Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: (RFD) Amiga.org's future  (Read 31222 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pVC

Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #104 on: May 02, 2009, 10:38:08 AM »
Quote

Methuselas wrote:

I'm probably going to get slammed here, but who gives a sh!t about the people who are *STILL* using their Amigas for the internet, on antiquated browsers?


Amigan or ex-amigan, if anyone, should be able to understand other peoples will to use their own systems and just not looking their own belly. I just wonder these kind of opinions here... I bet you all have been in the situation with Amiga that other platform users have said similarly to you in some point.

Quote

Fact of the matter is, the internet left the Amiga (sans MorphOS and OS4) behind in the dust and b!tching and whining about it isn't going to solve anything. What browsers are out there for 68K are too slow and undeveloped, so it's not their fault they don't have adequate, browsing software.


68k browsers might have a lots of flaws, but I can't accept when they're called slow. I use them still, because they're so darn fast compared to more modern browsers in use.

IBrowse just flies on my Pegasos (G3/600) compared to OWB on same hardware, or compared to Firefox or Opera on my Mac Mini or PC. That's why I still use it. I don't like the overhead on modern browsers even with costs in compatibility.


Quote
In reality, it is. They're using antiquated hardware that just isn't suited for daily web browsing anymore. Sure, there are sites that keep to the old formats, but this is *YOUR* site and *YOU* warrant and updating of it. Yes, the donations come in to support the site. Yes, there's lots of genuine and friendly people on here, but times are changing and the first sign of ignorance is refusal to change.


:) I've been hearing this since 1993 ;) Where to draw the line then, seems like to be very personal question, which most of people decide themselves.


Quote
I can understand how people want to use their Amigas to browse and do daily activities. I wish I had a motherboard formerly known as an "Amiga One" or a Pegasos, but I don't.


Sounds you gave one answer to yourself why you can't understand ;)

Quote
They're expensive. PCs, are not.

Well.. Pegasos was never that expensive. I got my complete setup for 300e 5 years ago and new complete Pegasos2 systems were sold at 600e.

Generally talking that isn't that expensive in my opinion. Macs cost more, original Amigas cost way more, brand PCs cost more...

But of course there's nowadays powerful enough PCs for free too. I've got couple of 2.8GHz complete PC setups for free. But that's just because of insane upgrading cycles nowadays and shows how the PC keeps its price ;)

Quote
The "Zealots", as you called them, can complain all they want about not being able to browse on their Amigas, but that's their own fault. They can't use the excuse of not being able to afford a PC, 'cos netbooks are dirt cheap. They don't want to get one, 'cos they don't want to use Windoze or Linux or MacOS, who are all seen as "the enemy" (one of the reasons I don't visit other Amiga sites). :roll: These people who are willing to shell out 300$ to buy some rare, archaic device for their equally archaic machine, but refuse to spend 200$ for a tiny netbook for the purpose of browsing shouldn't be a part of the equation, sorry to say.


I don't think that's the reason for anyone today. As said, computers can be dirt cheap nowadays (even though some people seem to be willing pay for them still for all kind of incredible reasons! (on PC side too, I mean))

It's just freedom of the choise. I have other computers than Amigas too. Mac Mini with OSX (currently), couple of PCs with W2k, XP and Linuxes. But only Pegasos and A1200 are in daily use. OSX is deadly slow for everyday use, PCs other issues. I just love the speed and usability on Pegasos for example. In theory I could use sites which won't work its browsers, but practise has shown, that I won't. Jumping around on different computers for different tasks isn't that comfortable.

Anyway, I'm not forcing my opinions to anyone. I never would have guessed myself that even more than every 10th visitor here uses still Amiga's browsers. That is surprisingly big number and I'd like people would respect that. If technical reasons make it impossible to support them, so be it, but if there's any options, I'd like them to be considered and not overlooked by own habits.
Daily MorphOS user and Amiga active.
 

Offline voxel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 322
    • Show only replies by voxel
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #105 on: May 02, 2009, 10:42:13 AM »
Hi :-)

there are modern browsers that comes to the Amiga with css and all.

that's OWB, the upcomming v3 IBrowse, and others I've forgotten the name.

at that moment owb is pretty cool and usable both on AOS4 and AOS3 see : OWB

now considering Drupal, I'm using a website that's based on and I see it as heavily bugged ! with very stressing issues for the users :-(

Amigalement,
Jean-François Bachelet, Amiga nuts since 1985.
-------------------------------------------------
Welcome to Happy Computing : Amiga! (© 2K4-2K8 voxel)
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #106 on: May 02, 2009, 10:49:41 AM »
Quote

NoFastMem wrote:
Quote

Wayne wrote:
Quote

NoFastMem wrote:
One doesn't honour the dead by mounting the corpse in plain view.

Just had to say, I love that..  May I quote you?

Wayne


Sure!


Some cultures actually do honour their dead by mounting the corpse in plain view :-D

But I do agree with the sentiment in this case ;-)

Quote


@pVC

Sorry, I just think you missed the point of my argument, I wasn't comparing the C64's capabilities to the Amiga, just the approaches the relevant communities take.


I'm trying to think of a suitable metaphor, but suffice to say, the internet we use today is NOT the same internet that we used back in 1997... Trying to use the Amiga for modern web browsing is akin to trying to get my dad's old Hi-Fi record player to play CDs... I can make it do it, sure, but i need to hook up a CD module to it, and then get that to output to the AUX input of the old amp... the resulting sound is muddy, dull and unacceptable to me...

I think Amigas now need to be used for what they were originally designed. No point trying to push them to do badly, what a modern machine can do well.

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #107 on: May 02, 2009, 11:01:23 AM »
@Woosh777

Use a Mac then. I can type non-english characters with ease in my case Alt-u followed by either a, o or u to get the German umlaut... Plus OSX has no MBR partition or DOS volume name legacy as found on window.

End of discussion.

Offline DiskDoctor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 308
    • Show only replies by DiskDoctor
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #108 on: May 02, 2009, 06:14:09 PM »
@ Wayne

Just for curiosity...

You're saying abandoning historical data is an option.

Say knowing that are you being backuping the current e.g. posting data anyhow into some future-accessible version? :-) Like this one particularly?

No irony here, just an idea...
Was: Mac Mini PPC running MorphOS 2.4
Now: Amiga Forever 2010 with AmiKit and AmigaSYS
Not used: Icaros Desktop 1.2 (reason: no wifi)
Planned soon: an OS4 system
Shortly then: a MOS notebook (wifi is a must-have)
 

Offline Digiorb

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 3
    • Show only replies by Digiorb
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #109 on: May 02, 2009, 10:18:59 PM »
@Wayne:

I haven't been on here in a long time, but after getting the email I thought I would stop by. And I have a simple solution... Just fire up CNET or Zeus and pipe in FIDO via the internet!  :-D

Ok, seriously...I think it's time to move forward. I'm not to sure about Drupal though. I never had much luck with it. Have you looked at Drake CMS (now called Lanius CMS I think)?

I haven't owned an Amiga for some time...still miss my A3000 tower! I would love to get back into it with OS 4.x, but I can't see paying a high price for a low end system. Not to use the "M" word (and I don't mean mobile!), but maybe at this point Amiga should focus on software and get OS 4.x to run on standard PCs like Microsoft did.

 

Offline whoosh777

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2003
  • Posts: 114
    • Show only replies by whoosh777
    • http://www.whoosh777.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #110 on: May 03, 2009, 12:04:18 AM »
Well I think the question is all academic

as www.amiga.org CRASHES IBrowse on WinUAE here

ALREADY! :griping: :destroy:
the only way to visit this thread for me is using either Firefox or IE on XP, or Firefox on Linux.

I think today anyone interested in 68k-AmigaOS should
use it via either WinUAE or Amiga Forever on
Windows.

as its quite a good way to control a PC

IN STARK CONTRAST the PC forum I mentioned can
be accessed just fine from IBrowse here,

http://board.flatassembler.net/index.php

maybe you should have some of what they are having?

:pint: :crazy:
 

Offline whoosh777

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2003
  • Posts: 114
    • Show only replies by whoosh777
    • http://www.whoosh777.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #111 on: May 03, 2009, 12:11:55 AM »
Quote

I can't beliveve I'm weighing in on this, since it's irrelevant, but NTFS supports mounting drives without a drive letter just fine.


unfortunately the drive then vanishes from the list
of drives, eg when you click Start My-computer

and it is inaccessible from WinUAE

Now you could mount it as a folder in a different drive
with a letter, but I have 3 PCs and 3 USB2 drives,

which I move between machines, as well as 4 internal
HDs

if I start mounting drives as folders the drives will
vanish.

thus it is STILL deficient compared to a 68k-Amiga

where ALL drives APPEAR on the Workbench and there
is no nonsense of drive letters and the

RIDICULOUS idea of mounting an unlettered drive as a folder
of a lettered drive.


the way the Amiga does this is PERFECT, just right
and CANNOT be bettered

the way Windows does it is just idiotic

 

Offline Trev

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Trev
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #112 on: May 03, 2009, 01:26:38 AM »
@whoosh777

How is C: (as a Windows drive letter) any different from DF0:, Workbench:, SYS:, or any other label? There are pros and cons to both ways of doing things, e.g. in Windows, I don't have to create mountlists for new devices--they just work. (You shouldn't have to under AmigaOS, either, as long as the host adapter does it for you during autoconf, but that's not always the case.)

Anyhow, I think they can both be "bettered." The notion of devices, volumes, and hierarchical file systems is so 20th century. Storage should be seamless and transparent and make data available in a way that's intuitive to users. (Or at least, the operating environment should.)

@all

Keep Amiga.org simple, regardless of the direction it takes.
 

  • Guest
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #113 on: May 03, 2009, 01:36:57 AM »
c'mon guys, please.  Let's stay on topic?

I'm really getting torn here between investing dozens of hours to learn Drupal, or the exciting prospect of "rolling our own" by way of simply writing a new site up around the existing data.

The problem is, drupal is far advanced and could be ready to go in a couple of weeks.  Writing one specifically for Amiga.org sounds exciting but could potentially take months, if not years to get to where the current system is now.

Wayne
 

Offline Plaz

Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #114 on: May 03, 2009, 04:46:13 AM »
I'm ok with you going with drupal, and I hope you have a way to keep the old info as an archive some how.

Plaz
 

Offline A3KOne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2002
  • Posts: 70
    • Show only replies by A3KOne
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #115 on: May 03, 2009, 05:23:43 AM »
I use Linux now at home, and Mac on the road.  Even though I rarely ever log in and post, I still read to keep up with current events in the community - and I miss the days of using my A3000 and A4000 to stream shoutcasts of Amiwest...but life goes on.

Amiga should have Mozilla or some similar browser by now. It doesn't - for a plethora of reasons already discussed.  Personally I don't care what you switch to - I can use it. It is a shame classics won't be able to. It isn't your fault, nor is it the users fault - or even the hardware as most upgraded Amigas could run a more modern browser.

Good luck and I look forward to seeing the new site.
 

Offline Trev

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2003
  • Posts: 1550
  • Country: 00
    • Show only replies by Trev
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #116 on: May 03, 2009, 07:00:56 AM »
@Wayne

You could always do server-side rendering of the complex bits and return downlevel HTML to all clients.
 

Offline lorddef

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 1146
    • Show only replies by lorddef
    • http://
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #117 on: May 03, 2009, 01:31:04 PM »
One thing amiga.org does show is how little all the gumph of "web 2.0" has actually provided us with.
Restraining orders are just another way of saying I love you!
 

Offline dammy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2002
  • Posts: 2828
    • Show only replies by dammy
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #118 on: May 03, 2009, 01:41:45 PM »
Quote
The problem is, drupal is far advanced and could be ready to go in a couple of weeks. Writing one specifically for Amiga.org sounds exciting but could potentially take months, if not years to get to where the current system is now.


I'd I were you, I'd go with Drupal since a couple of weeks is reasonable to spend on AO.  Spending months/years and you just wind up annoyed, burned out, and fed up with the entire situation while Drupal will probably matured even more during that time period.

Dammy
Dammy

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Arix-OS/414578091930728
Unless otherwise noted, I speak only for myself.
 

Offline whoosh777

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2003
  • Posts: 114
    • Show only replies by whoosh777
    • http://www.whoosh777.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Re: (RFD) Amiga.org's future
« Reply #119 from previous page: May 03, 2009, 09:02:56 PM »
Quote

Wayne wrote:
c'mon guys, please.  Let's stay on topic?

I'm really getting torn here between investing dozens of hours to learn Drupal, or the exciting prospect of "rolling our own" by way of simply writing a new site up around the existing data.

The problem is, drupal is far advanced and could be ready to go in a couple of weeks.  Writing one specifically for Amiga.org sounds exciting but could potentially take months, if not years to get to where the current system is now.

Wayne


well the answer is probably to go both ways,

learn an existing product right now and then when

that is up and running attempt to write your own forum

code as a background project.


as you point out the thing is to achieve data compatiblity,
a bit like using a different email client:

same emails, different email interpreter



learning ANY existing system will be guaranteed to

succeed whereas writing your own system will usually

take longer than you anticipate.


and as you point out, learning an existing product

is "dozens" of hours, whereas rolling your own forum

will be months.




but creating your own code in the long term is always

preferable and if done correctly evades

gratuitous dependency problems.

eg you could try writing your own forum

with php in a php-portable way: where you can port the

php code to future forms of php.


php is syntactically IDENTICAL to C, so portable php

code is an IDENTICAL problem to writing portable C code.


with php things like text boxes are achieved AUTOMAGICALLY by simply delegating the problem to HTML.

if you visit my website, the email box at the top

and the picture display options at the top are all

done in php. You can try sending me an email from

the email box to see php in action. or try selecting

different picture display options.



the URL is:

www.whoosh777.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk



php is server side so AmigaOS doesnt need any compatibility,

just ensure that the output html is compatible with

the AmigaOS browsers.


the server simply interprets the php and outputs

ascii which is the webpage the visiting browser

sees.


when I reply here, the webpage is

....../reply.php?forum=22&post_id=580111&...

the php script is reply.php

and the args are forum post_id ....

arg "forum" has value "22"
arg "post_id" has value "580111"
etc

the arg values are separated by &'s

because text input is usually large, they use
a more efficient way to send the args

after replying the URL is:
..../viewtopic.php?topic_id=50302&post_id=580225&order=0&viewmode=flat&pid=0&forum=22#forumpost580225

that is also a php script viewtopic.php

and the args are topic_id post_id order viewmode pid
forum

eg arg "viewmode" has value "flat"
and arg "order" has value 0

php is truly cool, and the only scripting language
to consider IMHO, eg this forum is ultimately php

the visitor CANNOT view the php script which is
reply.php or viewtopic.php
all they see is the html output when the server
executes reply.php

one other thing, dont trust anyone who says
one or another system has bugs as that is likely
to be FUD.

ask them to give the URL for the alleged bugs
before you believe such.

I can show you php I have done which is the
above URL.

the brilliant thing about php is you can synthesize
web content on the fly, whether it be an html page
or a jpeg or anything.

that is why most forums and intelligent web pages
are done with php