Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website  (Read 13695 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GGS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by GGS
    • http://www.ggsdata.se
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #89 from previous page: November 30, 2003, 06:47:04 PM »
Hi again !

> No, i dont think they will go bancrupt, but it looks as if it is a common belief and i was merely hinting at other possible events.

Ok. Any more possibilities ?

> They both should be gaining from it since they dont agree, and it would make atleast one problem go away.

So you think the contract is a problem then ?

What is the problem ?

 

Offline Step

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 202
    • Show only replies by Step
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2003, 08:27:13 PM »
@GGS

More possibilities ?, they could start getting nice revenues from A1/OS4/DE, find new investors, new partners etc.
I dont know if the contract is a problem, have not seen it. Obviously A problem is that they dont agree.

.................................
 :sealed: Think, before :ranting:
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #91 on: November 30, 2003, 08:59:54 PM »
by Step on 2003/11/30 15:27:13

Quote
More possibilities ?, they could start getting nice revenues from A1/OS4/DE, find new investors, new partners etc.


Unlikely to happen, if it was, it would have happened years ago.  Problem now is that everyone and his mother knows how bad off Amiga Inc financially with judgements against (yes, that is public record which is on Amiga Inc's (and McEwen's) credit report) that has to be satisfied first.  Would you  invest in a company with a failed idea, no offices, has judgements still oustanding, and is currently being sued by a company that has an existing contact with them?  Odds are, you would grab your wallet and go screaming out of McDonalds since the would be the only real place to meet with McEwen.   The only person stupid enough (sorry, has to be said) to pay any type of money is BBRV, and McEwen knows it yet he rather loose his house to the bank then deal with BBRV.

Selling enough A1s to cover that type of debt?  Yeah, right.   There still a matter of sCAM to settle with and then there is all those free OS4 via DEad PartyPack owners that has to be satisified.  Seeing Elvis step out of a flying saucer is more likely to happen then Amiga Inc surviving.  But anything is possible, I guess, just highly unlikely. ;)

Dammy
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline NihilVor

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 15
    • Show only replies by NihilVor
    • http://www.digitalfreezer.net/nihilvor
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #92 on: November 30, 2003, 09:06:49 PM »
GGS:

I've been reading the posts with a grin.  You seem to buy the standard bbvr line that Amiga is not competition.   That's spin;  all companies do it (and you'll find a lot of it on Amiga's site).  

However, Genesi sees its userbase coming, for now, from Amiga and ex-Amiga users.  There is no doubt that they are trying to get the new version of their OS out before 4.0, that they've been courting Amiga developers, that they complain whenever something is released for Amiga and not Morphos.  The effect (and business objective)is to create some similitude .

Bbvr's activly attempts to bankrupt Amiga;  I don't think there is any real ambiguity there.  Irregardless of some of Amiga's miscalculations with DE(ad), I see those who cheer for another bankruptcy as being rather puerile.
 

Offline GregS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2003
  • Posts: 14
    • Show only replies by GregS
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #93 on: November 30, 2003, 09:36:41 PM »
Quote
mantisspider on 2003/11/30 0:41:02

Whats so good about DE? From all the hype and the posts in the DE forums when they were live a few yrs ago nothing ever happened.
IIRC the only software made in the end was a little games pack available on a smart card.

is it supposed to be the case of stand back XP amigaDE is here? what benefits would merging amigaDE and OS4 have? please enlighten me as I am pretty ignorant and after being shown amigaDE all those years ago I could smell that nothing would happen so I didnt bother looking again.


There are a number of things that need to separated out. The Taos engine is just a typical stripped down embeded OS - it has some interesting features but nothing to set the world on fire. It works smoothly even ontop of Windows (leaves the underlying OS in shame to tell the truth).

Its main virtue of course is that it and its apps are compiled to a virtual CPU and translated very smartly to the CPU you are actually running it on (200k translation base). It can also be hosted ontop of another OS or run by itself.

AmigaDE as it presently stands is only a specification for applications compiled for and running on Toas, there are a few specifically Amiga bits involved but nothing to set you on fire. At the moment it is just biased towards the PDA and small things market which Toas small footprint is well suited and its CPU agnosticism suits.

For a while Taos has been dragging its feet in making a CPU translator for the PPC. Apple is not either big enough and Toas has no real role there. So I suggest that the recent interest form Pegasos might owe itself not to anything that Amiga has done, but perhaps because Toas is finally getting the PPC translator working properly - I think the MicroA1 may have been very persuasive as well as sales of the A1 which have recently spiked a little.

It could also be the case that the release of OS4 may have Toas running ontop of it, the timing seems right but no promises have been given that I know about.

For the Amiga community the fact that most of the OS has been rewritten in vanilla C is very important, because then recompiling into Toas for OS5 is relatively easy.

Now when OS5 happens then Toas changes quite radically. Instead of being a bare bones "embedded OS" like all the others, Toas as AmigaDE 5 is now a fully fledged OS with still a small footprint.

Moreover, I strongly suspect, it will be also avialable as a 64bit package and the filesystem will be unrecogniziable.

OK all this is just the jigsaw pieces and how they fit - what are the benefits.

Anything compiled for the Toas engine is portable by nature. Moreover, because it is a software abstraction layer between the OS and the CPU all such software is potentially permanent regardless of future hardware changes. Multi-processing, etc is all inbuilt, etc.

Toas has a number of standard compilers. There is a form of assembler (VP which even I can use), C and C++. Most interesting is SHEEP the future replacement of AREXX which interfaces to AREXX ports (and other scripting ports) seems as simple to use as AREXX and can be compiled into VP code and compiled as tools (without I believe importing vast parts of the interpreter into its compile).

There are some inherent benefits in this step.

Basically the OS4 things and AmigaDE is a lock step strategy (previously I think the idea was to move directly to AmigaDE without either a PPC board or an in between AmigaOS). Now the logic seems to be to supply the existing Amiga community with a much revised OS and a board to run it on, in the process of moving towards AmigaDE/OS5.

It is I think really quite elegant - rewriting the Amiga in vanilla C, developing the OS in a couple of steps (4.1 and 4.2) means the transition to OS5 is really half made.

My personal belief is that Amiga as we know it (its apps) will become a form of legacy ware running within a familiar but radically changed new Amiga OS where apps will be compiled into Toas tools (very handy little objects - each with its own interface and each part automatically becomes a shared library and these are tiny!!).

However, the main benefit will be that Amiga will become the first full OS that is CPU independant, capable of being hoisted or booting whatever machine you happen to have, small enough for PDAs and whatever else can hold a few megabytes of ROM.

For users its means that a piece of software can potentially always run even whent he OS changes beyond recognition and whatever hardware is there. For developers it means compiling once and having their software everywhere (I would not be surprised if some bigger developers wrap the whole thing up with their software.

Greg Schofield


 

Offline AmigaMac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 560
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by AmigaMac
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #94 on: November 30, 2003, 09:44:54 PM »
I read most of the MONO/dotNET posts, so here is my 2 cents;

Quote
It could go in its own direction, but that would be counter-productive unless its adoption starts to rival that of the Microsoft original.

The Ximian connection comes from the fact that they were instrumental in starting the MONO project, long before Novell entered they picture.


Toying with MONO (or dotGNU as it will be known) is playing a very dangerous game.  Microsoft has shown time and time again that they don't mind breaking compatibility with sidekick standards (DOS, J++, .doc, etc...), and this will certainly be the case with MONO.

Quote
The idea behind such technologies is to make them hardware agnostic.


It would be in the best interest to stick with Java for web services since Sun Microsystems doesn't mind others to join in on the effort.  Why mess with something that will always be one step behind the mothership?
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Hammer
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #95 on: November 30, 2003, 10:04:17 PM »
Quote

AmigaMac wrote:
I read most of the MONO/dotNET posts, so here is my 2 cents;

Quote
It could go in its own direction, but that would be counter-productive unless its adoption starts to rival that of the Microsoft original.

The Ximian connection comes from the fact that they were instrumental in starting the MONO project, long before Novell entered they picture.


Toying with MONO (or dotGNU as it will be known) is playing a very dangerous game.  Microsoft has shown time and time again that they don't mind breaking compatibility with sidekick standards (DOS, J++, .doc, etc...), and this will certainly be the case with MONO.

Quote
The idea behind such technologies is to make them hardware agnostic.


It would be in the best interest to stick with Java for web services since Sun Microsystems doesn't mind others to join in on the effort.  Why mess with something that will always be one step behind the mothership?

It wouldn’t stop open source camp from having dotNET compatible ecosystem in open source OSes e.g. Linux.

SUN’s JAVA technology usually supports a single programming language i.e. JAVA. While MONO/dotNET supports multiple programming languages.   It gives the application programmers the freedom to chose their favourite programming language without being tied down to just JAVA.
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline GGS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by GGS
    • http://www.ggsdata.se
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #96 on: November 30, 2003, 10:09:32 PM »
Hi NihilVor

> I've been reading the posts with a grin.

Ok, thank you !

> You seem to buy the standard bbvr line that Amiga is not competition.

How do you know what I buy ? :-) I know that Genesi and Amiga are competitior, why shouldn't I know.

However thats no reason for not having a businessrelation... or ?

Who comes first with their os, I do not think plays any bigger role in the long run. I also know that many users, for now, of course is Amiga and ex Amiga users.

And some questions to you also as you make some statements;

1; Who is the Amiga developers that Genesi have tried to bring to court ?

2; Which are the attempt that bbrv have done for trying bancrupting Amiga ?

Cheers
 

Offline JoannaK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 757
    • Show only replies by JoannaK
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #97 on: November 30, 2003, 10:24:39 PM »
GGS: Being neutral ain't easy.  :roll:
 

Offline Hammer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 1996
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Hammer
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #98 on: November 30, 2003, 10:26:37 PM »
Quote
Indeed, looking to adopt MONO would be a far more adventurous move. The only drawback I see with MONO is that it is basically an open-source "copy" of .NET, which mean the direction is dictated by Microsoft.

Linux X86 <> Linux PPC <> Linux (what ever the next CPU of the day) re-compiling applications would be less of an issue with MONO/dotGNU/dotNET ecosystem.

Note that it doesn’t stop the open source groups to borrow some concepts from MS’s dotNET framework. The compatibility (to a certain degree) with MS’s dotNET is just the added bonus.  
Amiga 1200 PiStorm32-Emu68-RPI 4B 4GB.
Ryzen 9 7900X, DDR5-6000 64 GB, RTX 4080 16 GB PC.
 

Offline Step

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 202
    • Show only replies by Step
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #99 on: November 30, 2003, 10:31:18 PM »
@GGS

He wrote courting, as in "uppvakta" or "smöra".
Sorry about the swedish.

.................................
 :sealed: Think, before :ranting:
 

Offline AmigaMac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 560
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by AmigaMac
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #100 on: November 30, 2003, 10:33:33 PM »
Quote
It wouldn’t stop open source camp from having dotNET compatible ecosystem in open source OSes e.g. Linux.


Unfortunately that wont be the saving grace if incompatibilities arise via web services on the internet.  This will become issue as it already has been an issue with IE versus Netscape... get my drift?

Quote

SUN’s JAVA technology usually supports a single programming language i.e. JAVA. While MONO/dotNET supports multiple programming languages. It gives the application programmers the freedom to chose their favourite programming language without being tied down to just JAVA.


That's not the angle I'm hitting at and yeah I know about the multiple language support, which is a great concept on its own.  But with Microsoft wanting to leverage its monopoly with Windows and finally overtake the web with dotNET, this multiple language support might be an oversight as far as the other guys are concerned.  My thoughts on Java are really with the idea that Sun is willing to let others adopt that strategy into their own, and that's a better approach then trying to get dotGNU to mimic dotNET without error.

I'm not against the MONO project since that at least provides a safety net if Java doesn't succeed.

 

Offline GGS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by GGS
    • http://www.ggsdata.se
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #101 on: November 30, 2003, 10:33:51 PM »
Joanna;

So you have choosed side then :-)
 

Offline GGS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by GGS
    • http://www.ggsdata.se
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #102 on: November 30, 2003, 10:38:47 PM »
#
He wrote courting, as in "uppvakta" or "smöra".
Sorry about the swedish.

Ok, thank you for correcting, I misunderstood then.

But for call upon then, if that was the meaning, is that something wrong ?



 

Offline GGS

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 58
    • Show only replies by GGS
    • http://www.ggsdata.se
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #103 on: November 30, 2003, 10:56:12 PM »
Hi again Step

Ok, thats real good to look for new investors new partners for A1/OS4/DE and revenous..., lets start...

But, and please remember what I now write is not meant for you, so please dont take it that way.

And now here is something to discuss.

You did suggest that the contract should be nullified, and I asked who should gain from this and if the contract in itself is a problem, which if this was the case, considering nullify it perhaps should be something to think of.

The real answer is probably that nobody should gain anything from nullify, and neither the products A1 or OS4 or DE should. Considering nullify is just to say... we arent interrested and we are not interrested in ourselfs either.

The only thing that could be of any benefit would be if try getting something being made.

For going even further, I would like to say its Amiga Inc that dont care. And by doing this they also show that they dont care of either A1 or OS4 or DE, because they as it seems just say, lets the court decide, we dont care. If they did care,  they instead should have sayed something like... ok we have this damm contract, which could be seen as a possible businesopportunity, what can we do with it, the other part want something, can we sit down and see if we can come forward to something which we can gain from.

Can we get something out from this that should be a benefit for us and also for OS4 or A1 or DE. And thats exactly what bbrv seems to try to do, out from his point of view.

As what is common with contracts is that it is at least two parts that signs, and normally also that all involved should gain something.

I know and understand that things might change by time goes by, but that doesn't change that it always can be new possibilities, by looking into things and see how we can change and get something out from the new conditions.

And finally, in what way do Amiga Inc show that they are interrested in A1, OS4 or DE in any other way ? I haven't seen them doing anything at all.

All the best and Take care !
 

Offline JoannaK

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2002
  • Posts: 757
    • Show only replies by JoannaK
Re: AmigaDE for Pegasos PPC website
« Reply #104 on: November 30, 2003, 11:03:32 PM »
GGS: well. actually.. It was pointed to me bit over a year ago by some die-hard red trolls... My comments towards Ainc was too much for them  so they concluded I must be some 'Blue troll' ..  :-P