Because, as it's name clearly states, The Big Book of Amiga Hardware is a site dedicated solely to documenting Amiga hardware and nothing else.
You have already admitted yourself that OS4 and MorphOS machines are not Amigas, therefore they do not belong on that site. Simple as that.
SUrely, Nyx and Boxer fully fall on that category.
How narrow minded people are.
On industry standards vs Commodore standards and 68k natively
And so do these boards run Amiga PPC/MorphOS PPC programs NATIVELY.
Walker was first to feature ISA and PCI bus as Zorro replacement as standard (promoted by Mediator) so moving from CBM standards was clear and real, as much as Apple moved from Apple specific standards to industry standards.
It features Nyx which is neither as well as Boxer that also has ISA/PCI and PowerPC.
ISA slots were even present on early Amiga 2000 and Amiga 3000, but usable only via
IBM PC emulation cards.
Amiga stanards were innovative up to Amiga 3000.
Why leaving NG hardware out of picture, especially that BBOAH features nice things like scanned commercials and manuals for the boards/systems?
On companies:
I do remember companies from that time, but things evolve.
All those companies left the market, and we were left with mentioned companies
(Eyetech, Genesi, Acube,A-EON)
They have designed hardware specifically for Amiga market that has no other uses
(can run Linux thanks to Linux versatility)
There is no such definition of BBOAH, and obviously no censorship of such kind, beside YOUR interpretation what belongs there.
Once again,
website owner accepted to include mentioned boards as long as someone else makes the articles. Needed are people that have such hardware, time, nice camera and that can scan manuals and so on, not people claiming its heresy.
NG stuff running AROS/OS4/MorphOS could have a dedicated site instead.
New website would just make a duplicate, for what, just few boards that are part of Amiga history and recognized as PPC continuation on both Amiga Wiki pages and Amiga History models page.
Who would host such as OS4/MOS communities are divided,
and why not using existing resources? Because of peoples "Classic idolism"? Linkage to Amiga name?
Half Amiga models presented there bear no Amiga name.
Its not an "Alien infiltration" its showing what we use today, who developed it and that was progress after 1997.
Not preserving our own history, just makes it look like everything ended with CBM. Even those were glory days
there is more to it. Some people decide to stick to Classic only seeing it as "clone OSs" on "clone hardware"
but they fail to see custom home computers ended with Atari and CBM simply because its too expnsive
and non competitive. And yet the same people use same AHI and RTG to utilize cards with additional power,
difference only happened in moving to PowerPC - that included Motorola and is de facto next generation replacement of 68k.
What a bunch of hypocrisy.
