I would prefer C=USA to use AROS over Linux on two conditions:
1 - They actually make an investment in AROS through contributing to bounties or hiring developers.
2 - THEY DON'T CALL IT WORKBENCH 5!!! (To me that's the equivalent to sticking up their middle finger at Hyperion, especially because of the "5".)
I might actually be interested in a C=USA product under those conditions, but as it is, I'm ANTI-interested (if there can be such a thing).
Right. I think they have just put themselves right into the middle of a war zone. IMHO they have marketed their product range all wrong. Instead of trying to use the Amiga name they should have followed Morphos' philosophy and make a fresh start. They have no legal issues with anyone. The way it should be.
I also think they should use AROS and not Linux. I think they should use Icaros or Broadway distros and name the computer after these. If someone made a Linux computer what name would you prefer? Linux or Ubuntu? I really like the name Ubuntu - it sounds better being named after a distro.
I think they have a good product but they just need to rethink their marketing plan a bit.
@bigbenaussie. You said on Amigaworld.net that it was easier to use linux than Aros. If you modify your marketing plan a bit all the problems you described would go away.