[color=cc00ff][Lurking Device De-activated][/color]
I want to make something abundantly clear. I AM AN EXTREMELY FRUSTRATED AMIGA USER!!!.
The questions I've asked come from a sincere desire to find answers. If they appear insulting, that really wasn't my intent (no pun intended). If they appear political... Well, they are! At this stage of the game, I don't think very many substantive questions directed at Amiga Inc. can be asked with out some politics. Believe me; I really want the Amiga platform to has a future beyond being just another retro-platform. But it looks like that's precisely what the future holds for the Amiga platform...
I fear it is already the Amiga's present?
Anyway, here are my questions/concerns.
Is Amiga Inc.’s goal to either hold hostage or cripple itself and its partners??? I'm serious and sincere here. I honestly believe this is a valid question given Amiga Inc.'s track record. While I don’t expect an answer, I do feel that Mr. McEwen should know this. I was once an Amiga Inc. supporter and had great hopes for Amiga Inc. Now I wonder if killing “The Amiga” wasn’t what Amino Inc., Amiga Corp., Itech LLC, KMOS Inc. and now Amiga Inc. intended from the start.
What has happened to AmigaDE??? And no, I don't mean the toy that is AmigaAnywhere. No, I'm not being insulting. I'm stating a fact. AmigaAnywhere is a toy for playing games on cell phones, PDAs, and/or Microsoft Windows. Which in and of itself is not necessarily a bad thing. What I want to know is what happened to the concept of the "Amiga Digital Environment" or "Amiga Operating Environment"?
Relating to the above, if all that's left of AmigaDE is AmigaAnywhere, of what value is AmigaAnywhere anyway? After all, Java and .Net/Mono are far more wide spread and accessible for both users and developers at this point.
No AmigaAnywhere player for the AmigaOS certainly intimates that Amiga Inc. has little or no confidence in the AmigaOS. This is further born out by Amiga Inc.'s statement on the AmigaOS 4 page on the Amiga Inc. web site statig, "Amiga, Inc. does not distribute or support AmigaOS 4.0.". Is it actually the case that Amiga Inc. has little or no confidence in Amiga OS 4?
This further begs the question, if Amiga Inc. has little or no confidence in the AmigaOS (4 or greater), why haven’t they simply divested or quashed the AmigaOS?
If "Amiga, Inc. does not distribute or support AmigaOS 4.0.", then how come Amiga Inc. gets to determine who can obtain a hardware license? Why is it not up to Hyperion Entertainment VOF? After all, Hyperion Entertainment VOF seems to be the last active member in the AmigaONE partnership.
Are Amiga Inc. and Hyperion Entertainment VOF still friends and partners? Or are you both merely antagonists, bound by a contract that either would like to see the other breech?
What role (if any) does Eyetech Group Ltd currently play in the AmigaONE partnership?
What role does Amiga Inc. currently play (other than granting hardware licenses) in the AmigaONE partnership?
If Amiga Inc. has little or no confidence in the AmigaOS, could Hyperion Entertainment VOF renegotiate their license/contract to obtain the full rights to the AmigaOS?
If Amiga Inc. does actually have confidence in the AmigaOS, what part will it play in Amiga Inc.’s future?
If Amiga Inc. does actually have confidence in the AmigaOS, do you/they see the AmigaOS as a viable embedded OS?
If Amiga Inc. does actually have confidence in the AmigaOS, do you/they see the AmigaOS evolving beyond the desktop at all (i.e. NOS, Cluster OS)?
I'm sure there are a couple I'm forgetting. But I already have thirteen listed (whoops, make that fourteen). I guess that's enough.
Anyway... Time to return to the shadows.
[color=cc00ff][Lurking Device Re-activated][/color]