Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?  (Read 4069 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mantisspider

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2003
  • Posts: 432
    • Show only replies by mantisspider
    • http://www.digitalpowerhouse.net
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #14 from previous page: December 07, 2003, 07:45:41 AM »
Hi Mate,

CU Amiga says that it performs better than Z-II and runs at 8Mb/s.
I was wondering about getting a PCI to ISA adapter and sticking a Voodoo onto the ateo busboard using the voodoo. I am guessing that using the PCI drivers for the voodoo on the amiga wont work on the Ateo busboard.

You think there would be any chance this would work?
 

Offline CU_AMiGATopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2003
  • Posts: 1807
    • Show only replies by CU_AMiGA
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2003, 01:02:09 PM »
Quote

mantisspider wrote:
Hi Mate,

CU Amiga says...........


:lol:

Almost got a bit confused there! :-)
A1200D / AGA / B1260 / 64MB RAM / KS 3.1 / AOS 3.9 / 4GB HD
 

Offline Ryu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1023
    • Show only replies by Ryu
    • http://www.intuitionbase.com
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2003, 01:10:56 PM »
@mantisspider

No such driver exists for a voodoo on the pixel busboard thingy, the only gfx card driver that exists for it is for the Pixel64, I had an ateo setup and man was it slooooooooooow, still good enough for workbench, but that was about it.. also all the people I know who have had or indeed still the ateo bus complain about it being very loose on the accelerator slot, so any slight movement at the who lot refuses to boot, I had the same problem with mine for the short space of time I owned it.
Yours
Darren aka Ryu
-----------------------------
www.IntuitionBase.com
My Amiga 1200 webserver
 

Offline spavatch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 170
    • Show only replies by spavatch
    • http://www.fiatpunto.org/
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2003, 04:28:46 PM »
And how about Voodoo Graphics or Voodoo2? (SLI, yeah baby!) :-) It would be nice, wouldn't it? If Voodoo Banshee and Voodoo3 work nice - why not their predecessors? It seems possible... :-) SLI Voodoo2 would sure be the fastest and and most affordable solution on the market! And ofcourse the most PCI-slot hungry one :-D
Cheers...
Spav
----------------------------------------------------------
Hey, somebody messed with my sig in any way? ;)
Powered by:
A600HD+A620T, CD32+Promodule & A4000/040
 

Offline Crumb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1786
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Crumb
    • http://cuaz.sourceforge.net
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2003, 06:05:31 PM »
@spavatch:
A simple Radeon7000 or 7500 should be MUCH faster than 2Voodoos2... come on... even a simple Voodoo3 was usually faster...

And keep in mind that using 2 voodoo2 usually required to have 2 voodoo2 of the same manofacturer to make them work...

@mantisspider
I would go for a 2nd hand mediator... with the Ateo you get a ISA SVGA card and that's all. A friend of mine tried to make a NE2000 work without luck and has some stability problems...
A 2nd hand Mediator is more expensive but will give you more options...
The only spanish amiga news web page/club: Club de Usuarios de Amiga de Zaragoza (CUAZ)
 

Offline spavatch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 170
    • Show only replies by spavatch
    • http://www.fiatpunto.org/
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2003, 07:39:06 PM »
A simple Radeon would be faster (or not) if there were any drivers... It would be much easier to adapt/convert Voodoo3 drivers for use with older models than write new ones for ATI products. Oh, and remember - as Karlos said: both (Radeon and Voodoo) are attached by buses that are vastly slower than each chip can make use of. I doubt if there would be any performance gain.
Cheers...
Spav
----------------------------------------------------------
Hey, somebody messed with my sig in any way? ;)
Powered by:
A600HD+A620T, CD32+Promodule & A4000/040
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16882
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 6 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: How much of a difference between Voodoo and Blizzardvision?
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2003, 08:00:32 PM »
Actually I was referring to the Permedia2 and Voodoo, but the same would hold true for any Mediator/Prometheus/GRex attached gfx card.

Local operations on the card will naturally be very quick, and faster cards will always do better. However, when you have to send lots of information to the GPU, eventually you will hit the bus limit and that will level out most cards currently used.
int p; // A