Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A500+ vs. A600  (Read 6953 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MotormouthTopic starter

A500+ vs. A600
« on: September 07, 2015, 04:33:16 AM »
Which is better???

ECS vs ECS
upto 2 meg chip in both

Zorro I vs A600 trapdoor expansions

scsi options? vs ide on board

number pad vs small keyboard

opinions???
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2015, 05:00:06 AM »
Quote from: Motormouth;795138
Which is better???

ECS vs ECS
upto 2 meg chip in both

Zorro I vs A600 trapdoor expansions

scsi options? vs ide on board

number pad vs small keyboard

opinions???

I believe the Warren Commission was too quick in overlooking the grassy knoll!
 

Offline Jiffy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 474
    • Show only replies by Jiffy
    • http://clausewitz.nl
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2015, 07:26:59 AM »
Neither is better. They both had their merits back then (with the A500+ slightly more expandable back then), they both have their merits right now (with the A600 being slightly more expandable right now).

They are quite alike and 'suffered' from the same incompatabilities when it came to software.
Life sucks. Then you die. Then they throw mud in your face. Then you get eaten by worms. Be happy it happens in that order... My Amiga 1200
 

Offline ElPolloDiabl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 1702
    • Show only replies by ElPolloDiabl
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2015, 07:31:20 AM »
I prefer the A600, but I haven't played enough games to know if the lack of numeric pad becomes annoying. You can upgrade them to be almost identical.
Go Go Gadget Signature!
 

Offline Robbie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 245
    • Show only replies by Robbie
    • http://uponthevoid.com
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2015, 07:41:17 AM »
I would argue that the A500+ is probably still easier to expand, what with the ACA500 now available and the motherboard having socketed chips rather than surface mounting. I haven't owned either but i've heard of people having a lot of problems with boards overheating in the A600 or just coming loose intermittently.
 

Offline AmmoJammo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 726
    • Show only replies by AmmoJammo
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2015, 07:56:01 AM »
I have an expanded A500, and an expanded A600...

The A600 takes up about 1/5th the desk space as the A500, that alone give the A600 the win ;)

Of course, they are expanded in different ways, so the A500 could be made smaller, but its always going to be twice the size of the A600.
 

Offline MotormouthTopic starter

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2015, 03:17:58 PM »
Quote from: AmmoJammo;795148
I have an expanded A500, and an expanded A600...

The A600 takes up about 1/5th the desk space as the A500, that alone give the A600 the win ;)

Of course, they are expanded in different ways, so the A500 could be made smaller, but its always going to be twice the size of the A600.


Back in the day I had an A500 (rev 6A) with a GVP A500 HD and a slingshot pro with an A2065, the thing was really long..............  Plus you needed extra room on the right side for floppy access.   It was difficult finding a "small" desk to hold it.

Even the A2000 was small (in length) compared to this beast.


Quote from: Jiffy;795144
Neither is better. They both had their merits back then (with the A500+ slightly more expandable back then), they both have their merits right now (with the A600 being slightly more expandable right now).

They are quite alike and 'suffered' from the same incompatabilities when it came to software.


With either of these 3.1 should probably be the goal for configuration and not attempting to run older 1.3 games.
 

Offline MotormouthTopic starter

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2015, 03:20:41 PM »
Quote from: Robbie;795146
I would argue that the A500+ is probably still easier to expand, what with the ACA500 now available and the motherboard having socketed chips rather than surface mounting. I haven't owned either but i've heard of people having a lot of problems with boards overheating in the A600 or just coming loose intermittently.


It looks like the ACA500 out of stock at AmigaKit,  Is Jens going to be making more of these?
 

Offline psxphill

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2015, 04:25:39 PM »
Quote from: Motormouth;795138
Zorro I vs A600 trapdoor expansions

A500+ is better. The a600 trapdoor is essentially ram+rtc only, the same as the trapdoor in the A500. It's only the A1200 trapdoor that is equivalent to the expansion port on the A500+.

However the A500+ does not support Zorro I, those are used by the Ranger add on (and also the third party versions that were actually released) for the A1000 and are just a different shape to Zorro II cards.

Officially the slot on the side of the A500+ is called the "86-Pin Slot Expansion" and it's roughly compatible to the A2000 CPU slot, some accelerators were compatible with both. http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/supra28 The A2000 board is shaped like that because it's the same one used in the A500 version, it's just in a box and has a pass thru. AFAIK you can use the A500 version in an A2000 as well.

Personally a 1.3 A500 and a 3.1 A1200 is the way to go.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2015, 04:34:48 PM by psxphill »
 

Offline paul1981

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2015, 04:28:54 PM »
The A600 has crappy smd capacitors which are leaking and wrecking boards as we speak.
The A500 is more desirable in that aspect (providing the barrel battery has been removed before motherboard damage).

You can't have a DMA connected hard disk on the A600. So another feather in the A500's cap.

I read somewhere though that you can't have graffiti emulation for Doom on the A500 with the IndivisionECS. Maybe I'm wrong... Can anyone clear this up?

Size, well if size doesn't matter then it makes no odds. I prefer the A600 size wise. If you want an 80's feel, then go for the A500.
 

Offline paul1981

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2015, 04:31:57 PM »
Quote from: psxphill;795178
A500+ is better. The a600 trapdoor is essentially ram+rtc only, the same as the trapdoor in the A500. It's only the A1200 trapdoor that is equivalent to the expansion port on the A500+.

However the A500+ does not support Zorro I, those are used by the Ranger add on (and also the third party versions that were actually released) for the A1000 and are just a different shape to Zorro II cards.

Officially the slot on the side of the A500+ is called the "86-Pin Slot Expansion" and it's roughly compatible to the A2000 CPU slot, some accelerators were compatible with both. http://amiga.resource.cx/exp/supra28


There was a PC emulator card for the A600's trapdoor, but it is very rare. The IndivisionECS can be mounted in here too on top of one of Jen's chip ram expansions (A603, A604).
 

Offline MotormouthTopic starter

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2015, 06:02:41 PM »
Quote from: paul1981;795180
There was a PC emulator card for the A600's trapdoor, but it is very rare. The IndivisionECS can be mounted in here too on top of one of Jen's chip ram expansions (A603, A604).


Was there not also a PC emulator card for the A500's trapdoor?
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2015, 06:14:58 PM »
Both are 2nd class choice for gaming and 2nd class choice for productivity work (whatever this would be in 2015).

IDE (PATA) drives used to be cheaper and easier to find but now it is obsolete technology just like SCSI.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline AndyFC

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 578
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 28 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by AndyFC
Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2015, 08:19:34 PM »
My mate had an A500+ at the same time as me and his was faulty (random crashes on s/w which worked for me) and when it came to an exchange, he got the A600 instead.

At the time he wished he'd tried to get an A500+ again as the lack of numeric keypad caused him issues with DPaint 3 and some games (a flight sim especially).
Volunteer Moderator.

A1200 in DIY Tower. 3.2 ROMs (softkicking 3.2.3), OS 3.2.3, CF card, CD RW and IDE to SD adapter running off the internal IDE port (using the A4000 4-port IDE adapter from Amigakit), Pistorm 32 lite with Pi4/2GB/Emu68 or Blizzard 1230-IV, with 32MB 60ns RAM and 50MHz 68882 FPU.
MorphOS on PowerMac G5 and ATI 9600 pro
 

Offline vince_6

Re: A500+ vs. A600
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2015, 08:37:14 PM »
I have both.
A500+ 2MB chip, 2MB fast (below 68k) and 2MB fast ACA500
A600 ACA620.

A500 is better for me, A600 is too hot and hard to repair.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2015, 10:48:54 PM by vince_6 »
My BBS : flashbackbbs.sytes.net:6502
http://partsfromthepast.blogspot.gr/ A1200 Black Project