Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC  (Read 9697 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AmigaClassicRuleTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 956
    • Show only replies by AmigaClassicRule
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #29 on: February 18, 2012, 07:21:45 PM »
Quote from: Thorham;680911
SAMs are not Amigas, when will people understand this? Probably never :lol:


Is the new AmigaOne X1000 then an Amiga or it stands the same probability as Sam460? Thanks in advance.

Hey if I upgrade my Amiga 1200 to Apollo 1260 would it break any gaming comapibility or I would have the same gaming experience as the 030 cpu? Off topic here.
 

Offline Everblue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 584
    • Show only replies by Everblue
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #30 on: February 18, 2012, 07:50:43 PM »
AmigaClassicsRule have you considered the upcoming Arcade FPGA =) - you can put a real 060 on it.
 

Offline Duce

  • Off to greener pastures
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 1699
    • Show only replies by Duce
    • http://amigabbs.blogspot.com/
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #31 on: February 18, 2012, 07:58:00 PM »
Quote from: Nostromo;680915
AmigaClassicsRule have you considered the upcoming Arcade FPGA =) - you can put a real 060 on it.

^^ This.  I am eagerly looking forward to the FPGArcade with the add on board, seems the ultimate solution.

AGA Amiga on the FPGArcade itself - check

Ethernet and '060 on the daughterboard - check

Small footprint, low power usage, excellent price compared to Ebaying a bunch of old kit and cobbling together an A1200 - check

Codebase/firmware that will always be worked on and improved - check
 

Offline Kremlar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 393
    • Show only replies by Kremlar
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #32 on: February 18, 2012, 07:59:17 PM »
Quote
4) save in my electric bill as I am using 400+watt power supply but the SAM 460 need only 100 watt to run. Saving a lot in heat and energy.

How many watts does a typical Sam460 consume?
 

Offline Digiman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1045
    • Show only replies by Digiman
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2012, 08:52:06 PM »
My 90w PSU for my 2.23ghz 64bit Core 2 Duo Inspiron 9400 uses less power than all of those and has HD1200p rez. Not a reason to buy it though!
 

Offline danwood

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2004
  • Posts: 485
    • Show only replies by danwood
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2012, 09:00:21 PM »
Quote from: Duce;680830

As for boot times, my Win7 PC boots just as quick as my SAM with OS4.1u4, both running SSDs.


Yeah, since Update 3 OS4.1's boot time has become a lot slower, it's the same as my Windows 7 PC now as well.  Hopefully it'll be restored to how it was pre-update 3 at some point, I could soft reboot in around 3-5 seconds then, more like 25-30 now.
 

Offline Hans_

Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #35 on: February 18, 2012, 09:08:33 PM »
Quote from: Kremlar;680917
How many watts does a typical Sam460 consume?


I happen to have my machines hooked up via a power meter, and the Sam460ex consumes approx. 18 Watts when sitting idle in Workbench, 21 Watts when compiling, and 24 Watts when it's running Composite3DDemo. This is with a Radeon HD 4650 graphics card.

Hans
Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work
 

Offline Kremlar

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 393
    • Show only replies by Kremlar
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #36 on: February 18, 2012, 09:13:29 PM »
Curious, because you can configure some pretty low power PCs.  My i3-2100t HTPCs with 8GB RAM consume around 16w at idle, and bump up to the low 20s when playing back full bitrate BluRays ripped to MKVs.
 

Offline Kesa

  • Ninja Fruit Slasher
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2408
    • Show only replies by Kesa
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #37 on: February 18, 2012, 10:11:02 PM »
Quote from: dammy;680910
It's not an NG Amiga, it's a SAM460 running OS4.

Interesting. I guess we could say something similar about CUSA's C64x and their new "Amiga" line.
Even my cat doesn\'t like me.
 

Offline carvedeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 1563
    • Show only replies by carvedeye
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #38 on: February 18, 2012, 11:07:21 PM »
Quote from: Thorham;680911
SAMs are not Amigas, when will people understand this? Probably never :lol:


Really? I have a sam440ep and i was always under the impression that it was a NG amiga or was i mislead?
A1200T: M1230XA 50Mhz 68030 w/64mb,DVDRom, 80gb hdd, Realtek LAN Card, Mediator LT4 + Radeon 9250 128mb(used for fast ram), Spider USB Card, Voodoo 3 3000 OS 3.9 +bb 1-3
 

Offline Duce

  • Off to greener pastures
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 1699
    • Show only replies by Duce
    • http://amigabbs.blogspot.com/
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #39 on: February 18, 2012, 11:13:18 PM »
@ Danwood:

Yeah, boot times have gotten longer, sadly.  I chalk it up to the new AmigaOS 4.1 bootup "splashscreen" that came in u3?,  I think.  It literally is prolonging the boot process time wise by like 75%+.

Anyone know if this can be turned off?  It's a real pain in the ass, the machine sans splashscreen could have been cold booted 3 times with a SSD in the time you sit waiting on the splashscreen, if the splashscreen was optional.  I don't recall seeing any switch options or ways to disable it in the docs, but I could have very well missed something.
 

Offline AmigaClassicRuleTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 956
    • Show only replies by AmigaClassicRule
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #40 on: February 18, 2012, 11:33:10 PM »
If I buy the Apollo 1260 would I be able to run all WHDLOAD games with no problem? Would it effect my gaming compatibility? Thanks in advance.
 

Offline Hans_

Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #41 on: February 18, 2012, 11:47:37 PM »
Quote from: Kremlar;680926
Curious, because you can configure some pretty low power PCs.  My i3-2100t HTPCs with 8GB RAM consume around 16w at idle, and bump up to the low 20s when playing back full bitrate BluRays ripped to MKVs.


I think that a fair bit of the power consumption in my case is the graphics card. The PPC460ex processor uses ~6.35W at 1 GHz with DDR2 RAM (according to the datasheet that I looked at), but the Radeon HD 4650 has a TDP of 48W (if you trust wikipedia).

The idle power consumption could probably be trimmed further if power-management was implemented in the RadeonHD driver. As things currently stand, the GPU and VRAM are always run at max clock-speeds and voltages.

EDIT: Likewise, idle power consumption could probably be reduced a bit if unused hardware such as the on-board graphics card could be powered down completely.

Hans
« Last Edit: February 19, 2012, 12:01:14 AM by Hans_ »
Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work
 

Offline Tempest

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2004
  • Posts: 290
    • Show only replies by Tempest
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #42 on: February 18, 2012, 11:55:50 PM »
Quote from: AmigaClassicRule;680933
If I buy the Apollo 1260 would I be able to run all WHDLOAD games with no problem? Would it effect my gaming compatibility? Thanks in advance.


A 68030 card is the most compatible with whdload games, on a 68060 card some games do have slowdown problems with whdload. I owned a Cyberstorm PPC card with 060 and games like Sensible Soccer and Chaos Engine had slowdown problems.

IMHO stick with a 030 card if you mainly play whdload games on your Amiga.
 

Offline Hans_

Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #43 on: February 18, 2012, 11:56:25 PM »
Quote from: Duce;680932
@ Danwood:

Yeah, boot times have gotten longer, sadly.  I chalk it up to the new AmigaOS 4.1 bootup "splashscreen" that came in u3?,  I think.  It literally is prolonging the boot process time wise by like 75%+.


I highly doubt that the new splash-screen is the cause. AmigaOS 4.x has had a boot screen for ages, and changing the colour of the pixels won't suddenly slow it down. Have you added "run >NIL:" in front of the line that starts up networking? Maybe you used to have that, and forgot to reinsert it after an update. The complete line in my startup-sequence reads:

Run >NIL: NIL: Execute S:Network-Startup

Quote
Anyone know if this can be turned off?  It's a real pain in the ass, the machine sans splashscreen could have been cold booted 3 times with a SSD in the time you sit waiting on the splashscreen, if the splashscreen was optional.  I don't recall seeing any switch options or ways to disable it in the docs, but I could have very well missed something.


Like I said above, I doubt that disabling the splash screen will make a difference. Nevertheless, if you dislike it so much, commenting out "MODULE Kickstart/bootimage" in the kicklayout should get rid of it.

Hans
Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work
 

Offline Tempest

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2004
  • Posts: 290
    • Show only replies by Tempest
Re: Buying SAM 460 to replace my PC
« Reply #44 from previous page: February 19, 2012, 12:06:35 AM »
Quote from: carvedeye;680931
Really? I have a sam440ep and i was always under the impression that it was a NG amiga or was i mislead?

Yep, it's just an Amiga clone like Aros and MorphOS. IMHO no matter how much money you spend on it, it's still not a real Amiga. 97% of the software available for OS4 is just a mediocre to bad Linux port. Sorry but everything you can run on a 1000+$ Sam440ep runs better on a 50$ x86 running Linux.
« Last Edit: February 19, 2012, 12:09:26 AM by Tempest »