Technically, the last Amigas died with Commodore. Really.
Definately. Funny how people are still arguing over whether the AmigaOne or the Pegasos is the most "Amiga", when the AmigaOne and OS4 haven't even been released, yet!
but is it just a name tag if it is infact an evolution of the original OS code?
Design principles and UI design are what define an OS, at least as far as the user is concerned. As far as architecture is concerned, OS4 is supposed to be largely updated, if not fully rewritten.
I don't care if it's Amiga or not. I just want it to work the way a computer should. That seems unlikely, though. OS4 doesn't even support user accounts. It makes me wonder just how the heck they intend to improve on system security, the biggest problem with Windows.
Amiga OS 4.0 is more Amiga than Apple's OSX is Mac System OS.
Well said. I used to be a Mac sysadmin, so all I can say about classic MacOS is "good ridance!"
Why fixate on legacy if it means sacrificing progress?
That assumes that all change is progress. Take a look at Windows and how much it's progressed over the years.
Apple had a history of stagnation before Steve took over again. It never ceases to amaze me that while Microsoft came out with the Start Menu, a huge improvement on the Mac equivalent, Apple just sat on their butts and let their system age. The only thing more pathetic than the fact MacOS 8 still didn't have an Apple menu that supported drag-and-drop, is the fact that MacOS 9 didn't, either.
Of course, that's because the Mac was SO GOOD, it didn't NEED to improve. Sounds just like Commodore, really. That probably explains why they nearly went bankrupt before they "bought" NeXT.
Now if only the Linux folks would pick up on that. I'm tired of having to do everything with command prompts in an age where 3D graphics at 1280x1024 at 100 FPS is the big thing. MacOS X is my vision of a "proper" version of Linux.