Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark  (Read 17431 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #104 from previous page: March 01, 2014, 08:03:14 PM »
Quote from: SysAdmin;759967
I'm guessing they sold less than 100 c64x's during the products life cycle.


You have guessed wrong.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline SysAdmin

  • News posting Auto Agent
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1393
    • Show only replies by SysAdmin
    • http://www.a-eon.com
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #105 on: March 01, 2014, 08:17:13 PM »
Quote from: dammy;759969
You have guessed wrong.


We'll they didn't sell enough to keep a viable business going.
Posts on this account before August 4th, 2012 don\'t belong to me.
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #106 on: March 01, 2014, 08:37:46 PM »
Quote from: SysAdmin;759970
We'll they didn't sell enough to keep a viable business going.


C=USA closed because of Barry's death and the family did not want to continue it.  Had Barry survived his cancer, you would be shocked to see what Barry had arranged after a specific law suit was finished (final judgement was Dec of 2013).
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show only replies by persia
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #107 on: March 01, 2014, 08:49:43 PM »
So tell us.  Barry's dead, the company liquidated, it does no harm to anyone to disclose what plans Barry had.

Quote from: dammy;759972
C=USA closed because of Barry's death and the family did not want to continue it.  Had Barry survived his cancer, you would be shocked to see what Barry had arranged after a specific law suit was finished (final judgement was Dec of 2013).
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #108 on: March 01, 2014, 09:21:04 PM »
Quote from: persia;759974
So tell us.  Barry's dead, the company liquidated, it does no harm to anyone to disclose what plans Barry had.


I was going to release stuff this past December, but someone else (who also knew Barry) might be attempting something so I'm going to hold my tongue on this subject awhile longer.  I don't think I should rock any boats right now.
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline number6

Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #109 on: March 01, 2014, 09:58:44 PM »
Quote from: dammy;759896
I just checked State of Florida records and it was:

Last Event             ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT
Event Date Filed    09/27/2013



You may have left off an important bit from that source.

Quote
Event Effective Date:NONE


If you're curious about what Admin Dissolution concerns from the standpoint of the State of Florida:

http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/617.1421

#6
 

Offline RobertJDohnert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 17
    • Show only replies by RobertJDohnert
    • http://www.os4online.com
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #110 on: March 01, 2014, 10:21:15 PM »
Quote from: Minuous;759808
That is obviously completely wrong, as Amiga was a registered trademark of Commodore-Amiga, etc. for many years.


Actually, it was Commodore Amiga, two words that met the criteria.  Commodore Amiga is not generic, Amiga is.
 

Offline haywirepc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1331
    • Show only replies by haywirepc
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #111 on: March 01, 2014, 11:02:41 PM »
oh boy dammy, new commodore amiga grave robbers making plans.

Get the popcorn.
 

Offline SysAdmin

  • News posting Auto Agent
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1393
    • Show only replies by SysAdmin
    • http://www.a-eon.com
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #112 on: March 02, 2014, 01:14:15 AM »
Quote from: dammy;759975
I was going to release stuff this past December, but someone else (who also knew Barry) might be attempting something so I'm going to hold my tongue on this subject awhile longer.  I don't think I should rock any boats right now.


CommodoreUSA plans are always super secret it seems. A viable business would have survived Barry's death. Steve Jobs died and Apple didn't miss a beat. Barry's family didn't continue because there was no sales to justify doing so.
Posts on this account before August 4th, 2012 don\'t belong to me.
 

Offline number6

Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #113 on: March 02, 2014, 01:32:28 AM »
Quote from: SysAdmin;759990
CommodoreUSA plans are always super secret it seems. A viable business would have survived Barry's death. Steve Jobs died and Apple didn't miss a beat. Barry's family didn't continue because there was no sales to justify doing so.



As long as you're responding to Dammy, I'll point out that he's referring to a lawsuit settled. That would not be CommodoreUSA. That would be Commodore Holdings, the parent company.

I'll refer you to your own forum for that topic:
http://www.amiga.org/forums/showpost.php?p=757745&postcount=22

#6
 

Offline MinuousTopic starter

Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #114 on: March 02, 2014, 03:22:18 AM »
Quote from: RobertJDohnert;759978
Actually, it was Commodore Amiga, two words that met the criteria.  Commodore Amiga is not generic, Amiga is.

No, you are still wrong. The *entire* phrase (quoting from official Amiga documentation, eg. "Using the System Software" manual) is "Amiga is a registered trademark of Commodore-Amiga, Inc.".
 

Offline RobertJDohnert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 17
    • Show only replies by RobertJDohnert
    • http://www.os4online.com
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #115 on: March 02, 2014, 04:47:25 AM »
Quote from: Minuous;759995
No, you are still wrong. The *entire* phrase (quoting from official Amiga documentation, eg. "Using the System Software" manual) is "Amiga is a registered trademark of Commodore-Amiga, Inc.".


Actually, No Im not but none of this matters considering Bill McEwen, nor Ben Hermans has the balls to take me or anyone else to court to try and defend something they know they CANNOT.  So, unless you have anything of real substance.  Dont call me I'll call YOU.
 

Offline RobertJDohnert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 17
    • Show only replies by RobertJDohnert
    • http://www.os4online.com
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #116 on: March 02, 2014, 04:48:19 AM »
This has turned into a redundant argument because NO ONE CARES.
 

Offline cgutjahr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2003
  • Posts: 697
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by cgutjahr
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #117 on: March 02, 2014, 05:33:14 AM »
Quote from: RobertJDohnert;759998
Actually, No Im not

As everybody with two working brain cells can verify, you're wrong of course (again).

"Amiga" is an active registered trademark in the US, in the category "Typeset (Words/letter/Number)", it was also registered as a standard character mark in 2006 - but the latter registration expired in 2011.

Quote
Dont call me I'll call YOU.

Yeah, we noticed.
 

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show only replies by persia
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #118 on: March 02, 2014, 02:59:53 PM »
BigBenAussie?  He's sort of disappeared since CUSA folded.  He was close to Barry and likely the only one who shared his vision.  But he'd need financial backers.

The X64 was inspired but very niche, ultimately Barry failed to establish a non-niche product.


Quote from: dammy;759975
I was going to release stuff this past December, but someone else (who also knew Barry) might be attempting something so I'm going to hold my tongue on this subject awhile longer.  I don't think I should rock any boats right now.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline slaapliedje

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 843
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • Show only replies by slaapliedje
Re: Infringement of AmigaOS trademark
« Reply #119 on: March 03, 2014, 06:51:57 PM »
Quote from: persia;760016
BigBenAussie?  He's sort of disappeared since CUSA folded.  He was close to Barry and likely the only one who shared his vision.  But he'd need financial backers.

The X64 was inspired but very niche, ultimately Barry failed to establish a non-niche product.

Yeah, they really were too expensive, and the 'Amiga-like' cases were just rebadged cases from one of the HTPC style manufacturers if I recall.  

While I didn't necessarily agree with CommodoreUSA's plans, it was kind of sad to see them go, it was just another reminder of Commodore's demise.  Similar to the talks of Atari going bankrupt a few years ago.  Even though it's no longer the Atari or Commodore we love(d), it's a reminder of what was once great, that faded away.

It still boggles my mind how Apple, that no one I even knew had any of their stuff back in the day, had survived, but yet everyone I know had either Atari or Commodore computers, and they both died out.

As I always say, it seems the worse technology always wins out because it's 'cheap'.

slaapliedje
A4000D: Mediator 4000Di; Voodoo 3, ZorRAM 128MB, 10/100mb Ethernet, Spider 2. Cyberstorm PPC 060/50 604e/420.