Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Peg II vs Sam 440  (Read 4473 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pan1kTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 841
    • Show only replies by pan1k
Peg II vs Sam 440
« on: November 16, 2011, 05:19:37 PM »
Which machine would run 4.1 better? That is all.. :) Looking to get the best 'bang' for my buck.
A4K: \\\'060, Cyberstorm MKIII Cybervision 64/3D w/ Scandoubler, Buddha Flash XSurf, MP3@64, A4K: \\\'040, Toaster, Y/C, A1200: Apollo \\\'040, A1200 GVP \'030, A1200: Stock, A2000: 68K, Trump SCSI, Supra 8Mb, and Toaster 4K, A2500: \\\'030, GVP SCSI, Supra 8MB x2, Video Toaster, CD32, Minimig, Efika and Hopefully an A4000T soon!
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2011, 05:21:41 PM »
Quote from: pan1k;668086
Which machine would run 4.1 better? That is all.. :) Looking to get the best 'bang' for my buck.


Definitely the Pegasos 2.
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline pan1kTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2004
  • Posts: 841
    • Show only replies by pan1k
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2011, 05:30:52 PM »
Plus I can run MorphOS and 4.1 on the Peg... hmm decisions decisions.. i want to get a modern Amiga system going for myself...
A4K: \\\'060, Cyberstorm MKIII Cybervision 64/3D w/ Scandoubler, Buddha Flash XSurf, MP3@64, A4K: \\\'040, Toaster, Y/C, A1200: Apollo \\\'040, A1200 GVP \'030, A1200: Stock, A2000: 68K, Trump SCSI, Supra 8Mb, and Toaster 4K, A2500: \\\'030, GVP SCSI, Supra 8MB x2, Video Toaster, CD32, Minimig, Efika and Hopefully an A4000T soon!
 

Offline Tension

Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2011, 05:32:55 PM »
peg2

Offline skurk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2006
  • Posts: 929
    • Show only replies by skurk
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2011, 05:38:53 PM »
I'd pick the one with the newest hardware and support.
Code 6502 asm or... DIE!!

[C64, C128, A500, A600, A1200, A3000, MBP+Mini, Efika/MOS2.1, Sam440 w/AOS4.1
 

Offline zylesea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 638
    • Show only replies by zylesea
    • http://www.via-altera.de
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2011, 05:48:49 PM »
Quote from: pan1k;668086
Which machine would run 4.1 better? That is all.. :) Looking to get the best 'bang' for my buck.

The PegII has the more powerful CPU - the 7447 has altivec, is 1.15 times faster per clock than the 460ex and its L2 cache is twice the size (512 kb vs. 256kb). The Sam has faster RAM though.
I would go for the PegII - support is good (if something fails bplan are still fixing the machines) and it runs MorphOS, too.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 08:39:13 PM by zylesea »
 

Offline takemehomegrandma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2990
    • Show only replies by takemehomegrandma
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2011, 05:59:21 PM »
@ zylesea

Indeed the Peg2 even wins over Sam 460, and the Sam 440 (which is on topic here) is miles behind. If "bang" alone is what you want, the choice is pretty clear. The same if you look at "buck" alone. And if you're looking for "bang for the buck" combined, it's a walk over victory...
MorphOS is Amiga done right! :)
 

Offline vox

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 862
    • Show only replies by vox
    • http://anticusa.wordpress.com
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2011, 06:36:33 PM »
Quote from: pan1k;668086
Which machine would run 4.1 better? That is all.. :) Looking to get the best 'bang' for my buck.


PegII has faster CPU and better bang to the buck ratio.
SAM has faster RAM , plus you can attach newer SATA HDD`s and DVDs and has official repair and support and is fast enough to run OS.

With PegII you could get faster E-UAE, Bledender etc. but not that they are unsable on SAM 440.

PegII can also run MOS.

Now its your call.
Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja and https://www.facebook.com/rasvoja
 

Offline Duce

  • Off to greener pastures
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 1699
    • Show only replies by Duce
    • http://amigabbs.blogspot.com/
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2011, 06:46:51 PM »
PegII for the fact you can run MOS and OS4 on it.  It is a more versatile machine.

My SAM I like a lot due to my dislike for IDE and my love for SATA, even though it's a base model 440ep I find it very usable and peppy.
 

Offline TheDaddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2005
  • Posts: 1154
    • Show only replies by TheDaddy
    • http://www.loriano.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2011, 07:47:06 PM »
My SAM460 has 2GB DDR2 RAM, faster bus, SATA drives, SATA DVD-RW, boots from an OCZ Vertex 3 120GB and in its PCI Express slot it has an ATI Radeon 4890 with 1GB.

I have also got a SAM 440ep 666MHZ 512MB and a flex 800MHz 1GB but I'd go for the 460 if I had to buy another one.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2011, 07:51:20 PM by TheDaddy »
 

Offline amigadave

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2004
  • Posts: 3836
    • Show only replies by amigadave
    • http://www.EfficientByDesign.org
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2011, 08:29:20 PM »
Quote from: pan1k;668088
Plus I can run MorphOS and 4.1 on the Peg... hmm decisions decisions.. i want to get a modern Amiga system going for myself...

You should definitely go for the Peg-2 Chris, if you can find one.  That way you can run both OS4 and MorphOS and won't need two computers to check out all the possibilities of modern PPC Amiga systems.

The SAM460 is not a bad system, but is will cost more and it won't let you run both OS4 and MorphOS.  The SAM440ep, or flex is not enough cheaper than the SAM460 to make it an attractive alternative, so if you want a new system, I would say spend the few extra bucks and get the 460, not the 440.

Of course, you could just get a really cheap (or free) G4 Mac to run MorphOS on and save your money to buy more Classic Amiga gear from me.  :laughing:
How are you helping the Amiga community? :)
 

Offline itix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2002
  • Posts: 2380
    • Show only replies by itix
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2011, 09:07:06 PM »
Quote from: pan1k;668086
Which machine would run 4.1 better? That is all.. :) Looking to get the best 'bang' for my buck.


Peg2 is absolutely better because it is faster.
My Amigas: A500, Mac Mini and PowerBook
 

Offline zylesea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2006
  • Posts: 638
    • Show only replies by zylesea
    • http://www.via-altera.de
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2011, 09:22:50 PM »
Quote from: itix;668110
Peg2 is absolutely better because it is faster.

Interestingly in the linked Hollywood benchmark the Pegasos II numbers outperform the Sam460 only if the Peg is running MorphOS. With OS 4.x it is surprising slow (not even half the speed as compared to the MorphOS values on the same machine). Seems there's something wrong with OS4.1 on the Pegasos (or w/ Hollywood & OS4 in general).
Anyway, PegII still the best choice, since it offers most options and has the most powerful cpu of all OS4 systems available today.

Offline Dragster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 1003
  • Country: mx
  • Gender: Male
    • Show only replies by Dragster
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2011, 11:27:53 PM »
I have to agree on the fact that the Peg II is the best choice. It was a no brainer when I bought my two Peg II boards at the time when compared to the SAM boards.
 
Cheaper/faster CPU and no need to buy any more hardware to try (and now to use/enjoy) MorphOS. It may have slower HD/memory access but I prefer a faster CPU anyway and memory/HD access is enough for OS4.x/MOS needs at the moment.
 
Cheers,
 
Dragster.
Amiga 1200T 603/240, 060/50, SCSI II, Plextor 40/12/40S SCSI CDRW, Plextor 40X SCSI CDROM, Fujitsu 36GB 10KRPM SCSI HD, Pioneer 305S SCSI DVD, BVisionPPC, 256 MB FASTRAM, PowerFlyer EIDE, Scandex external scandoubler, ZIV busboard, Algor USB, Wireless, repulse audio...Peg II Quadruple boot: OS4.1FE/MorphOS 3.9 regged, OpenSUSE11.1 & Debian Squeeze, Powerbook G4 1139 MorphOS3.9, A4000D CSPPC/PIV/DENEB OS3.9/4.1FE, A4000T CSPPC/CVPPC/SCSI, etc.. 2
 

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: Peg II vs Sam 440
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2011, 11:40:53 PM »
and you can fit SATA drives using a cheap pci card
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)