Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development  (Read 24869 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1521
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #44 on: April 03, 2013, 07:14:38 AM »
Quote from: wawrzon;731049
can buying it second hand qualify as "support"? will that have an influence on their price/performance, what do you think?


Ofcourse it can, if the sellers intends to buy a newer system.
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1521
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #45 on: April 03, 2013, 07:18:27 AM »
@commodorejohn I know you have never used AOS4.x, which makes your complaining meaningless.
 

Offline commodorejohn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 3165
    • Show only replies by commodorejohn
    • http://www.commodorejohn.com
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #46 on: April 03, 2013, 07:46:34 AM »
Quote from: yssing;731075
I know you have never used AOS4.x, which makes your complaining meaningless.
My complaining about OS4 machines being too expensive for a lot of us is meaningless because I've never used OS4 (because it only runs on machines which are too expensive for a lot of us?)

Right.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"\'Legacy code\' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup
 

Offline AmigaClassicRule

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 956
    • Show only replies by AmigaClassicRule
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1521
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #48 on: April 03, 2013, 09:16:21 AM »
@John, you complaining about the price is just one thing though. You did tell me there where things that AOS4.1 can't do that windows can do, which was another complaint of yours. Again, what are those things?
 

Offline yssing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1521
    • Show only replies by yssing
    • http://www.yssing.org
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #49 on: April 03, 2013, 09:18:17 AM »
Quote from: AmigaClassicRule;731077
Can AmigaOS 4.x hardware beat this price?

http://www.ncix.com/products/?sku=80960&vpn=M5A97%20R2.0%2BFD8320FRHKBOX&manufacture=Bundle%20Deals


No that is where the "number of sales" thing come in, you know market and demand stuff. But I bet that the more people who actually buy AOS4.x compliant hardware, the cheaper it will get in the long run.
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #50 on: April 03, 2013, 11:01:16 AM »
Quote from: antikk;731018
By people buying their products offcourse. So they can make faster and better/cheaper hardware in the future.


I dont think your buying volume is big enough to make difference.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline antikk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 49
    • Show only replies by antikk
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #51 on: April 03, 2013, 11:34:14 AM »
Atleast i'm doing what i can to make a difference, in a positive way.

Quote from: itix;731089
I dont think your buying volume is big enough to make difference.
 

Offline Borut

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 140
    • Show only replies by Borut
    • http://www.crt-software.com
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #52 on: April 03, 2013, 11:48:18 AM »
Quote from: itix;731089
I dont think your buying volume is big enough to make difference.


Than it means buying a copy of MorphOS makes also no big difference?
 

Offline utri007

Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #53 on: April 03, 2013, 11:50:48 AM »
aCube manufactures PPC bords for industrial purpose, if they could manufacture bords just for just for Amiga user, I would say that price would lower. Lots of useless thing could be removed and make boards more cheaper.

So I would say that it is possible to make a diffrence.
ACube Sam 440ep Flex 800mhz, 1gb ram and 240gb hd and OS4.1FE
A1200 Micronic tower, OS3.9, Apollo 060 66mhz, xPert Merlin, Delfina Lite and Micronic Scandy, 500Gb hd, 66mb ram, DVD-burner and WLAN.
A1200 desktop, OS3.9, Blizzard 060 66mhz, 66mb ram, Ide Fix Express with 160Gb HD and WLAN
A500 OS2.1, GVP+HD8 with 4mb ram, 1mb chip ram and 4gb HD
Commodore CDTV KS3.1, 1mb chip, 4mb fast ram and IDE HD
 

Offline Frags

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by Frags
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #54 on: April 03, 2013, 12:07:58 PM »
Is that actually happening though or was it just the original plan?  I guess only Acube knows but given the (understandably) high price, I`m not sure they have industrial customers yet.
-insert clever profundity here-
 

Online jj

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 4052
  • Country: wales
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by jj
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #55 on: April 03, 2013, 12:46:22 PM »
In a shocking totally unexpected turn of events, an Amiga Os annoucement turns into argument about the best NG Os and hardware prices
“We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw

Xbox Live: S0ulA55a551n2
 
Registered MorphsOS 3.13 user on Powerbook G4 15"
 

Offline Frags

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2005
  • Posts: 89
    • Show only replies by Frags
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #56 on: April 03, 2013, 12:52:27 PM »
The reason this happens (which I think is fairly obvious to be honest) is that people click on a thread, read the last page and respond to the last few posts, not the original post.  It`s like Chinese whispers.

edit:  Real conversations do this as well don`t they?
-insert clever profundity here-
 

Offline Terminills

  • Grand Conspirator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 594
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • Show only replies by Terminills
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #57 on: April 03, 2013, 01:06:45 PM »
Quote from: utri007;731098
aCube manufactures PPC bords for industrial purpose, if they could manufacture bords just for just for Amiga user, I would say that price would lower. Lots of useless thing could be removed and make boards more cheaper.

So I would say that it is possible to make a diffrence.



AOS4 compatibility?   That's 1/4 of the price right there. :P
Support AROS sponsor a developer.

edited by mod: this has been addressed
 

Offline Terminills

  • Grand Conspirator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2003
  • Posts: 594
  • Country: 00
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • Show only replies by Terminills
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #58 on: April 03, 2013, 01:09:53 PM »
Quote from: JJ;731104
In a shocking totally unexpected turn of events, an Amiga Os annoucement turns into argument about the best NG Os and hardware prices



That's because everyone knows Windows for Workgroups 3.11 is the best.  >.<
Support AROS sponsor a developer.

edited by mod: this has been addressed
 

Offline mongo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 964
    • Show only replies by mongo
Re: Status report on AmigaOS 4.2 development
« Reply #59 from previous page: April 03, 2013, 02:18:35 PM »
Quote from: yssing;731080
You did tell me there where things that AOS4.1 can't do that windows can do, which was another complaint of yours. Again, what are those things?


Are you serious?