64 is that they're usually cheaper.
Slightly bored and severly confused..