Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?  (Read 6980 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline odin

  • Colonization had Galleons
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 6796
    • Show only replies by odin
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #14 from previous page: July 03, 2004, 02:13:24 AM »
Great...now my head hurts. I knew this thread would result in that....(or could it be the beer?...).

Offline gizz72

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 817
    • Show only replies by gizz72
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #15 on: July 03, 2004, 02:38:47 AM »
@Odin

Think of it as the beer bubbles expanding in the tummy. The further it expands the more ones head ache. :lol:

@blob

If the universe keeps on expanding. Detecting life ouuut ther will also be  more remote.
In the end, the earth will be alone! Even if we detected life in, for example, Alpha Centari, by X years from now AC won't be around anymore cause it's furhter away now than X years ago? That's sad... :-(

Cheers,

Gizz
Good day to all Amigans!
Please Check My FaceBook page
or my Resource Blog @ G.A.R.P.

SAM - SAMSUNG DB-Z2 Dual Core; 1 GB RAM; Dual Drive Win7 and IcarosDesktopv1.5.2
GEORGE - TOSHIBA Satellite J41 ; 512MB RAM; Dual Partition WinXP and IcarosDesktopv1.5.2
MANNY - A1200 + CobraDKB \'030 w/ 32MB + DataF
 

Offline T_Bone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5124
    • Show only replies by T_Bone
    • http://www.amiga.org/userinfo.php?uid=1961
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #16 on: July 03, 2004, 06:58:09 AM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
Quote
T_Bone wrote:
If this is the case, I wonder what happens when universes start expanding into each other?


By definition, they can't. A universe is a universe; once a big bang happens there's no longer the conditions within that universe for it ever to happen again.

Besides which, the laws of physics are finely tuned and we would be able to detect the presence of other big bangs in our universe even if possible by mathematical analysis of fundamental properties.


...such as?  :-)

We don't even know why the properties exist, how can we use them as tea leaves?
this space for rent
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #17 on: July 03, 2004, 04:40:53 PM »
Such as: the velocity of light. This is proportional to the energy 'stored' in the vacuum of the universe in the form of transient energy. If energy was to condense again from the vacuum catastrophically enough to cause another big bang, the main result would be a drop in the speed of light. (Which would probably destroy physics as we know it, and certainly make all current life processes stop).

At all other times, the speed of light and the energy contained in the vacuum form an equilibrium which prevent the universe 'exploding' into expansion the way it did just after the big bang.

Every particle in the universe effects every other. You couldn't not notice if there was another big bang outside our sphere of possible observation, even if it was possible for there to be another one (and it ain't).
 

Offline Dandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 1221
    • Show only replies by Dandy
    • http://www.wiehltalbahn.de/en/
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2004, 01:49:16 PM »
Quote

PMC wrote:
@Blob,

Please excuse my ignorance on this!

But how could the initial rate of expansion of our infant universe be faster than the speed of light, when the physical properties of the universe itself prevent anything travelling beyond that speed?
...

What makes you so sure that the physical properties of the universe itself prevent anything travelling beyond the speed of light?

Especially by the given background, that just last week it was in the news, that scientists succeeded in "beaming" (dematerialisation, transport, rematerialisation) single atoms over a short distance.

But aside from that I was always wondering if it really should be impossible to exceed light speed.

All I know about black holes implies that exceeding light speed must be physically possible:
If the gravitation of an black hole is really that big that even its own light can't escape from it, then it seems logical to me, that, if you're caught by the gravitation of this black hole, you will be accelerated in the direction of the centre of this gravity.

As this gravity is that strong, that even light can't escape from it, it is logical that you will be accelerated so much , that you exceed light speed before reaching the surface of this black "hole".

In my point of view (if I understood everything right) exceeding the lightspeed means that you leave the 4-dimensional space-time continuum and enter the next (fifth?) dimension.
All the best,

Dandy

Website maintained by me

If someone enjoys marching to military music, then I already despise him. He got his brain accidently - the bone marrow in his back would have been sufficient for him! (Albert Einstein)
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show only replies by Cymric
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2004, 02:54:43 PM »
Quote
Dandy wrote:
What makes you so sure that the physical properties of the universe itself prevent anything travelling beyond the speed of light? Especially by the given background, that just last week it was in the news, that scientists succeeded in "beaming" (dematerialisation, transport, rematerialisation) single atoms over a short distance. But aside from that I was always wondering if it really should be impossible to exceed light speed.

Yes, it is. For anything material, and on average, that is; it is quite easy to demonstrate that shadows can easily move faster than light. Other people have slowed light to a near standstill, and then used quite clever tricks to temporarily transmit information across the 'slow light zone' faster than the reigning speed of light in that medium.

There is a way for matter to go faster than light on average, but it involves a cheat: think of the Cerenkov-effect, better known as the blue glow surrounding any bassin-based nuclear fission reactor. Electrons moving faster than the speed of light in water cause a shockwave very similar to an airplane exceeding the speed of sound. The excess energy is radiated away in the form of the blue glow. This also means that if tachyons (hypothetical faster-than-light particles) were real, and they move through space, they would produce (very visible) Cerenkov-like shockwaves, slowing down and down and down until their speed was infinitesimally higher than c.

Quote
All I know about black holes implies that exceeding light speed must be physically possible: If the gravitation of an black hole is really that big that even its own light can't escape from it, then it seems logical to me, that, if you're caught by the gravitation of this black hole, you will be accelerated in the direction of the centre of this gravity. As this gravity is that strong, that even light can't escape from it, it is logical that you will be accelerated so much , that you exceed light speed before reaching the surface of this black "hole".

Black holes are tricky buggers. For one thing, you shouldn't think of them in terms of ordinary objects, as this is the surest way of tying your brain in knots. Black holes do not attract light, they mearly bend space to such an enormous extent that what we think of as the normal straight travel path of a photon curves inward on itself, and becomes a circle. It still moves at c, but since its travel path is no longer pointing at us, we never see it either. The point where the curvature becomes (mathematically) infinite is known as the event horizon, and nothing bigger than an atom (and probably not even something this big) will ever get there. The rest is torn to pieces by huge gravitational tidal forces. I recall that for an outsider's point of view, it would even take an infinite time for that atom to actually reach the horizon.

There's tons more to be said about black holes (you can measure their density, which, believe it or not, becomes less the more massive they are, to the point where they'd float in water or even air), but suffice to say that you will never exceed c anywhere during this final and very lethal trip of going to a black hole.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2004, 04:01:03 PM »
Quote
Dandy wrote:
What makes you so sure that the physical properties of the universe itself prevent anything travelling beyond the speed of light?


Because it would break all known physical and mathematical laws to do so.

Quote
Especially by the given background, that just last week it was in the news, that scientists succeeded in "beaming" (dematerialisation, transport, rematerialisation) single atoms over a short distance.


No, they did not. They teleported the properties of atoms over a short distance, or teleported single photons. There is no point where a whole atom was ever 'teleported'.

Quote
If the gravitation of an black hole is really that big that even its own light can't escape from it, then it seems logical to me, that, if you're caught by the gravitation of this black hole, you will be accelerated in the direction of the centre of this gravity.

As this gravity is that strong, that even light can't escape from it, it is logical that you will be accelerated so much , that you exceed light speed before reaching the surface of this black "hole".


No, that's not right. Firstly, light speed is constant and can't be accelerated or decelerated - not by gravity, not by anything. It can't escape a black hole simply because there is a point where the incident light beam is curved towards the singularity so much, instead of getting back out it just spirals inwards and is gone. Never once during this process does it change speed.

And to accelerate mass to light speed would require all of the energy in the universe - including the energy contained in the mass you're trying to accelerate. As you can see this is quite impossible. Not even a black hole can ever do this.

Quote
In my point of view (if I understood everything right) exceeding the lightspeed means that you leave the 4-dimensional space-time continuum and enter the next (fifth?) dimension.


Actually you're already present in 11 dimensions according to String Theory. Many of these hidden ('compactified') dimensions are closer to you than your clothes.
 

Offline Cymric

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 1031
    • Show only replies by Cymric
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2004, 04:23:32 PM »
Quote
KennyR wrote:
Because it would break all known physical and mathematical laws to do so.

I'm sure you know that this reason in itself is not a valid one, but I cannot resist adding a little clarification for those who might not know: laws of nature are not written in stone. They are short and concise summaries of many, many observed facts, often shortened even further by borrowing the symbolism of mathematics. They are foremost human constructs. Contrary to popular belief, things are allowed (sometimes even encouraged) to break physical laws, but the person reporting such a violation had better be very sure about what he is reporting, and back up his claim with solid evidence. Needless to say, experiments which hold out under intense scrutiny almost invariably yield Nobel prizes.

Okay, enough lecturing from me, onwards with the black hole discussion.
Some people say that cats are sneaky, evil and cruel. True, and they have many other fine qualities as well.
 

Offline KennyR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 8081
    • Show only replies by KennyR
    • http://wrongpla.net
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2004, 04:46:06 PM »
Quote
Cymric wrote:
I'm sure you know that this reason in itself is not a valid one, but I cannot resist adding a little clarification for those who might not know: laws of nature are not written in stone.


I disagree. They're absolute and changeless, the maths from which the fractal pattern of the universe is drawn. Only humanity's understanding of them can possibly be 'broken'.
 

Offline PMC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 2616
    • Show only replies by PMC
    • http://www.b3ta.com
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2004, 11:13:27 AM »
Quote

blobrana wrote:
Hum,
i think he's aware that
Speed = distance/time
 and  acceleration = ( final speed - initial speed ) / time



Blob kindly explained this to me in layman's terms - if I haven't thanked you already for your explaination, then thanks for your help Blob!

Beyond the expanding boundaries of our universe, there is no "time" and therefore no speed...  At least that's my interpretation of it!  

I have no understanding of Physics beyond GCSE level, but it doesn't stop me from being very keenly interested.
Cecilia for President
 

Offline T_Bone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5124
    • Show only replies by T_Bone
    • http://www.amiga.org/userinfo.php?uid=1961
Re: Ok, the universe. Infinite in size or what?
« Reply #24 on: July 09, 2004, 05:24:43 PM »
Quote

KennyR wrote:
Quote
Cymric wrote:
I'm sure you know that this reason in itself is not a valid one, but I cannot resist adding a little clarification for those who might not know: laws of nature are not written in stone.


I disagree. They're absolute and changeless, the maths from which the fractal pattern of the universe is drawn. Only humanity's understanding of them can possibly be 'broken'.


Maybe it already is ;-)

Actually I was just recently thinking about something you said a while ago, that anything that's even the slightest bit possible will happen eventually, as an infintesmal times infinity is one.

As I was thinking about this, I extrapolated this to every imaginable story I've ever heard, The Wizard of Oz, Willie Wonka's chocolate factory, etc and came to the conclusion that although the chances that these stories will actually happen verbatim is really really slim, they HAVE to happen eventually. Everything you can imagine has to happen eventually. A universe with two bangs (or one happening in two places) HAS to happen eventually. If you can concieve it in your mind it has to happen.

Heinlein touched upon this in "The number of the beast"
this space for rent