Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga vs PC  (Read 67990 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #149 on: August 13, 2010, 07:32:18 PM »
Quote from: runequester;574657
I've been meaning to get a wireless PCMCIA card for my 1200, and I figured Lynx would be the best way to go :)

Still a bit daunted at the task of setting up TCP/IP and all that

I seem to recall Patrik and Fx put up a no-nonsense guide for configuring AmiTCP somewhere, but I can't seem to find it atm.

Anyway, the trick is to tell it you have an A2065 network card when installing it. After installation, edit the file AmiTCP:db/interfaces file and change the line that reads "a2065.device" to "cnet.device" (assuming that's what you are using for your NIC).

Job done.
int p; // A
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show only replies by the_leander
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #150 on: August 13, 2010, 07:34:16 PM »
Quote from: Franko;574664
the_leander... FOR GAWDS SAKE, please stop quoting quote upon quote and then only answering with one or two word reply's... :)


No.

Breaking up a post is realistically the only way to clarify what specifically you're replying to whilst trimming out the bits you're not responding to is best practice. The other alternative is to manually paste in bits with quotation marks, which whilst would probably suffice, isn't as clear as the system offered by this forum or top posting.

If you don't like this style of posting, I suggest you take it up on Usenet, where you are sure to find a warm reception to the idea of top posting especially :p

Very warm, in fact...
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1150
    • Show only replies by Thorham
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #151 on: August 13, 2010, 07:36:06 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;574658
So mature!
I always write peecee on Amiga fora, what's the big deal?
Quote from: the_leander;574658
We weren't.

But... You'd actually have to bother to read what was being discussed to understand that rather than skim though like you just did.
Perhaps you're right, but you still missed the point, namely that discussions such as this aren't very useful, because comparing the Amiga to the peecee isn't very useful because of the history of both machines (second paragraph of my post).

On EAB there was something similarly pointless in the form of Amiga vs Atari ST. Great. And on a certain MSX forum there are people who will argue that MSX is better than Amiga/peecee/St/whatever. How mature is that?
 

Offline Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5707
    • Show only replies by Franko
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #152 on: August 13, 2010, 07:45:55 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;574666
No.

Breaking up a post is realistically the only way to clarify what specifically you're replying to


Is it

Quote
whilst trimming out the bits you're not responding to is best practice.


A matter of opinion

Quote
The other alternative is to manually paste in bits with quotation marks


must be another way, surely

Quote
which whilst would probably suffice, isn't as clear as the system offered by this forum or top posting.


maybe

Quote
If you don't like this style of posting,


I don't

Quote
I suggest you take it up on Usenet,


wrong suggestion

Quote
where you are sure to find a warm reception to the idea of top posting especially :p


What's 'top posting' !!! :D
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show only replies by the_leander
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #153 on: August 13, 2010, 07:48:47 PM »
Quote from: Thorham;574667
I always write peecee on Amiga fora, what's the big deal?


It's not a big deal (to me), it just lessens the strength of any following argument.

Quote from: Thorham;574667
discussions such as this aren't very useful


On the whole I would agree. However, a little nostalgia trip, comparing the relative strengths and weaknesses between various systems of a given era on what is essentially a hobbyist board can be interesting, so long as it doesn't devolve into flames.

Which with the exception of a couple in this thread, it hasn't.

Quote from: Thorham;574667
How mature is that?


All depends on how you handle it.
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline the_leander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 3448
    • Show only replies by the_leander
    • http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #154 on: August 13, 2010, 07:55:51 PM »
Quote from: Franko;574668
Is it


Yes.

Quote from: Franko;574668

I don't


Suck it up.

Quote from: Franko;574668

wrong suggestion


Followed up with...

Quote from: Franko;574668

What's 'top posting' !!! :D


Now see,  if you'd followed my suggestion, you'd have your answer. Failing that JFGI.
Blessed Be,
Alan Fisher - the_leander

[SIGPIC]http://www.extropia.co.uk/theleander/[/SIGPIC]
 

Offline halvliter'n

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 174
    • Show only replies by halvliter'n
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #155 on: August 13, 2010, 08:04:34 PM »
@the leander

You signed up in 2002? You're just a dummy doll. LOL!
Commodore64+TheFinalCartridgeIII+CBM1541, A500+512slow+1084, A1200+BPPC060+Bvision+AOS3.9
 

Offline Franko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5707
    • Show only replies by Franko
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #156 on: August 13, 2010, 08:16:21 PM »
Quote from: the_leander;574670
Now see,  if you'd followed my suggestion, you'd have your answer. Failing that JFGI.


First of all, you might have told me what JFGI stands for (had to google it to find out) :)

Once I found out what that meant I then googled Top Posting and the answer was...

Definitions of Top posting on the Web:

When a message is replied to in e-mail, Internet forums, or Usenet, the original can often be included, or "quoted", in a variety of different posting styles.


http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:Top+posting&sa=X&ei=UZdlTOG-MsfQ4wbu6YzLCg&ved=0CBcQkAE

So by this definition, then using all those quotes makes you a Top Poster... :)

Glad that's cleared up now... :biglaugh:
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #157 on: August 13, 2010, 08:26:12 PM »
No, _this_ is an example of "top posting".

Quote from: Franko;574674
First of all, you might have told me what JFGI stands for (had to google it to find out) :)

Once I found out what that meant I then googled Top Posting and the answer was...

Definitions of Top posting on the Web:

When a message is replied to in e-mail, Internet forums, or Usenet, the original can often be included, or "quoted", in a variety of different posting styles.


http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&defl=en&q=define:Top+posting&sa=X&ei=UZdlTOG-MsfQ4wbu6YzLCg&ved=0CBcQkAE

So by this definition, then using all those quotes makes you a Top Poster... :)

Glad that's cleared up now... :biglaugh:

(Whereas _this_ is bottom posting)
int p; // A
 

Offline Karlos

  • Sockologist
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 16879
  • Country: gb
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • Show only replies by Karlos
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #158 on: August 13, 2010, 08:29:17 PM »
^ what the_leander uses is interleaved or inline posting. It's also what I use, unless I'm replying to something very short.

Quoting a long message then shoving an equally long reply above or below it is just tl;dr fodder.
int p; // A
 

Offline Arkhan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 490
    • Show only replies by Arkhan
    • http://www.aetherbyte.com
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #159 on: August 13, 2010, 09:30:52 PM »
Quote from: Thorham;574667
I always write peecee on Amiga fora, what's the big deal?
Typing more letters to get the same phonetic thing out makes you look dumb.  It'd be like me typing some scholarly reply and typing "uhmeeguh" in it. The whole post is reduced to: Dumb.

Quote
And on a certain MSX forum there are people who will argue that MSX is better than Amiga/peecee/St/whatever. How mature is that?

Are you talking about MSX.org?  That forums so n00b about the MSX its not even funny lol.  their infighting drama is the stuff legends are made of.

On a side note, I like the MSX more for music making.  having 17 channels of chip-noises is pretty neat, and I like that more than sampling.

and for games usually... but only because they have that distinct (obvious) Japanese style that has been attempted by the whiteman, but never duplicated.  ... and metal gear 2... :D  talk about awesome.

Its an opinion, not a fact.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2010, 09:43:23 PM by Arkhan »
I am a negative, rude, prick.  


"Aetherbyte: My fledgling game studio!":  << Probably not coming to an Amiga near you because you all suck! :roflmao:
 

Offline Thorham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 1150
    • Show only replies by Thorham
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #160 on: August 14, 2010, 02:02:30 AM »
Quote from: Arkhan;574681
Typing more letters to get the same phonetic thing out makes you look dumb.
You're not serious, right? Oh man... :(

First someone who thinks it immature to write 'peecee', now someone who thinks it dumb because he doesn't understand :lol:

Here's the explanation: 'peecee' is similar to 'M$', 'Winblows XPee' and 'Linsux'. Get it? I sure hope so...
 

Offline tone007

Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #161 on: August 14, 2010, 02:12:40 AM »
Quote from: Thorham;574706
Here's the explanation: 'peecee' is similar to 'M$', 'Winblows XPee' and 'Linsux'. Get it? I sure hope so...


Yeah, yeah.  Any 10 year old would get it.  Leave it for the 10 year olds.
3 Commodore file cabinets, 2 Commodore USB turntables, 1 AmigaWorld beer mug
Alienware M14x i7 laptop running AmigaForever
 

Offline Arkhan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 490
    • Show only replies by Arkhan
    • http://www.aetherbyte.com
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #162 on: August 14, 2010, 02:43:22 AM »
Quote from: Thorham;574706
You're not serious, right? Oh man... :(

First someone who thinks it immature to write 'peecee', now someone who thinks it dumb because he doesn't understand :lol:

Here's the explanation: 'peecee' is similar to 'M$', 'Winblows XPee' and 'Linsux'. Get it? I sure hope so...


Except for this simple break down

M$: $ = money, fight the power.
Winblows XPee:  Blows is an insult.
Linsux: Sux is an insult.

winblows and linsux aren't phonetic clones of the original.

PeeCee is just you trying to be cool.  I think you're done.

I mean it's almost funny with the Pee, but whats so insulting about a Cee.  What is a Cee.

Flid.
I am a negative, rude, prick.  


"Aetherbyte: My fledgling game studio!":  << Probably not coming to an Amiga near you because you all suck! :roflmao:
 

Offline Arkhan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 490
    • Show only replies by Arkhan
    • http://www.aetherbyte.com
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #163 on: August 14, 2010, 02:47:49 AM »
I am a negative, rude, prick.  


"Aetherbyte: My fledgling game studio!":  << Probably not coming to an Amiga near you because you all suck! :roflmao:
 

Offline halvliter'n

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 174
    • Show only replies by halvliter'n
Re: Amiga vs PC
« Reply #164 from previous page: August 14, 2010, 03:08:03 AM »
Amiga Rules!!!1
Commodore64+TheFinalCartridgeIII+CBM1541, A500+512slow+1084, A1200+BPPC060+Bvision+AOS3.9