Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Copyright continued...  (Read 6850 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #29 from previous page: September 14, 2010, 04:50:35 PM »
Quote from: Franko;579289
@Piru
I've seen you use the term Strawman quite often, could you please explain what it means, it's not something we use this side of the pond... ta :)

Hmm I do? I don't recall. However, here goes: Fallacy Files: Straw man
 

Offline Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5707
    • Show only replies by Franko
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2010, 04:53:35 PM »
Quote from: Piru;579293
Hmm I do? I don't recall. However, here goes: Fallacy Files: Straw man


Cheers Piru... that's cleared that one up... :)
 

Offline kolla

Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2010, 05:04:53 PM »
I don't quite grasp what the fuzz is about in that case. The software in question was not software bought in a store by a private person, but software licensed to a company from the software manufactorer. This is quite normal, companies typically buy licenses for software and not the software itself, and the content of the license is typically negotiatable - for example in the company I work for, we have software with licenses that allow us to install the software on our private machines and machines owned by our family members, not just company machines - these features in the license were negotiated. Naturally it does not mean any of our family members can then sell the said software on ebay as they see fit.

So, in my view, the ones who should be in court here is the company that sold this guy the software in the first place, or the individuals in the company that did it - they broke the license agreements, they are the ones that should cover the cost here.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 05:07:11 PM by kolla »
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline pwermonger

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 175
    • Show only replies by pwermonger
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #32 on: September 14, 2010, 05:16:40 PM »
Quote from: psxphill;579249
You didn't purchase the software, you just thought you did. That isn't anyones fault but your own. It said it inside the box, like all the other software.
 
I thought I bought the plates because they put them in front of me and I paid them money. If I were in a plate shop and that happened then I would own them, in a restaraunt I don't.
 
I only know that because of education. Knowing that shrink wrapped licenses say you can't re-sell the software is another piece of education.
 
Anyone that has read my post can no longer claim that they don't agree with shrink wrapped licenses, because I've told you all about them. Education is great.

Actually, if I'm not mistaken shrink wrap licenses have been thrown out pretty much everywhere they've been contested since you can not be forced to agree to something ex post facto.
 
When I'm in Best Buy I take a box off a shelf, walk to a cash register and pay, then walk form the store with what I purchased in my hand which I now own and law says the company can not further restrict how I dispose of it after that initial sale. Sit down restaurant, I buy my food sitting at the table and am served by a waiter that food which I ordered from the menu. Now, take out food, is more analogous to my software purchase. There, lo and behold, I get my plates and utensils in the bag in my hand to take from the store and again the take out food establishment cant chase me in the street and stop me from selling it to someone on the corner if I wnat to.
 
They dont lose a sale. now, book publishers and record copanies tried to limit used sales with the idea that you bought the book or record and had use of it then were able to 'steal' a sale from them by selling it used to someone who might have bought it new. They didnt succeed. I can venture software companies will not succeed either though they are trying the same things, few learn from the past.
 
Now, in the case of business purchased licenses, there is a different animal, and likely what this court was deciding on. There, no one walked from a store with a box of software, CD and license to use as a physical item, with an expectation of ownership of what they purchased and the right to dispose of it when done with it how they see fit.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 05:27:04 PM by pwermonger »
 

Offline KThunder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 1509
    • Show only replies by KThunder
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #33 on: September 14, 2010, 06:44:47 PM »
Quote from: psxphill;579241
Just because you don't agree, doesn't make it a straw man.
 
The shrink wrapped license says that you can't resell it, you know that the shrink wrapped license on every piece of software says it.
 
If you didn't already know, then I'm telling you now. Every piece of commercial software, says you cannot re-sell it.
 
Now you have no excuse.
 
The major reason why shrink wrapped licenses were not considered valid is because people claimed ignorance. Even going so far as to get a dog to open the package.
 
If you don't want to buy the software that says you can't re-sell it then don't buy it.
 
If you want to take the plates away with you, go to somewhere they give you paper plates.



They can put anything they want into licenses, even stuff they know they can't legally enforce. Even stuff that has legally struck down.

This entire dinner and diner analogy is backwards and irrelavent to this discussion.

A more appropriate one would be a publisher getting paid for every single person who read a particular book, or for every time said book was sold. Sorry you can't look at my book because we would have to pay the publisher an extra amount.

That obviously is nonsense. But publishers, both book and software want to get every penny they conceivably can from their product.

publishers have every right to compensation for their product and that happens at the original sale. they provide a product and support for the product and are fairly compensated.
put it another way. I'm the third owner of my ranger pickup. ford got money only on the original sale. It is the same pickup, they are still the OEM, the same effort both in design and production went into making my truck; but they don't get any more money.

Why because "We the people" said that is fair and that has been the practice for about a century. Software publishers want this all to be different becuase they can track who owns thier software and can charge for more.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 06:46:56 PM by KThunder »
Oh yeah?!?
Well your stupid bit is set,
and its read only!
(my best geek putdown)
 

Offline kolla

Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #34 on: September 14, 2010, 06:53:35 PM »
Most of you seem to not have read the case at hand and are just rambling, why do you bother?
B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC
---
A3000/060CSPPC+CVPPC/128MB + 256MB BigRAM/Deneb USB
A4000/CS060/Mediator4000Di/Voodoo5/128MB
A1200/Blz1260/IndyAGA/192MB
A1200/Blz1260/64MB
A1200/Blz1230III/32MB
A1200/ACA1221
A600/V600v2/Subway USB
A600/Apollo630/32MB
A600/A6095
CD32/SX32/32MB/Plipbox
CD32/TF328
A500/V500v2
A500/MTec520
CDTV
MiSTer, MiST, FleaFPGAs and original Minimig
Peg1, SAM440 and Mac minis with MorphOS
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #35 on: September 14, 2010, 07:00:40 PM »
Quote from: Franko;579296
Cheers Piru... that's cleared that one up... :)


If by "pond" you mean Atlantic, Piru is on the same geographic side as us. If you meant North Sea, then he's certainly on the other side and then some (tucked away behind Norway, Sweden and even more sea)...
int p; // A
 

Offline mdv2000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 169
    • Show only replies by mdv2000
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #36 on: September 14, 2010, 07:02:12 PM »
KThunder makes a very valid point and software vendors are already making it harder to do used sales of software.  Services like Xbox Live, PSN and Steam are all about making a sale to you - give you convience (download) to obtain but also make it where you can't ever "sale" the product used.  All the software I buy via Steam is licensed to me and I can easily install it to my PC, but I can't decide to sell game I've beaten and then transfer the license to someone else.  This way there is no used outlet for my game purchases.

New console games are coming with one-time use only Online codes to stop used copies getting used for multiplayer and online content usage.  Top selling games on Xbox and PS3 all have large online following and this practice for the most part will make used copies scare and unresaleble.

Software is just following the same path the music and movie industry has been down a while now.  

In regards to business purchase - licenses (especially volume buys) are always negotiated upfront and the companies have to comply with what they agree to.
Mike Valverde
---------------------------------
"Only AMIGA makes it possible!"

A2000HD +A2630+ w/8MB+500MB SCSI HD
 + Buddha IDE + 1.3 and 3.1 ROM (WB 3.1)
 

Offline KThunder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 1509
    • Show only replies by KThunder
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #37 on: September 14, 2010, 08:35:47 PM »
Quote from: mdv2000;579335
...
In regards to business purchase - licenses (especially volume buys) are always negotiated upfront and the companies have to comply with what they agree to.


People should comply with what they agree to, however if you study most EULAs you will find proviso's usually to the tune of "unless federal or state law conflicts"

in other words the software company can claim anything they want to and you can agree to it and try to stick to that license but if a federal or state law conflicts you don't necissarily have to. They can claim your firstborn and no second hand sales but laws might make those sections of the agreement void.

microsoft for years had "do not copy" warnings on their discs until they got nailed in court enough for it now the discs say "do not make illegal copies"

there is a big difference. just because you "opened the shrink wrap" or accepted the license DOES NOT mean you have no rights other than what is spelled out in the EULA. Many companies dont what you to know the rights that you do have.

thats were these court cases come in. spelling out the rights you have despite what the EULA states "unless state or federal laws conflict."
« Last Edit: September 14, 2010, 08:38:26 PM by KThunder »
Oh yeah?!?
Well your stupid bit is set,
and its read only!
(my best geek putdown)
 

Offline orb85750

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 1237
    • Show only replies by orb85750
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #38 on: September 14, 2010, 10:22:58 PM »
"Software producers who clearly impose restrictions on buyers and make it clear that buyers are only licensing material rather than buying it outright do have the right to restrict second hand sales of the material, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has said."

That's perfectly fine.  Let's (someone) set up a website containing all such software so that the general public can boycott it.   (And I think it's naive to think that this type of thing will spread to other spaces, such as video games and other relatively low-cost off-the-shelf items.)
 

Offline AmigaEd

  • His Dudeness, El Duderino
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2005
  • Posts: 512
    • Show only replies by AmigaEd
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #39 on: September 15, 2010, 01:18:04 AM »
Quote from: gertsy;579223
Yes, as long as the purchaser does not use the software.


So just how exactley am I supposed to control what the purchaser does with the software? Or is that not really my concern?

Back to the "used car" analogy... If I sell my used car to some person, am I responsible to control how that person uses the car? (Remember I'm talking about the physical items here not the license to use something.)
"Pretty soon they will have numbers tattooed on our foreheads." - Jay Miner 1990

La Familia...
A1K - La Primera Dama -1987
A1K - La Princesa- January 2005
A2K - La Reina - February 2005
A2K - Doomy - March 2005
A500 - El Gran Jugador - April 2005
A1200 - La Hermosa Vista - May 2005
A2KHD - El Duro Grande - May 2005
A600 - Prístino - May 2005
A1200 - El Trueno Grande - July 2005
CDTV - El Misterioso - August 2005
C64 - El Gran Lebows
 

Offline AmigaEd

  • His Dudeness, El Duderino
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2005
  • Posts: 512
    • Show only replies by AmigaEd
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2010, 01:22:35 AM »
Quote from: orb85750;579395

That's perfectly fine.  Let's (someone) set up a website containing all such software so that the general public can boycott it.


I'm guessing that after the first five users (from A.org users and the book burning club) show up, the traffic to the site will pretty much dry up.
"Pretty soon they will have numbers tattooed on our foreheads." - Jay Miner 1990

La Familia...
A1K - La Primera Dama -1987
A1K - La Princesa- January 2005
A2K - La Reina - February 2005
A2K - Doomy - March 2005
A500 - El Gran Jugador - April 2005
A1200 - La Hermosa Vista - May 2005
A2KHD - El Duro Grande - May 2005
A600 - Prístino - May 2005
A1200 - El Trueno Grande - July 2005
CDTV - El Misterioso - August 2005
C64 - El Gran Lebows
 

Offline tone007

Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #41 on: September 15, 2010, 01:23:58 AM »
Make the software download only, and sell it at a 1/10th of the previous cost, and I won't care what license restrictions it comes with.
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline KThunder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 1509
    • Show only replies by KThunder
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #42 on: September 15, 2010, 03:44:21 AM »
Quote from: tone007;579421
Make the software download only, and sell it at a 1/10th of the previous cost, and I won't care what license restrictions it comes with.


Even if it leaves tracking software on your computer, sends information back to the publisher (which could easily be intercepted) or deletes itself from your computer because of some copyright issue the publisher has. (like a recent kindle book did) http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090717/1559425587.shtml

There is all kinds of bad stuff that has happened and will continue to happen because software companies are getting so despotic with their copyrights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_CD_copy_protection_scandal

These publishers and companies are not interested in their customers interests anymore. They are not interested in producing a quality product, only getting something out quickly and patching it later. Many will sell a game or software they know is poor quality.

What if the licensing states that if you plug a flash drive into your computer you will be considered in breach and the software will uninstall itself and send a report to the company? Restrictive? Yes but you could have been trying to copy it right? Would that be ok?

What if the software tracks your online activities to ensure that you arent visiting hacking sites that would allow you to break their drm? is that ok as long as it is in their EULA?
« Last Edit: September 15, 2010, 04:00:05 AM by KThunder »
Oh yeah?!?
Well your stupid bit is set,
and its read only!
(my best geek putdown)
 

Offline AmigaEd

  • His Dudeness, El Duderino
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2005
  • Posts: 512
    • Show only replies by AmigaEd
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #43 on: September 15, 2010, 07:36:10 AM »
Quote from: KThunder;579433

What if the software tracks your online activities to ensure that you arent visiting hacking sites that would allow you to break their drm? is that ok as long as it is in their EULA?


What if the software is monititoring your online or offline activities and taking actions based on your use of a competitors product or website?

Software and the business practices surrounding it, seems no different than any other type of business or product. There are good companies and bad companies, good products and bad products, good customers and bad customers.

Clearly there is some really good software out there. It's clean, effiecient, does exactley what you need and expect it to do. Clearly there is also some just plain crap out there too. It's always been that way and I doubt this will change miuch. Perhaps one thing that has changed is that we (more as software consumers and less as software creators) have become more willing to accept "good enough" vs. "the best" (or best effort).

As for the companies putting software out there, how can we even begin to think we know what lurks in the hearts of the men driving these enterprises of mass production. (maybe that should be "weapons of mass destruction"). As in any industry, there are compaies that will do right by some people and others that will throw you under the bus.

Copyrights, the law and all that goes along with it is by it's very nature a corrundrum (as are many things human). As humans, one minutes we can be Robin Hood and the next we're the Sherriff of Nottingham. Quite often the side that is "right" is defined by the side we happen to be on at the moment. Sure we can try to tack our own "tails" of personal morality or the moralities of our groups on to the copyright donkey's ass but the plain fact is the donkey doesn't want you sticking him in the ass with anything. SO, LEAVE HIM ALONE PLEASE!
"Pretty soon they will have numbers tattooed on our foreheads." - Jay Miner 1990

La Familia...
A1K - La Primera Dama -1987
A1K - La Princesa- January 2005
A2K - La Reina - February 2005
A2K - Doomy - March 2005
A500 - El Gran Jugador - April 2005
A1200 - La Hermosa Vista - May 2005
A2KHD - El Duro Grande - May 2005
A600 - Prístino - May 2005
A1200 - El Trueno Grande - July 2005
CDTV - El Misterioso - August 2005
C64 - El Gran Lebows
 

Offline Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5707
    • Show only replies by Franko
Re: Copyright continued...
« Reply #44 on: September 15, 2010, 11:19:49 AM »
Quote from: Karlos;579334
If by "pond" you mean Atlantic, Piru is on the same geographic side as us. If you meant North Sea, then he's certainly on the other side and then some (tucked away behind Norway, Sweden and even more sea)...


No, I meant across the duck pond that I live in the middle of, I'm the the only one here and speak in a language that no one understands including me !!! :biglaugh:

Only joking... :) my medication hasn't kicked in yet... :crazy: