>
Is this thread what all the fuss is about!? ...
Why go searching for a reason for this non-existent "fuss"? I never mentioned having a problem with UtilityBase.
I prefer to write software that is usable for various Amiga systems, including 3.0/3.1. I've seen your posts in the past insisting on people to use 3.5/3.9 but many people still use 3.0/3.1 on their lower-end Amigas, which is what I was aiming that particular application at.
It seems that you're determined to go against this idea, which is a shame since you are one of the few programmers left in the Amiga scene. It's just sad that you don't want to be part of a bigger, better team. I could give you a LOT of reasons why UtilityBase is unsuitable, outdated, unmaintained, neglected and underused, but for most of us it's very obvious and I feel explaining to someone who has already made up their mind would be in vain.