klesterjr: At that point, Hyperion can get back to porting games, where there IS potential for a small profit -- and the SAME users can be marketed to again & again.
Didn't they have to take a few breaks from working on OS4 and do other projects?
Wayne: Why continue to screw over the loyal Commodore Amiga base with vague, non-descript, non-committal answers? You would think it's specifically just for their amusement at this point since they obviously want nothing to do with the community.
Except take whatever cash they can get.
The only thing I find more surprising than the fact they released hardware with no software, is the fact that people actually bought it. In many ways, people in the Amiga community are begging to be misled. Nobody with sense buys hardware before a [reasonably verifyable] release date is set for the software.
Actually, that's not quite true. What I really find more surprising than the hardware, is that some people say they bought an AmigaOne to support the Amiga. It is Amiga's responsibility to support themselves until they release a complete product, not a mere piece.
SHADES: Being In House could mean ANYTHING.
Yes, but how many "in-house" products have Amiga Inc. released in the last six years? A cheezy game pack? That doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
Also, I'm still confused about what is meant by in-house. Here's something from the IRC chat (quoted by Elwood):
smithy:
what is the future of what we today call the AmigaOS technology? It only has a minor role on the new amiga inc website. Will there be an OS4.1, 4.2,.. etc? Will there be an OS5 based on the current amigaOS codebase (and not amigade/amigaanywhere)?
GarryH:
I think I answered this. We are interested in operating systems. We moved future product developemnt in-house last August. We do not publicly speculate on product development.
Given that the question was about future development of AmigaOS, this does seem to imply that "operating systems", and not AA, has been moved in-house, since their Tao-based platform always has been in-house.
However, in that follow-up interview, this was posted:
2. Does Hyperion (I refer to AmigaOne Partners) have the right to extend OS 4.0 to say 4.1?
Yes they do. In fact, for you conspiracy theorists, that is the wrong question. Disclosing details of exactly what this means is confidential. Bottom line - they do have that right and I hope this comment doesn't violate our NDA.
Excuse me? Future versions of operating systems will be done in-house, but Hyperion will still do the work and they call the shots about what will and won't be done? Does that mean Hyperion is considered in-house, or does it mean Amiga is planing to do their own OS (5.x) that isn't based on OS4?
If all of this is my mis-interpretation, what, exactly, did Garry mean with that comment that future development has been moved in-house? Future development of what?
I didn't think these interviews were any help at all, especially since most questions ended up with (to paraphrase), "our partners are doing their work, we're doing ours, and we have NDAs over everything."
WTF? :-?
SHADES: To be quite blunt, he shouldn't have to, and I bet that Hyperion won't tell you either.
Yes, they both
should -- if they expect people to acutally buy their products.
A company is nothing without its reputation.