Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Need Gayle Truth Table  (Read 2616 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr_RighteousTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 1345
    • Show only replies by Dr_Righteous
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2008, 11:06:16 PM »
@alexh

Yes. A new PCB.

Without mouse/joystick, keyboard, parallel, serial, IDE, floppy, sound, PC Card or any other legacy I/O functions.

Just AGA graphics and Zorro II expansion slots. That's it.
- Doc

A4000D, A3640 OC-36.3MHz, custom tower, Mediator A4000D. Diamond Banshee 16M, Indivision AGA 4000, GVP HC+8.

Mac Mini 1.5GHz, that might run MorphOS someday, when the fools who own it come to the realization that 30 minutes just isn\'t enough time to play with it enough to decide whether or not you like it enough to cough up $200.

 - Someone please design SOME kind of DIY accelerator for the A4000. :D -
 

Offline cicero790

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 322
    • Show only replies by cicero790
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2008, 11:06:51 PM »
I don't understand a word of this, but this is the same attitude that took us to the moon. I hope you find a way. The best of luck with the project. :-)
A1200 030 40MHz: 2/32MB Indivision AGA MkII
A600 7 MHz: 2MB
AROS 600 MHz
PC 13600 MHz: quad core i7 2600K 3.4GHz: 16GB RAM: ATI HD6950 2GB   (Yes I know)

WINUAE AmiKit ClassicWB AmigaSYS UAE4Droid  

 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2008, 11:07:30 PM »
You gonna re-write / patch the kickstart ROM?

I think that it is technically feasible. But you will have to be able to design PCB's and have the software etc. You'll need a working knowledge of analog and digital design. 68000 bus topology. Amiga bus design etc.

The biggest problem is finding a good source of AGA chips.

I would recommend that you turn your interest to FPGA programming and work on the MiniMig core instead. This is more likely to help reach your goal in the long term.
 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2008, 11:09:54 PM »
Quote

cicero790 wrote:
this is the same attitude that took us to the moon.

How do you mean? The "We do not have the technical ability to do this, so lets fake it" attitude? ;-)
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2008, 11:11:01 PM »
Quote

Dr_Righteous wrote:
@alexh

Yes. A new PCB.

Without mouse/joystick, keyboard, parallel, serial, IDE, floppy, sound, PC Card or any other legacy I/O functions.

Just AGA graphics and Zorro II expansion slots. That's it.


Even without the legacy ports you'll still need the CIA chips as AmigaOS uses their timers etc...

-Edit- You'll also need Paula for the interrupt control of the 68k... The Amiga was really very highly integrated, you can't just lop bits off...

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2008, 11:15:29 PM »
You could buy an A1200 and a Zorro bus board and desolder all the legacy connectors :-)

The features of the Paula and the CIA will be part of the MiniMig core and so you could probably use a small FPGA to work around those chips.
 

Offline cicero790

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 322
    • Show only replies by cicero790
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2008, 11:17:37 PM »
Quote

alexh wrote:
Quote

cicero790 wrote:
this is the same attitude that took us to the moon.

How do you mean? The "We do not have the technical ability to do this, so lets fake it" attitude? ;-)


Ah, alexh, don't waste your brainpower on me.   :-)
A1200 030 40MHz: 2/32MB Indivision AGA MkII
A600 7 MHz: 2MB
AROS 600 MHz
PC 13600 MHz: quad core i7 2600K 3.4GHz: 16GB RAM: ATI HD6950 2GB   (Yes I know)

WINUAE AmiKit ClassicWB AmigaSYS UAE4Droid  

 

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2008, 11:20:15 PM »
The "Did we? Didnt we?" go to the moon argument is one of my favourite. I am an amateur astronomer, educated Physicist,  and knowledgeable mechanical engineer and even I am still in two minds.

But this is another thread.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2008, 11:20:47 PM »
Quote

alexh wrote:
You could buy an A1200 and a Zorro bus board and desolder all the legacy connectors :-)

The features of the Paula and the CIA will be part of the MiniMig core and so you could probably use a small FPGA to work around those chips.


Then why not just add a Zorro compatible connector to the MiniMig :-)

Zorro I was basically just the 68k signals anyway...

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2008, 11:22:02 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
Then why not just add a Zorro compatible connector to the MiniMig?

Because it has no AGA. Real chips would offer better OCS/ECS compatibility than the current core of MiniMig.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2008, 11:25:41 PM »
Quote

alexh wrote:
The "Did we? Didnt we?" go to the moon argument is one of my favourite. I am an amateur astronomer, educated Physicist,  and knowledgeable mechanical engineer and even I am still in two minds.

But this is another thread.


I'm in the same boat, 90% certain that we did... but no escaping that 10% doubt...

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2008, 11:27:11 PM »
Quote

alexh wrote:
Quote

bloodline wrote:
Then why not just add a Zorro compatible connector to the MiniMig?

Because it has no AGA. Real chips would offer better OCS/ECS compatibility than the current core of MiniMig.


I think it would be easier to add AGA compatibility to MiniMig than to try and build a whole new Amiga PCB...

Offline alexh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2005
  • Posts: 3644
    • Show only replies by alexh
    • http://thalion.atari.org
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2008, 11:29:25 PM »
Quote

bloodline wrote:
I think it would be easier to add AGA compatibility to MiniMig than to try and build a whole new Amiga PCB...

I disagree.

PCB design is fairly easy. Once you're trained and with the right data sheets, the right tools, the right gerber files, (and the right amount of money!) you can knock off a PCB inside a week. Even at the complexity of the Amiga motherboard. From start to finish, with debugging, 4-5 man weeks.

It will take several years to develop MiniMig AGA compatibility to the same level as you would get from real chips AND then you'd have to develop a new PCB anyhow!
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2008, 11:36:10 PM »
Quote

alexh wrote:
Quote

bloodline wrote:
I think it would be easier to add AGA compatibility to MiniMig than to try and build a whole new Amiga PCB...

I disagree.

PCB design is fairly easy. Once you're trained and with the right data sheets, the right tools, the right gerber files, (and the right amount of money!) you can knock off a PCB inside a week. Even at the complexity of the Amiga motherboard. From start to finish, with debugging, 4-5 man weeks.

It will take several years to develop MiniMig AGA compatibility to the same level as you would get from real chips AND then you'd have to develop a new PCB anyhow!


Ok... well, then... I'd just say use UAE :-)

Offline little

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 223
    • Show only replies by little
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #28 on: August 19, 2008, 12:10:06 AM »
Quote
Because it has no AGA. Real chips would offer better OCS/ECS compatibility than the current core of MiniMig.

Call me crazy, but is there any chance get a hold of the molds used to make the enhanced chip set? I mean, supposing they are not one mile deep in a city trash dump, what else can they be used besides making those chips? Since the rights to that technology has probably expired, it might be feasible.
 

Offline bloodline

  • Master Sock Abuser
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2002
  • Posts: 12113
    • Show only replies by bloodline
    • http://www.troubled-mind.com
Re: Need Gayle Truth Table
« Reply #29 from previous page: August 19, 2008, 12:19:22 AM »
Quote

little wrote:
Quote
Because it has no AGA. Real chips would offer better OCS/ECS compatibility than the current core of MiniMig.

Call me crazy, but is there any chance get a hold of the molds used to make the enhanced chip set? I mean, supposing they are not one mile deep in a city trash dump, what else can they be used besides making those chips? Since the rights to that technology has probably expired, it might be feasible.


As far as anyone knows none of the old chip masks exist any more... Plus they would be for an old chip process, I imagine it would be hard to find a Fab that could even use the masks nowadays...