Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz  (Read 1705 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Abou27Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 306
    • Show only replies by Abou27
    • http://www.renault-agriculture.co.uk/forums/
FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« on: January 08, 2004, 08:24:13 PM »
Hi there,

  My Blizzard 1230IV 50 Mhz has no FPU :-(   I have been waiting for a month and a half for a 50Mhz FPU to arrive from AmigaSuperBit but no luck.  Can't seem to find anywhere else that offers them.  However, I see plenty of places that do 40Mhz ones and was considering ordering one.  This made a little bell buried deeply in my head start to tingle a little.  I seem to remember hearing that one shouldn't pair a CPU with a lesser FPU.  Is this true and, if so, why?  Would it damage my accelerator if I tried?
 

Offline x56h34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 2921
    • Show only replies by x56h34
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2004, 08:33:49 PM »
Get it from Vesalia.

They have a 40Mhz 68882 PGA FPU which has passed testing at 50Mhz. I've been using one of those in my B1230-IV for months and then I sold that whole card on eBay, but for that time period I haven't experienced any problems with the 40Mhz FPU running at 50Mhz.
 

Offline Lemonty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2003
  • Posts: 193
    • Show only replies by Lemonty
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2004, 08:34:20 PM »
I bought a 40mHz FPU for my BlizzardIV030 (50mHz) a few years back. At the store they told me there would not be a problem. True, the FPU works ok for about half an hour after which FPU related apps start failing. I guess heat is the main problem. My A1200 is a standard desktop one and has very limited ventilation (particularly in the trapdoor area even with the lid off).
I guess you are ok with a 40mHz FPU provided you have cooling sorted or your 1200 is towered.
Respect My Authority!
 

Offline Abou27Topic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 306
    • Show only replies by Abou27
    • http://www.renault-agriculture.co.uk/forums/
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2004, 08:54:42 PM »
Cheers guys - good to see both sides!  I'm in a desktop and want the FPU to speed up Real3D mostly so will have to give this some thought.  I suppose they are not that expensive to try one out as long as they don't damage board!  Anyone else have experience of this?  See if the 50:50 split continues!
 

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2004, 09:43:15 PM »
25% overclocking is quite abit so you do need some kind of cooling on it, especialy as you're saying you're going to put heavy useage on it. I belive a coolingplate should be enough but if you experience crashing FPU apps then add a fan. I doubt that the FPU will damage the rest of the turboboard even if it was to break down.

Offline x56h34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2003
  • Posts: 2921
    • Show only replies by x56h34
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2004, 09:49:43 PM »
@Brian:

I agree in general, however the ones sold at Vesalia have been tested to run OK @ 50Mhz (it says so in description). I guess the best thing is to try and see, as you've suggested.
 

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2003
  • Posts: 1604
    • Show only replies by Brian
    • http://www.syntaxsociety.se
Re: FPU Mhz < CPU Mhz
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2004, 10:08:10 AM »
That it's been tested and working at 50Mhz doesn't say it doesn't use any cooling to do so... much like 060 going at 66Mhz.