You are the one correcting yourself
Yes, yes I did, because I didn't consider booting up with a comprimised OS.
and you're the one who is baised
There's that word again. You truly do not know what that word means. I've stated my position, but I'll be clearer for the headstickers among us:
I do not give a rats ass what platform I use so long as it runs the software I need in an acceptable fashion. Towards this end I could use an SGI workstation, a Sun workstation, an IBM workstation, a Mac, or a PC running any of the BSDs, Linux or even Windows. It makes no difference to me so long as it's stable and reasonably fast.
How is the above bias? Oh yes, that's right, it's bias because I don't agree with your unsubstantiated nonsense, that's how.
exaggerating minor differences
Those same minor differences you absolutely lambasted the PC for. Either way the point remains, if you write software that uses functions specific to the 68000, there is an ever increasing risk of them not working at all with each successive model in that series unless you have software emulation to paper over the cracks - something you claimed (repeatedly I might add) was not necessary at all.
and dare speak of "objectivity."
I do so dare. I'm not the one making claims that cannot be backed up, further I'm willing to be corrected when I mess up. Anything less is a clear sign of a fanatic (or a retard, much the same tbh).
So, where are the figures to back up your claims? What's that? You don't have any? Well that's a shocker!
You have first BE OBJECTIVE before you can accuse others
I am. The difference is that I, along with most of the rest of the English speaking world have a very different understanding of what that word means. To you it seems to mean "you are objective and unbiased only if you agree with me, no matter how far off the ball I am".
hyprocrite.
Given your p-poor understanding of the words objective and bias, I'm not that worried about you calling me other names.