Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Down

Author Topic: 68060 Accelerators  (Read 19394 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tone007

Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #74 from previous page: December 24, 2010, 04:36:47 PM »
Quote from: Xanxi;601542
Dude, you know this 944 is not seen as a real Porsche because of the AUDI motor.
Keep your pants as is. :D


924, actually, and what a group of car snobs thinks counts for about nothing.

It was just as crappy as any other Porsche on the road, but handled better.
Logged
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline RMK305

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 506
    • Show only replies by RMK305
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #75 on: December 24, 2010, 06:24:43 PM »
Franko,

You get 66 MIPS from a Blizzard 060/50MHz? I thought thay put out around 40!?
Logged
Amiga 4000, Warp Engine 040/40MHz, CV643D with scan doubler module, Tocatta soundcard, Deneb, 72Meg fast ram, 18 gig scsi hard drive.

3xA500, 1xA1200, 1xCD32
 

Offline Xanxi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2005
  • Posts: 900
    • Show only replies by Xanxi
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #76 on: December 24, 2010, 06:26:57 PM »
Quote from: RMK305;601598
Franko,

You get 66 MIPS from a Blizzard 060/50MHz? I thought thay put out around 40!?


No, that's perfectly normal.
Under 40 value comes from Sysinfo, which is wrong and does not recognize correctly the 060.
Logged
10 Classic Amiga Computers so far: I have too many computers!!
 

Offline fitzsteve

Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #77 on: December 24, 2010, 06:29:05 PM »
Quote from: RMK305;601598
Franko,

You get 66 MIPS from a Blizzard 060/50MHz? I thought thay put out around 40!?

They benchmark an incorrect 40Mips in Sysinfo because it only uses one of the 060's integer units.  If you benchmark with a program that correctly utilises the 060 you'll get 66Mips (Sysspeed is a good example)

Steve.
Logged
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #78 on: December 25, 2010, 10:01:20 AM »
i wonder *if* it was possible for a Bvision to operate @66Mhz PCI bus with a 250Mhz RamDac i wonder if there is a massive performance increase. iv got a feeling migration has already started and is awaiting last minuite modifcation to Blizzard PPC card or maybe it's already working.

such modification *may* possible need extra tracks added to BGA pads.
Logged
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline Ratte

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 380
  • Country: de
    • Show only replies by Ratte
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #79 on: December 25, 2010, 10:08:24 AM »
Logged
 

Offline Buzzfuzz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 377
    • Show only replies by Buzzfuzz
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #80 on: December 25, 2010, 10:36:15 AM »
Quote from: tone007;601559
924, actually, and what a group of car snobs thinks counts for about nothing.
 
It was just as crappy as any other Porsche on the road, but handled better.

Well to put in 060 terms vs a 911 GT3 RS, that really handels good in corners and on a straight line and you just want to rev the engine for fun :roflmao:
Logged
Wishlist: A3500, A2500UX
 

Offline Ratte

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 380
  • Country: de
    • Show only replies by Ratte
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #81 on: December 25, 2010, 05:05:45 PM »
Quote from: Ratte;601696
there is a 132 mips porsche inside ...


unbelievable, it seems to be uninteresting ...
Logged
 

Offline RMK305

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 506
    • Show only replies by RMK305
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #82 on: December 25, 2010, 06:05:08 PM »
No, Looks very interesting to me. Thanks for the link. :)
Logged
Amiga 4000, Warp Engine 040/40MHz, CV643D with scan doubler module, Tocatta soundcard, Deneb, 72Meg fast ram, 18 gig scsi hard drive.

3xA500, 1xA1200, 1xCD32
 

Offline Damion

Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #83 on: December 25, 2010, 06:09:16 PM »
@Ratte

Quote from: Ratte;601744
unbelievable, it seems to be uninteresting ...


I imagine many are just too dumbfounded to respond. Fascinating project - the RAM performance clearly blows away any classic Amiga accelerator ever made.
Logged
 

Offline RMK305

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2005
  • Posts: 506
    • Show only replies by RMK305
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #84 on: December 25, 2010, 06:23:53 PM »
When I look at the CT60 page, it lists the speed of various processors...but they seem very high compared to what I have achieved on Amiga accelerator cards. I know that this is an Atari project, but why such a difference in speed, or are they measuring them differently?

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.powerphenix.com/CT60/english/overview.htm&rurl=translate.google.de&usg=ALkJrhh7oeaVj0iepRq7PS2eBHSMkO8Q5Q
Logged
Amiga 4000, Warp Engine 040/40MHz, CV643D with scan doubler module, Tocatta soundcard, Deneb, 72Meg fast ram, 18 gig scsi hard drive.

3xA500, 1xA1200, 1xCD32
 

Offline mike-

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 438
    • Show only replies by mike-
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #85 on: December 25, 2010, 07:15:49 PM »
Quote from: Franko;600936
Disagree with you totally here on my Blizz060/PPC under both OS3.1 & OS 3.5 PageStream, ImageFX, FinalWriter, and lots more besides run perfectly well WITHOUT AN RTG BOARD... :)

From a few threads that's running here tonight it looks like a lot of folk using 060 boards don't have them set up to take full advantage and squeeze every bit of speed out of their set ups... :)

Of course it could be because your using an Apollo and not a Blizzard as the Blizzard boards are way better than the Apollo ones... ;)


Ill help, got a blizzard 1260 too, patched the living daylights out of it, only one problem though, i use a tvtuner card and the gfx card in that box blew its caps ..... ..... gf7600gt no less... Dont forget tlsf! fscreen also drastically speeds stuff up.
http://aminet.net/package/util/misc/gfxroute
Logged
C= Amiga Addict & Dendrophiliac
,,,
(Oo)
⎛☮ໄ
ﮑὠՀ
 

Offline Xanxi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2005
  • Posts: 900
    • Show only replies by Xanxi
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #86 on: December 25, 2010, 09:51:31 PM »
Quote from: RMK305;601755
When I look at the CT60 page, it lists the speed of various processors...but they seem very high compared to what I have achieved on Amiga accelerator cards. I know that this is an Atari project, but why such a difference in speed, or are they measuring them differently?

http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.powerphenix.com/CT60/english/overview.htm&rurl=translate.google.de&usg=ALkJrhh7oeaVj0iepRq7PS2eBHSMkO8Q5Q



Yeah, none of these values are consistent with amiga accelerators MIPS, but remember that M in MIPS stands for Meaningless.
Logged
10 Classic Amiga Computers so far: I have too many computers!!
 

Offline Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5707
    • Show only replies by Franko
Re: 68060 Accelerators
« Reply #87 on: December 26, 2010, 10:02:07 AM »
Quote from: mike-;601758
Ill help, got a blizzard 1260 too, patched the living daylights out of it, only one problem though, i use a tvtuner card and the gfx card in that box blew its caps ..... ..... gf7600gt no less... Dont forget tlsf! fscreen also drastically speeds stuff up.
http://aminet.net/package/util/misc/gfxroute


I tried gfxroute a while back, didn't seem to work though and caused more problems than it was worth, think I'll just stick with FBlit and the other patches I use as they have been running perfectly stable for years now... :)

Be interested to hear just how you hooked up that TvTuner card and where you got it... :)
Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Up
« previous next »