Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: General 68000 hardware inquiry  (Read 4717 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AniwayTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 87
    • Show only replies by Aniway
General 68000 hardware inquiry
« on: July 07, 2012, 11:29:06 PM »
Has anyone ever had a problem when working intimately with the 680xx of being disturbed by clarity from mobile analog 680xx's in action?

I was wondering if this was what had bankrupted Commodore, because of perceived peace-of-mind vulnerabilities and superceding the unbroken cohesion of the home computing experience.
 

Offline Pentad

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2012, 01:51:29 AM »
Quote from: Aniway;699379
Has anyone ever had a problem when working intimately with the 680xx of being disturbed by clarity from mobile analog 680xx's in action?

I was wondering if this was what had bankrupted Commodore, because of perceived peace-of-mind vulnerabilities and superceding the unbroken cohesion of the home computing experience.


No, Commodore was a company with idiots at the helm.
Linux User (Arch & OpenSUSE TW) - WinUAE via WINE
 

Offline Haranguer

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 138
    • Show only replies by Haranguer
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2012, 02:42:51 AM »
I've gotta agree with Pentad.  Commodore went bankrupt due to repeated, well-aimed shots at their own feet.
 

Offline smerf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1666
    • Show only replies by smerf
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2012, 06:20:18 AM »
Quote from: Pentad;699384
No, Commodore was a company with idiots at the helm.


Hi,

Yeah, thats what happens when you let them foreigners run the helm, they stop all progress, bankrupt the company, and then take off with the money.

Everything was fine when Jack ran the company.

smerf
I have no idea what your talking about, so here is a doggy with a small pancake on his head.

MorphOS is a MAC done a little better
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2012, 07:39:35 AM »
Keep in mind that the ruthless despots who ran Commodore (into the ground) had some absolute geniuses designing there actual hardware (not the frigging models) and software; who else runs a sewer through a playground? No, wrong punch line; who else runs preemptive multitasking in a Gaming Machine?

Oh, that's right, that earlier answer was to what type of engineer is God -- a civil engineer. Now the earlier punchline
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2012, 09:05:32 AM »
Smerf,

You are aware that Jack Tramel was a Polish emigrant who was in Auschwitz concentration camp (for being Jewish, not Polish). After the war he came to Canada and established his typewriter repair company. So he actually was a foreigner, at least to non-Polish, non-Canadian persons.

Actually if you believe that "native Americans" crossed the Bering Straits via a land bridge thousands of years ago, all Amercans are "foreigners."  The Latin origin, Foras, means [coming from] outside [lands].  Hence everybody is a "foreigner" when not from a common land
 

Offline motrucker

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2012, 01:17:44 PM »
Quote from: Aniway;699379
Has anyone ever had a problem when working intimately with the 680xx of being disturbed by clarity from mobile analog 680xx's in action?

I was wondering if this was what had bankrupted Commodore, because of perceived peace-of-mind vulnerabilities and superceding the unbroken cohesion of the home computing experience.

In a word, no. In the last couple of years, Commodore was run by thieves. Why Gould and Ali were never prosecuted is beyond me....
A2000 GVP 40MHz \'030, 21Mb RAM SD/FF, 2 floppies, internal CD-ROM drive, micromys v3 w/laser mouse
A1000 Microbotics Starboard II w/2Mb 1080, & external floppy (AIRdrive)
C-128 w/1571, 1750, & Final Cartridge III+
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2012, 01:50:49 PM »
Who owned Commodore?
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2012, 09:33:41 PM »
Who owned Commodore?  The investors. Who killed Commodore?  Gould primarily with help from others. How did they kill Commodore? With greed, poor advertising, and stupid marketing decisions that are complex:  the C64 should have progressed to a 16-bit version and the Amiga line should have been cleaned up (read Steve Jobs bio on how he turned Apple around from near failure).  This is my opinion
 

Offline WolfToTheMoon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 408
    • Show only replies by WolfToTheMoon
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2012, 10:09:04 PM »
Quote from: danbeaver;699575
Who owned Commodore?  The investors. Who killed Commodore?  Gould primarily with help from others. How did they kill Commodore? With greed, poor advertising, and stupid marketing decisions that are complex:  the C64 should have progressed to a 16-bit version and the Amiga line should have been cleaned up (read Steve Jobs bio on how he turned Apple around from near failure).  This is my opinion


Yes, a 65816 based C64 successor. A big missed opportunity, IMHO.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show only replies by freqmax
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2012, 11:20:26 PM »
There was a window of oppertunity for a C64 with a Z80 for some more processing power ;)

What screwed Commodore was downsizing essential development (R&D), nonexistant advertising, lack of straight line of model features. This seems to be caused by Gould allowing Ali (and other?) which lacked visions and were technological incomptent in to a controlling position.

Customers just won't spend money on the same crap in different packaging. It better have some cool features in the hardware.

Conclusion: Spend R&D, advertise, save money for hard times, have a vision!
 

Offline danbeaver

Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2012, 01:02:35 AM »
Ok, 'nuff said on that

Back to the 68000: an excellent CPU choice for its memory map. Straight up memory access with plenty of helpful traps to catch errors. The 8086 (please, only a cheap fool would use an 8088, OOPs!) had a paged based memory map and fewer traps for errors. Now both were readily available and reasonably priced. Both were simple without FPU & MMU. Speed ranges were similar. The 68000 was a better design for a multitasking environment with the 8086 requiring the LIM 4.0 paged memory model to use more than 640k. In upward development the 80386 began to show slightly better advanced and costs fell with licencing to AMD.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show only replies by freqmax
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2012, 07:30:38 PM »
Alpha seemed neat too, Guess PowerPC were too. But all good processors seems to vanish. Or is there any currently nice processor that is resonable priced?
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2012, 08:45:41 PM »
Quote from: WolfToTheMoon;699578
Yes, a 65816 based C64 successor. A big missed opportunity, IMHO.

G65SC816? Ugh.

Quote from: danbeaver;699700
In upward development the 80386 began to show  slightly better advanced and costs fell with licencing to AMD.

AMD had licenses stretching back to the 8086.

"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline AniwayTopic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 87
    • Show only replies by Aniway
Re: General 68000 hardware inquiry
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2012, 11:08:16 AM »
Quote from: motrucker;699539
In a word, no. In the last couple of years, Commodore was run by thieves. Why Gould and Ali were never prosecuted is beyond me....


I thought the beauty of the corporate model -- I presume C= was a corporation -- was that the stockholders hold regular elections and can vote out anyone who does a bad job. If Gould and Ali did such a bad job, why not vote them out "next election" and hire more popular leadership?

But of course it's too late for that. Still, I gotta wonder why the corporate model failed.