Backtracking a little, but the term "custom hardware" gets thrown around a bit as a pro for OS4.x. Now each to his own, but this seems clutching as straws to me. There's next to nothing interesting about these systems in terms of custom hardware, it's predomiantely industry standard gear. I know that "arguement" gets thrown around a bit too, but it happens to be true. For my tastes value can be added to a system if it offers something different. I actually find super aga more interesting (even if Im pretty dubious on natami) than industry standard gfx cards for example, and would pay a little more for it than I would more powerful standard pci/agp/pci express cards..... this type of custom hardware does have a little bit of additional value, but apart from running os4.x the "custom hardware" for that OS offers nothing interesting that should increase its price, or even be consider something for the pro category (infact it's probably in the con list for my tastes considering the price).
And before someone assumes otherwise, no, Im not a MOS user (yet, I may buy in one day), and yes I am interested in OS4 still, although so far the whole thing has reeked of incompetence in most areas,... product choices/prices/long winded courtcases/arguements with parent company/technical merrits vs. similar products/etc.
There's a reason people regularly voice thier discontent with OS4.x, and that's simply because there's plenty to be discontent about.