Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: C128 vs Apple IIc+  (Read 7085 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Varthall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 633
    • Show only replies by Varthall
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #14 on: April 21, 2004, 12:58:37 PM »
Quote

McNorris wrote:
Oh yeah, one more consideration...

How to get disk images or files from a modern computer to a C128D?

I made a cable for my 1571 drive to attach it to my old Amiga. I read and write files with Easy1541.

Varthall
AmigaOne XE - AmigaOS 4.1 - Freescale 7457 1GHz - 1GB ram
MPlayer for OS4: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mplayer-amigaos/
 

Offline Varthall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 633
    • Show only replies by Varthall
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2004, 01:00:37 PM »
Quote

angrybrit wrote:
I saw screenshots of Doom on the Intellivision too.  So there might be a chance it could be done. :-)


Are you referring to the screenshots of a Doom clone for the Atari VCS2600? They were fake.

Varthall
AmigaOne XE - AmigaOS 4.1 - Freescale 7457 1GHz - 1GB ram
MPlayer for OS4: https://sourceforge.net/projects/mplayer-amigaos/
 

Offline redrumloa

  • Original Omega User
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 10126
    • Show only replies by redrumloa
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2004, 01:03:52 PM »
Quote
How many games actually were written for native C128 mode?


Commercial games? Probably about 10 that I've heard of.

Quote
Anything to take advantage of that 2 Mhz?


AFAIK only Infocom text games.
Someone has to state the obvious and that someone is me!
 

Offline redrumloa

  • Original Omega User
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 10126
    • Show only replies by redrumloa
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2004, 01:11:34 PM »
Well there is MOOD for the C64.


A round from the rocket launcher hits the wall and explodes on impact.
Someone has to state the obvious and that someone is me!
 

Offline TheMagicM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2857
    • Show only replies by TheMagicM
    • http://www.BartonekDragRacing.com
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2004, 01:45:29 PM »
I agree w/redrumola... 128D > Apple II/IIe/c/*
PowerMac G5 dual 2.0ghz/128meg Radeon/500gb HD/2GB RAM, MorphOS 3.9 registered, user #1900
Powerbook G4 5,6 1.67ghz/2gb RAM, Radeon 9700/250gb hd, MorphOS 3.9 registered #3143
 

Offline xeron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 2533
    • Show only replies by xeron
    • http://www.petergordon.org.uk
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2004, 02:19:30 PM »
@TheMagicM

Speaking as a Commodore fan, I still think you should check out the Apple ][ GS before including that "*" wildcard :) Sure the "classic" Apple ][ had crappy graphics compared to the C64, but the GS is something special :)

I'd say Apple ][ GS > 128D > Apple ][/e/c. Although the 128D has a shedload more software ;)

Some Apple ][ GS demos: (a good emulator for windows is KEGS)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11790
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11796
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11792
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11788
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11793
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11881
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=11789
Playstation Network ID: xeron6
 

Offline TheMagicM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 2857
    • Show only replies by TheMagicM
    • http://www.BartonekDragRacing.com
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2004, 03:01:45 PM »
xeron:
no, I meant > all the IIe/c/+ versions...

I remember in jr. high the c64 vs. Apple IIe/c wars... hehehe

btw, thanks for the links.. I've *never* used a GS, but those gfx look awesome!  What are the specs on the GS ?
PowerMac G5 dual 2.0ghz/128meg Radeon/500gb HD/2GB RAM, MorphOS 3.9 registered, user #1900
Powerbook G4 5,6 1.67ghz/2gb RAM, Radeon 9700/250gb hd, MorphOS 3.9 registered #3143
 

Offline McTrinsic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 216
    • Show only replies by McTrinsic
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #21 on: April 21, 2004, 03:38:04 PM »
The GS rather compares to the Amiga.

It was a freaky weirdo, some inbetween machine when Apple didnt want to let go fo the II series and on the other side wanted to go ahead.

The Apple II has the problem of sound... does anyone actually own a mockingboard??

And, some bizarre shifts in the display. You get some pink around sprites and moving objects. When I used an emulator recently I suddenly remembered that crappy display.

The emulator programmer said "its not a bug, its a feature" lol

I must admit, the C128D was born dead as well as the GS though. CBM wanted to make a better machine but were trapped with the success of the C64 and didnt want to let get of that userbase. They wanted to offer a "natural" upgrade.

Have fun,
McTrinsic
 

Offline jutrem

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 67
    • Show only replies by jutrem
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2004, 03:48:21 PM »
 The 128D was a nice machine, I had one. I did some programming in 128 mode which was a lot better than the c64 mode. There should have been more 128 support software. Developers could have released games and apps that would use 128 features if detected. It was like the amiga scene in the early 90's, having a 3000 or 4000 but having to run (a500) software that didn't take use the extra cpu and graphic power.  

 The 128D was even better than the original 128. The separate keyboard and desktop case made it more comfortable to use.
 

Offline drHirudo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 539
    • Show only replies by drHirudo
    • http://hirudov.com
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2004, 04:11:26 PM »
The AppleIIGS is an unique machine, because it have backwards compatibility with the 8 bits Apples, thanks to the 65816 CPU, and it's still 16 bit and there was no split between the dudes with the 8 bit toys and the 16 bit "monsters" at the time. I can't imagine what it could have been if the Amiga was designed to be compatible with the C64 at first place.

Offline -BobW-

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 109
    • Show only replies by -BobW-
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2004, 04:13:36 PM »
I just pulled mu C128 out of storage this weekend and was delighted to see that all my old disks seem to still work.

It was amusing to see my son get impatient waiting for the games to load.  He was convinced that it couldn't possibly take that long for a game to load.  :lol:
Amiga 500 GVP A530 Accel + SCSI2SD + 8 MB RAM and OS 2.04
Amiga 1200 GVP \\\'030 Accel + 32 MB RAM and OS 3.9 BB3
Amiga 4000 Cybervision 64/3D Mk-II + Warp Engine 4040 128 MB RAM and OS 3.9 BB3
Micro A1 866 Mhz and AmigaOS 4.1
PowerMac G4 1.4 Ghz and MorphOS 3.9
Mac Mini G4 1.5 Ghz and MorphOS 3.9
 

Offline Madgun68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 706
    • Show only replies by Madgun68
    • http://home.comcast.net/~madgun1968
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2004, 07:37:51 PM »
I don't know if anyone else followed the links from Xeron's post, but if you're interested in seeing what the GS can do and are using a browser capable of ActiveX, check out FTA. They've got an ActiveX GS emulator with some demos and games to check out. Pretty impressive stuff imo.
......
 

Offline justthatgood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 579
  • Country: us
    • Show only replies by justthatgood
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2004, 09:44:32 PM »
@Madgun68

Ha ha, I still have my Apple IIgs too. Though I had to replace the original keyboard with one of the Macintosh ones, it was really freaky that it could use so much of the ADB stuff.

It's sitting on the shelves opposite of my 3 Amigas
[color=008000]Pluto[/color]:Amiga4KD- 64040/16megs/1GB WD/PAR 2150/1942/WB3.0,3.1,3.9
[color=800080]Amanda[/color]:Amiga2KHD/A2620/8MegSupraRam2k/A2091/VLab
 

Offline angrybrit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 127
    • Show only replies by angrybrit
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2004, 10:34:12 PM »
Quote

Varthall wrote:

Are you referring to the screenshots of a Doom clone for the Atari VCS2600? They were fake.

Varthall

I was referring to this: http://spatula-city.org/~im14u2c/intv/doom/
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2004, 11:01:39 PM »
And did you look at the bottom of the page?

The part where it reads

Quote

Note: This was an April Fool's Joke.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last update: Apr 1, 2002.


int p; // A
 

Offline iamaboringperson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show only replies by iamaboringperson
Re: C128 vs Apple IIc+
« Reply #29 from previous page: April 22, 2004, 06:32:35 AM »
Quote

McNorris wrote:
What do you think?

I still mess w/ my IIc+, but a dude might want to trade a C128D for it.

What do you think had better graphics (sound is a given)?
I own a IIc, and I would probably perfer a C128.

The graphics are better, the sound is better, the C128 has a 6502(or 6510) AND Z-80.

Better keyboard, better software...

It's really better all round.