Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CPU Benchmark  (Read 5931 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeiyaTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2004
  • Posts: 380
    • Show only replies by Seiya
    • http://www.amigademo.tk
CPU Benchmark
« on: August 19, 2010, 06:53:24 PM »
Some tests to compare the various cpu on AmigaOS4 and MorphOS

1)Blender (AmigaOS4 and MorphOS version) to use with the bench attached on the site

2)Lame 3.98 to use with a wav file that you find here:
xoomer.virgilio.it/tuxcam/wave/osaka_theory.rar (you have to make a copy & paste on the browser )
usage : lame file wav file.mp3

3) BladeEnc 0.94 - another mp3 encoder
usage: bladeenc file wav file.mp3

4)Quake software: This test could be depend by 2D vga acceleration .
console:
timedemo demo2
Close console with the same button as soon as timedemo starts

--------------------------


x86 benchmark that could give some interesting info, shoul be done from 500 to 1500 mhz cpu only.

Offline rvo_nl

  • Lifetime Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 860
    • Show only replies by rvo_nl
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2010, 12:19:37 PM »
Why not include Classic Amiga aswell? That would be nice to compare, too. At least Lame and Quake are available for Classic/PPC Amiga's too. Also, in what resolution should that Quake timedemo run? I've had 28.8fps in 320x240 in demo1.
Amiga 1200 (1d4) Kickstart 3.1 (40.68), Elbox Power/Winner tower (450w psu), BlizzardPPC 603e+ @240mhz & 060 @50mhz, 256MB, Bvision, IDE-fix Express, IndivisionAGA, 120GB IDE, cd, dvd, Cocolino, Micronik Keycase, PCMCIA Ethernet, Ratte monitor switcher, Prelude1200, triple boot WB3.1 / OS3.9 / OS4.1, Win95 / MacOS8.1
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2010, 01:40:42 PM »
yeah include the classic PPC amiga so that my Blizzard card can storm into second place in the time sheet. (classic amigas only) just behind a 233Mhz Cyberstorm.

but i wonder can a 233Mhz Cyberstorm/Cybervision can out-do my Blizzard/Bvision in *3D  performance* 38Mhz PCI bus speed but if using OS4.0 expect 43Mhz PCI bus speed.

Bvision memoy clock is now *standard* at 100Mhz.
 

also i don`t need to use a screen mode lower than 800x600.

WORKBENCH *standard * screenmode 1024x768

ALL RTG GAMES *standard* 800x600 if the game support screen mode that high. depending on which game is used some games is fast enough with 1024x768 screen mode.



NOTE: my Blizzard and Bvision card holds a few world records not yet posted in any thread for top-end speed for classic amiga.


NOTE: where it says *standard* does not mean thats its top end speed or the screenmode can`t go any higher,it`s  just a standard i use all the time for testing with no issues.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2010, 04:14:30 PM by delshay »
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2010, 04:08:40 PM »
Quote from: delshay;575991
but i wonder can a 233Mhz Cyberstorm/Cybervision can out-do my Blizzard/Bvision in *3D  performance* 38Mhz PCI bus speed but if using OS4.0 expect 43Mhz PCI bus speed.

I wonder if anyone cares.
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2010, 04:18:13 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576009
I wonder if anyone cares.

A touch harsh, Piru.

On the other hand, as a MorphOS user I'm primarily interested in the benches that were mentioned on more current hardware.

And I don't want to run anything at 320x240.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2010, 04:34:37 PM by Iggy »
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2010, 04:21:42 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576009
I wonder if anyone cares.


given that there is very little posting in this thread i think you maybe right,but there are a few interest via my PM.
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline Iggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 5348
    • Show only replies by Iggy
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2010, 04:39:34 PM »
Quote from: delshay;576011
given that there is very little posting in this thread i think you maybe right,but there are a few interest via my PM.

Well, I guess that's one take on Piru's statement. Personally, I think he focused more on the idea of including Classic hardware in the benches.

And, personally, again I'd love to see some decent AOS4 vs MOS comparison benches.
"Not making any hard and fast rules means that the moderators can use their good judgment in moderation, and we think the results speak for themselves." - Amiga.org, terms of service

"You, got to stem the evil tide, and keep it on the the inside" - Rogers Waters

"God was never on your side" - Lemmy

Amiga! "Our appeal has become more selective"
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2010, 04:43:45 PM »
Quote from: Iggy;576013
Well, I guess that's one take on Piru's statement. Personally, I think he focused more on the idea of including Classic hardware in the benches.

And, personally, again I'd love to see some decent AOS4 vs MOS comparison benches.


i know what he's trying to do,perhaps he`s had to many drugs today.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2010, 08:22:11 PM by delshay »
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline HammerD

Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2010, 04:55:44 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576009
I wonder if anyone cares.


I do, since I still enjoy using my classic amigas.
AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out!
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2010, 05:01:14 PM »
Quote from: HammerD;576019
I do, since I still enjoy using my classic amigas.
There's nothing wrong with that. What I dislike is breaking perfectly working classic HW by pointless overclocking (or attempts of overclocking). Working classic HW is getting rarer all the time. In my view it should be preserved, rather than trying to pimp it up the maximum until it fries.

If you want the ultimate performance (for instance in 3D), there are way better solutions for that these days (emulation, AROS, or other new amigoid systems).
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2010, 05:27:30 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576023
There's nothing wrong with that. What I dislike is breaking perfectly working classic HW by pointless overclocking (or attempts of overclocking). Working classic HW is getting rarer all the time. In my view it should be preserved, rather than trying to pimp it up the maximum until it fries.

If you want the ultimate performance (for instance in 3D), there are way better solutions for that these days (emulation, AROS, or other new amigoid systems).



i agree,but the card can go faster without any overclocking whatsoever,and  iv just tested such a card 300Mhz PPC and a real 68060@75Mhz and it`s performace is not far off my fastest card.

you name the componet that you thing is overclocked and i may give you the part no whats it`s replace with and i can tell you now one or two componets in my set-up is  infact under-clocked and has yet to reach it`s full speed.


classic cards must be protected this is why i have not modify any cards yet,and i did recommend a new type of fan for *all* Blizzard cards regardless if it overclocked or not.

and remenber i can take a Blizzard PPC or Bvision completely apart to the bare board and put it back together and iv already done so.

im able to identify faults on the card because iv being working on Blizzard cards for such a long time,this is why i have the fastest card in the world and yes if it goes faulty i just repair it like my test card.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2010, 05:34:09 PM by delshay »
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline Piru

  • \' union select name,pwd--
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2002
  • Posts: 6946
    • Show only replies by Piru
    • http://www.iki.fi/sintonen/
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2010, 05:33:55 PM »
@delshay

A question: How many A1200, Blizzard PPC and BVisionPPC have you destroyed while working on your projects?
 

Offline HammerD

Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2010, 05:34:14 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576023
There's nothing wrong with that. What I dislike is breaking perfectly working classic HW by pointless overclocking (or attempts of overclocking). Working classic HW is getting rarer all the time. In my view it should be preserved, rather than trying to pimp it up the maximum until it fries.

If you want the ultimate performance (for instance in 3D), there are way better solutions for that these days (emulation, AROS, or other new amigoid systems).


I'm not really interested personally in 3D, but I did overclock one of my Cyberstorms.  Actually I didn't really overclock it, I just had the CPU replaced with a faster 604e.

I have enough of my own stock of classic hw that I should be ok to tinker with one of it.  If it was my only cyberstorm ppc board then I would have been more cautious.

BTW, I've got my 366MHz cyberstorm ppc to a be relatively stable by hand-picking simms.  I have it fully populated with 128MB ram now.  Your WhichAmiga program identifies the ppc as a 366Mhz 604e. :)
AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out!
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2010, 05:39:59 PM »
old poor photo of OS4.0 and there has been another speed increase there is also a work in progress to another CPU but i don`t know if it will ever be completed

http://www.amiga.org/gallery/index.php?n=3273
-------------
power is nothing without control
 

Offline delshay

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2004
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show only replies by delshay
Re: CPU Benchmark
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2010, 05:50:52 PM »
Quote from: Piru;576036
@delshay

A question: How many A1200, Blizzard PPC and BVisionPPC have you destroyed while working on your projects?


none.

iv being buying already none working cards,testing each componet and then putting it back together. if you don`t belive me i can point you to my old thead where iv being asking for none working cards.

iv infact gain a few cards in this way,iv also found something which nobody knows excepet Phase 5 eniginners untill today in this thread.

now here something none of you know.

you can change the PCI bus speed from the 68k processor to the PPC processor.
-------------
power is nothing without control