:biglaugh: See? It's the same problem that has existed for a long time in the Amiga community.
Look at this example:
MSI NVIDIA GeForce GT 640, 4GB 128-Bit DDR3, HDMI, DL-DVI-D, VGA, PCI Express 3.0 Graphics Card N640-4GD3http://www.amazon.com/MSI-GeForce-DL-DVI-D-Graphics-N640-4GD3/dp/B00BGUEWKC/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1377013866&sr=1-1&keywords=MSI+4GB+video+cardThat is the kind of card someone with "Amiga OS" should be buying these days. The focus: on Amiga OS being able to use such. (read: plentiful, accessible, inexpensive hardware).
Custom = expensive.
Commodity hardware doesn't equal (!=) bad, necessarily.
The PC world--whether deliberate or not; whether stumbling upon the idea 'accidentally' or not--basically saw video graphics cards become like the AGNUS or FAT AGNUS chip. That's how a modern Amiga OS should handle modern video graphics cards, at any rate.
And beyond the one linked above, which has 4 Gigabytes of video RAM (compare that to the idea of the agnus chip, okay?), there are cards with greater RAM. 8GB, 16GB, etc. It never ends; new products continually arrive, with better features. Faster, greater capacity, and so on.
I always find it funny when today's developers of the Amiga 'market' (if one can call its paltry size a market) haven't evolved or changed. Of course, part of the fault and blame and problem has been those developing the Amiga OS itself, or handling that, to move the OS into the future. Why do I find it funny? Because PAST luminaries of the Amiga have agreed with my viewpoint. Carl Sassenrath agreed on the remarkable and interesting notion of the Amiga OS on an exokernel (and there have been discussions that Exec was closer to an exokernel rather than microkernel). Dave Haynie has commented before about using modern hardware. It just makes no sense not to.
Most of the moves by those at the controls of Amiga OS or its hardware have equated to: "Let's keep this a NICHE platform. Our own little hobby. Anyone who wants to pay, will greatly pay." Or some similar attitude. The behavior and reality proves this. And Gateway's 'We didn't buy Amiga to make it smaller'...? :lol:
Now it's gone full circle. From the SPLIT between Amiga and Commodore, with ESCOM selling both to different parties... to Commodore now owning Amiga again. I think that's one whole chapter that is over now. So many changes of hands, and what...really...has advanced?
And, just for the record, I never did buy the idea that a new computer or OS couldn't come along to challenge what is currently out there "because what is currently out there is so massive and ubiquitous", etc. At ANY time, a real rebel may come along and challenge the status quo. That's how we all advance. All it takes is willpower to do it--and the money follows the willpower, if you've got a good enough idea.
Approached differently, an Amiga OS being able to run boards like the one I linked above... could create the scenario where these developers of the currently overpriced hardware (or: hardware priced high to recoup because of low production numbers, to be fair) focus their attention on creating boards that compete. Unless some developers are just lazy and old and don't want to push themselves to be Amiga-like.

Nothing stops them from using off-the-shelf parts, just like the modern board makers do. I mean, they do that, anyway. In the end, a capacitor is just a capacitor, a resistor a resistor, and silicon, and so on.
Amiga, to be anything more than an extremely niche hobby OS, is going to require a sea change of thinking. It's going to require some DARING. One good thing: nobody would EVERY expect anything from it; so it has the advantage of rivals underestimating it--even to the point of ridicule and naysaying. "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win"--Ghandi. The element of surprise, like the old Hi-Toro joystick-maker front idea.
But this is just talk, I guess. Nothing will probably change. People don't like change. People are scared of change. It's as uncomfortable as the truth, which is ironically eternal.
:hat: