0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
There is Minimig, and author accepts these as valid entries, no matter what is your opinion of these boards.Call it sacrilege, but it will be done. Even PPC Macs if MOS users demand so :-)
Wiki does sohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga_models_and_variants#PowerPC-based_Amiga_models_.28post_Commodore.29AMIGA is also machine running AmigaOS, not just chipset based computer with 68k named AMIGA.
funny so all the classics running PPC boards to use AmigaOS are no longer Amigas:angry:
yap, I certainly agree... but as per usual most suspects favour in-fighting and bring everything down with them... sigh...Tom UK
As well as AmigaOne is board series made to run AmigaOS as sucessor, being extension of Amiga on PPC arhitecture.
I see absolutely no harm in having pages for "Amiga NG Systems" or "Amiga like systems". They have pertinence and interest amongst the Amiga community. Don't let narrow vision and crippling definitions of what one perceives as an "Amiga" keep helpful info off a site like BBOAH.I can fire up my MOS machine or my SAM and run a classic Amiga program just fine, no emulation required. I know neither machine has a C= logo on the case, I know they aren't Amiga's. But are they of interest and in relation to the Amiga lineage?I believe so. If having a SAM or MOS box on BBOAH is something that will keep you up nights, I truly worry about y'all, lol.
I believe iMica and AresOne deserve the entries, just don`t have the hardware to do high res pictures and entries.Hardware architecture can and should change.
No it doesn`t.
Thanks, didn`t know there is AROS for AndroidYou are welcome to send an entry if you desire so. However, if I am correct, these are running AROS as VM, not natively, but nevermind.
Who is the ultimate judge on what constitutes "pollution"? Who sets the bar as to purity? Sort of subjective upon whoever is looking at things, no?I've got very little interest in legacy Amiga stuff these days. If someone was to post legacy machine info on a NG Amiga site I visit, would I be offended and call it "pollution"? No. I likely wouldn't read it if it held none of my interest and leave it at that. Such a case would be loosely related to what I am interested in, but really offer me nothing, so I simply would skip over it just like I do the sports page in the morning newspaper. Not my cup of tea, but certainly not "pollution" if someone gets value out of it even if I do not.I know that sports section is there everyday in my newspaper, and that someone surely enjoys it even if I do not, and that's it's ultimately my choice to disregard it. I don't lose sleep over that sports section, you know?Whatever happened to people having the personal free will to just read what is interesting to them and ignore what they do not like, or what they are not interested in.
I agree with others. Lets not pollute BBOAH with NG Amiga stuff. If it can execute 68k code natively then it should be added. That is where I would draw the line.NG stuff running AROS/OS4/MorphOS could have a dedicated site instead.
I admitted it myself on my own beliefs and nothing more. Ones definition of an Amiga may only be towards C= hardware and not AT or Escom.That being said, the "Amiga" right beside me clearly says "Amiga OS" on the titlebar at the top of the Workbench screen. It'll run pretty much any classic, legacy software I try on it. In that sense it is an Amiga, no?
@ Nik,Troll! :smack:
+1the whole action is nothing but another desperate attempt to crap all over the genuine amiga fans sandbox to spoil their game if they dont convert. and this just by individual actionists of some other system. im sorta tired of being haunted by freaks like that. as usual morphos users show more reason, integrity and respect to amiga legacy.
