PPC WinUAE

[mantisspider]

I just downloaded WinUAE 0.8.22, Release 9 but cant see any options to get it over 68040.
Is there a way for UAE to emulate 68060 or PPC amiga?

Whats the fastest that anyone has gotten an Amiga Emulator on the PC?

[bloodline]

mantisspider wrote:
I just downloaded WinUAE 0.8.22, Release 9 but cant see any options to get it over 68040.
Is there a way for UAE to emulate 68060 or PPC amiga?

Whats the fastest that anyone has gotten an Amiga Emulator on the PC?

the 060 is, from a user point of view,  just a fast 040... no PPC emulation has been made yet.

My 3 Ghz machine gets 928.47 MIPS in WinUAE with the JIT on.

[HotRod]

That you can emulate a faster hardware doesn't mean that the emulation will be faster. So there's no point in emulating a 060 since all programs are available for a 040/020 as well. It won't be faster because a real 060 is faster than a real 040.

[Karlos]

bloodline wrote:
My 3 Ghz machine gets 928.47 MIPS in WinUAE with the JIT on.

Is that all? My mates AthlonXP2800 (2.6GHz IIRC) got about 1200 or so :-?

[bloodline]

Karlos wrote:

bloodline wrote:
My 3 Ghz machine gets 928.47 MIPS in WinUAE with the JIT on.

Is that all? My mates AthlonXP2800 (2.6GHz IIRC) got about 1200 or so :-?

The AthlonXP is superior to the Penium4 :-)

[KennyR]

My 3 Ghz machine gets 928.47 MIPS in WinUAE with the JIT on.

A useless figure. All you're testing is the speed of your memory bus, not the CPU, since JIT caches the instructions that are interated again and again in the test.

[Karlos]

KennyR wrote:

My 3 Ghz machine gets 928.47 MIPS in WinUAE with the JIT on.

A useless figure. All you're testing is the speed of your memory bus, not the CPU, since JIT caches the instructions that are interated again and again in the test.

As opposed to a real 68040+ processor with a decent instruction cache which does what, exactly?

Also, the emulated instructions still do the same job as the they would on a real 68K so it is naive to say it is simply a memory bus test. A memory bus test would consist of endless x86 mov commands. The transcripted code (on x86) is nothing like that.

[amigamad]

Is that all? My mates AthlonXP2800 (2.6GHz IIRC) got about 1200 or so

I bet he only has a pentium 4 machine athlons are much better. :-)

[bloodline]

amigamad wrote:

Is that all? My mates AthlonXP2800 (2.6GHz IIRC) got about 1200 or so

I bet he only has a pentium 4 machine athlons are much better. :-)

As much as I love my P4, I agree the Athlons are much better. I only got the P4 because I got a good deal on it :-)

[lorddef]

You people DO NOT know what you are talking about!

The A2000 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER is much SUPERIOR to a mere pentium 4 running uae.

 :-D

[that_punk_guy]

ARGH!

[restore2003]

Oh no! not again!  :-(

[Animagic]

lorddef wrote:
You people DO NOT know what you are talking about!

The A2000 PROFESSIONAL COMPUTER is much SUPERIOR to a mere pentium 4 running uae.

 :-D

Do you have any connection with doomy?
relatives maybe?

 :-D

[Karlos]

@Animagic

Oooooh, that's getting personal :roflmao:

@Lorddef - easy man, back off, he didn't mean it...

:-D

[lorddef]

 :-P