Point is you are comparing apples and oranges, and maybe you are also putting too much attention to clock frequencies? And who was speaking about HW acceleration in video cards?
A G3 is usually faster than a "G2", for some application more than others. AFAIK a Pegasos 2 G3 is faster than any Sam. And a G4 is even faster, especially the newer ones, and especially for applications where Altivec make sense. As a result, MorphOS on a Mac Mini 1.42GHz plays x.264 720p streams better than a Sam plays DVD streams. A difference in work task that is a magnitude greater than the difference in clock frequency (of course other things affects the results as well, such as bus speed, etc).
Is a SAM considered a G2? I don't think so. It has something like 6 years of newer tech and faster(and much more) main memory than a Gamecube which was a G3.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/858/2The GC did have an incredibly fast memory interface for it's time. Here ACUBE has fixed issues with moving memory hence the improved performance in DVD playback. And besides my point is that SAM does have enough cpu performance to do it and not to compare x86 to PPC.
The memory interface was clearly the problem here. SAM has a DDR(266) interface and my old PC was using SDR(100). SAM should be able to outperform an Athlon 650 on large memory intensive tasks such as DVD playback ... but it wasn't. I don't believe cpu performance has anything to do with it. Even a P2 can decode Divx(@ SD resultions which is what resolution DVD is)...
Interesting: I see here that A1 used PC-133 memory...
http://www.memoryx.net/amigaonexe.html