Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: FPGA Replay Board  (Read 822120 times)

Description:

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline AmigaPixel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 388
    • Show only replies by AmigaPixel
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #614 on: May 13, 2011, 09:37:40 AM »
A very exciting project! I haven't had a chance to read the planned specs much, Is it strictly for AGA games or will it be backward compatibe for KS 1.3 OCS/ECS games like the Minimig?
 

Offline Linde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 457
    • Show only replies by Linde
    • http://hata.zor.org/
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #615 on: May 13, 2011, 09:54:06 AM »
I suppose it will be like a real AGA Amiga in that some OCS/ECS games will have to be patched to run properly, or that you'd have to set up ECS compatibility in the early startup menu. As a whdload user, I don't mind either way.
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show only replies by freqmax
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #616 on: May 13, 2011, 10:14:30 AM »
With FPGA it's possible to load any hardware combination you can imagine.

The only thing this FPGA thing lacks is an Zorro bus interface.
 

Offline mikej

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2005
  • Posts: 822
    • Show only replies by mikej
    • http://www.fpgaarcade.com
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #617 on: May 13, 2011, 06:45:34 PM »
Quote from: freqmax;637542
With FPGA it's possible to load any hardware combination you can imagine.

The only thing this FPGA thing lacks is an Zorro bus interface.


The core options, such as AGA enable are set up with the on screen menu. They can actually be switched live (at the moment) but this may make the system fall over. I guess I should force some options to only become active on a restart.

Why do you want a Zorro bus? There are a huge amount of pins to the expansion connector, so I could implement a Zorro bus if needed, and a daughter board bridge. What would you connect though?
Cheers,
MikeJ
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show only replies by freqmax
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #618 on: May 13, 2011, 06:57:51 PM »
I was thinking on say unusual video grabbers etc.. that could need this. I don't think it's worthwhile atm to persue Zorro. But I hope all I/O that would be needed is available at the expansion slot?

Btw, how is XC3S1200 supply?, seems Xilinx is going for Spartan-6 for the "low-end" FPGAs.
 

Offline Belial6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 568
    • Show only replies by Belial6
    • http://www.glasshead.net
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #619 on: May 13, 2011, 07:58:36 PM »
What would be interesting is if the expansion slot could dedicate a pin or two to a low speed serial connection that could query anything plugged in to determine what kind of expansion device was connected.  That way, any expansion devices in the future, like a Zorro slot, could just include the cheapest pic they could get their hands on to respond when the FPGAArcade queries the board, and everything could auto configure.
 

Offline ferrellsl

Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #620 on: May 13, 2011, 08:27:53 PM »
Quote from: freqmax;637542
With FPGA it's possible to load any hardware combination you can imagine.

The only thing this FPGA thing lacks is an Zorro bus interface.



A Zorro bus would be a complete waste.  Nobody is producing any Zorro hardware and why would you want to connect a 20 yr old Zorro device to this system when you have several other interfaces that are modern and more efficient?
 

Offline billt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 910
    • Show only replies by billt
    • http://www.billtoner.net
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #621 on: May 13, 2011, 08:50:45 PM »
Quote from: ferrellsl;637626
A Zorro bus would be a complete waste.  Nobody is producing any Zorro hardware and why would you want to connect a 20 yr old Zorro device to this system when you have several other interfaces that are modern and more efficient?


Educational purposes only I suppose.

http://opencores.org/project,zorro_to_wishbone_bridge
Bill T
All Glory to the Hypnotoad!
 

Offline xyzzy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 74
    • Show only replies by xyzzy
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #622 on: May 13, 2011, 09:09:47 PM »
USB to Zorro bus adapter anyone? :D
 

Offline Darrin

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 4430
    • Show only replies by Darrin
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #623 on: May 13, 2011, 09:58:46 PM »
I think there is an opportunity here for someone like Elbox to produce a Zorro/PCI daughterboard along the lines of the one I have in my towered A4000 for any "power users" who wish to expand the hell out of this board.

It might be something for them to think about.
A2000, A3000, 2 x A1200T, A1200, A4000Tower & Mediator, CD32, VIC-20, C64, C128, C128D, PET 8032, Minimig & ARM, C-One, FPGA Arcade... and AmigaOne X1000.
 

Offline digiflip

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 270
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by digiflip
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #624 on: May 13, 2011, 10:05:39 PM »
or wait for natami or fpga arcade 2
Neptuno, Ultimate MiSTer, vidor Replay, a500+ pistorming, a1200 stock, V4 SA
 

Offline Belial6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 568
    • Show only replies by Belial6
    • http://www.glasshead.net
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #625 on: May 13, 2011, 10:18:53 PM »
While I could see a PCI slot on a future FPGAArcade, I would be shocked to see a Zorro slot.  Remember, FPGAArcade is not an Amiga board.  It is a Retro system board.  Zorro would only have a use for those of us using it for Amiga.
 

Offline mikej

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2005
  • Posts: 822
    • Show only replies by mikej
    • http://www.fpgaarcade.com
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #626 on: May 13, 2011, 10:22:12 PM »
Quote from: freqmax;637611
I was thinking on say unusual video grabbers etc.. that could need this. I don't think it's worthwhile atm to persue Zorro. But I hope all I/O that would be needed is available at the expansion slot?

Btw, how is XC3S1200 supply?, seems Xilinx is going for Spartan-6 for the "low-end" FPGAs.


There is no reason other people can't produce daughter cards - Jakub built his own from my specs. I have a proto-card as well which you can build your own circuits on. You'll get ethernet and usb on my daughter card.

It's a Spartan3e1600 actually. No problems with supply, I've got around 50 arriving next week. I can always get them in China as well. No EOL on these yet.

Spartan6 is very interesting but is quite a bit more expensive at the moment.

Once we've knocked out a few hundred of the current card it may be time to move on, next year I guess.
Cheers,
Mike
 

Offline mikej

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2005
  • Posts: 822
    • Show only replies by mikej
    • http://www.fpgaarcade.com
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #627 on: May 13, 2011, 10:25:28 PM »
"While I could see a PCI slot"
You can already do this with the expansion bus available.
A simple bus mastering PCI core is not hard (I've written one before), but again, not sure I see the point.

For next gen card I would use a Spartan6 and then you could wire up a few SerDes lanes to the expansion connector and have PCIexpress.
/Mike
 

Offline JimS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1155
    • Show only replies by JimS
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #628 on: May 13, 2011, 11:20:10 PM »
I don't see the need for a zorro slot either... A video slot for the Toaster might be slightly sensible. ;-) Or at least something in the "neat hack" category.
Obsolescence is futile. You will be emulated. - Amigus of Borg
 

Offline freqmax

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2006
  • Posts: 2179
    • Show only replies by freqmax
Re: FPGA Replay Board
« Reply #629 from previous page: May 14, 2011, 12:21:56 AM »
Infact PCI-express might be worthwhile if the Spartan-6 rocketports can handle it nativly. The reason is that this could be done with very few signals or I/O slots. Which reduces cost.
These rocketports can also handle S-ATA nativly asfair.

Maybe I should say that the original Zorro comment was a little bit a joke. Ie the only thing missing .. (tm) ;)

The only hardware that may need physical connection are the ones that interface with outside world in areas that the built-in functions won't cover.